Pages:
Author

Topic: Did we actually really land on moon? - page 7. (Read 7512 times)

legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
December 18, 2019, 07:53:41 AM
...
A good example of an impossible observation of the moon is:

   Two people, one in NY and one in LA making simultaneous observations of the moon will see exactly the same face. This is consistent with observing a projected disc above a plain while completely debunking the idea we're on a globe observing another globe.

No they don't see the same thing.

Actually what they do see proves it's a globe.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
December 18, 2019, 04:42:27 AM
@BADecker I can prove the moon is evenly lit, this is consistent with the moon being a projected holographic disc of plasma. It also debunks the idea the moon is a solid sphere reflecting sunlight.

Rainbows prove there's a concave mirror above us, they can't form without a reflective surface and the theory they're caused solely by the internal reflections of suspended water droplets can be debunked via experiment.

What do Astrophysicists have to say about this? They stick their fucking head in the sand and pretend it doesn't real:

   "The best possible explanation for the Moon is observational error – the Moon doesn’t exist." -- Irwin Shapiro, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

A good example of an impossible observation of the moon is:

   Two people, one in NY and one in LA making simultaneous observations of the moon will see exactly the same face. This is consistent with observing a projected disc above a plain while completely debunking the idea we're on a globe observing another globe.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
December 17, 2019, 09:28:12 PM

I also thought that technology back then isn't more develope to support the landing on the moon. I mean it is possible as of today but at that time I think its impossible

Accidentally successful... landing on the moon. Not impossible.

Cool
Six times in a row?
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
December 16, 2019, 06:19:48 AM
Ok, don't throw me into the same basket for the believers of conspiracy theories.

I believe Earth is NOT flat. I don't believe there are aliens in Area 51.

But this question is factually not very convincing and it is, did we actually land on moon in 1969.

There are many compelling evidences, facts etc that proves that indeed we landed on moon.

But even in 21st century where there an accident with Kalpana Chawla who merely went to space and came back, it sounds too good to be true that in 1969, we landed on the moon which is around 300000 kms or 186000 miles from the Earth with those time of technologies and successfully came back. Remember, the first apple computer was launched in 1976.

I'm not saying we didn't, I'm just saying that it's not really a question that can be debunked like other theories which says Earth is flat.


Aliens were always on Earth, they are among us. And it’s normal, believe me. In addition, we ourselves are aliens from another planet. There is a lot of information about this, so whoever seeks will find the truth.

We landed on the moon. But no one tells us that on the moon there are remnants of other civilizations (the destroyed foundations of buildings, etc.)

The world has a lot of surprising things, about which 99 percent of people do not even know.

But how can we know that you are right? I mean, notbatman says the earth is flat, and the moon is only plasma reflected holographicly off some kind of a mirror (or something), but he can't prove it. So, what do you offer as proof for what you say? There are loads of science fiction writers out there, who have written about almost everything imaginable.

Documentation regarding going to the moon is pretty solid. Where is the solid documentation for what you say?

Cool
member
Activity: 273
Merit: 14
December 15, 2019, 10:36:57 PM
Ok, don't throw me into the same basket for the believers of conspiracy theories.

I believe Earth is NOT flat. I don't believe there are aliens in Area 51.

But this question is factually not very convincing and it is, did we actually land on moon in 1969.

There are many compelling evidences, facts etc that proves that indeed we landed on moon.

But even in 21st century where there an accident with Kalpana Chawla who merely went to space and came back, it sounds too good to be true that in 1969, we landed on the moon which is around 300000 kms or 186000 miles from the Earth with those time of technologies and successfully came back. Remember, the first apple computer was launched in 1976.

I'm not saying we didn't, I'm just saying that it's not really a question that can be debunked like other theories which says Earth is flat.


Aliens were always on Earth, they are among us. And it’s normal, believe me. In addition, we ourselves are aliens from another planet. There is a lot of information about this, so whoever seeks will find the truth.

We landed on the moon. But no one tells us that on the moon there are remnants of other civilizations (the destroyed foundations of buildings, etc.)

The world has a lot of surprising things, about which 99 percent of people do not even know.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
December 15, 2019, 10:23:25 AM
i think no humans landed on moon , ok lets see this way if any of them landed on moon why not do it again if its done in past they would be technology and all ,

You mean, there would be a big fucking rocket?
sr. member
Activity: 698
Merit: 251
December 15, 2019, 05:43:20 AM
i think no humans landed on moon , ok lets see this way if any of them landed on moon why not do it again if its done in past they would be technology and all ,
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
December 14, 2019, 03:09:33 PM
^^^ How else would you render the lunar surface? Without a computer you'd have to use 1960's movie special effects. NASA destroyed that technology and they claim it would be a painful process to build it back again.

Yeah, rendering a 3d animation of the lunar surface would really be hard. It couldn't possibly have been done in 1969-1972.

they would have had to actually go to the moon to take pics of guys walking around the moon.

For that they'd just need the orbital mechanics equations, and a sextant to use to sight stars.

And a big fucking rocket.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
December 14, 2019, 08:32:16 AM
^^^ How else would you render the lunar surface? Without a computer you'd have to use 1960's movie special effects. NASA destroyed that technology and they claim it would be a painful process to build it back again.
The way they did it was to go to the moon to film going to the moon, since that was the easiest and cheapest way to fake going to the moon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6MOnehCOUw


Besides, who keeps their 1969 computers? I got rid of my 1977 Tandy a long time ago. It didn't even have asuch a thing as a hard drive. Why keep it.

Is Batty is simply living in the past, or what?

Cool
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
December 13, 2019, 08:51:41 PM
^^^ How else would you render the lunar surface? Without a computer you'd have to use 1960's movie special effects. NASA destroyed that technology and they claim it would be a painful process to build it back again.
The way they did it was to go to the moon to film going to the moon, since that was the easiest and cheapest way to fake going to the moon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6MOnehCOUw
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
December 13, 2019, 07:24:00 PM
^^^ How else would you render the lunar surface? Without a computer you'd have to use 1960's movie special effects. NASA destroyed that technology and they claim it would be a painful process to build it back again.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
December 13, 2019, 06:47:39 PM


.............

............... And now go check when that one has been developed.

A little CPU/ microcomputer history
..

Why do you think someone would need a computer to go to the Moon? For what exact purposes?

Please be specific.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
December 13, 2019, 06:17:31 PM
All the evidence points to the fact that we did. For example Russia and other countries having the capability to know while it was going on whether we did or not. It's really not something you can hide and thus pretend that you did.
There is no doubt that the launching of the Saturn rockets could not be hidden, and in space they could be tracked by radar.  Ultimately the proof is the >800 lbs of rocks and dirt that was brought back. Microscopic examination shows it cannot have been produced on the Earth. Also there are the reflectors left at the landing sites.

They'll just say that Russia was in it to, along with all the other governments in the world. Or that they're just telling you those are moon rocks, but they select who can study them. Or that the reflectors were put there by robots sent there.

Right! Let's get the people on the stand under oath or affirmation, to answer the questions against shrewd interrogators... with the death penalty if they lie.

Cool
newbie
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
December 13, 2019, 05:29:33 PM
All the evidence points to the fact that we did. For example Russia and other countries having the capability to know while it was going on whether we did or not. It's really not something you can hide and thus pretend that you did.
There is no doubt that the launching of the Saturn rockets could not be hidden, and in space they could be tracked by radar.  Ultimately the proof is the >800 lbs of rocks and dirt that was brought back. Microscopic examination shows it cannot have been produced on the Earth. Also there are the reflectors left at the landing sites.

They'll just say that Russia was in it to, along with all the other governments in the world. Or that they're just telling you those are moon rocks, but they select who can study them. Or that the reflectors were put there by robots sent there.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
December 02, 2019, 11:30:36 AM


.............

............... And now go check when that one has been developed.

A little CPU/ microcomputer history





If I don't understand what all this stuff means, what are the results of this calc? What are you really saying?

Cool
sr. member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 297
Bitcoin © Maximalist
December 02, 2019, 03:52:24 AM


.............

............... And now go check when that one has been developed.

A little CPU/ microcomputer history



legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
December 02, 2019, 02:05:42 AM
Ok, don't throw me into the same basket for the believers of conspiracy theories.

I believe Earth is NOT flat. I don't believe there are aliens in Area 51.

But this question is factually not very convincing and it is, did we actually land on moon in 1969.

There are many compelling evidences, facts etc that proves that indeed we landed on moon.

But even in 21st century where there an accident with Kalpana Chawla who merely went to space and came back, it sounds too good to be true that in 1969, we landed on the moon which is around 300000 kms or 186000 miles from the Earth with those time of technologies and successfully came back. Remember, the first apple computer was launched in 1976.

I'm not saying we didn't, I'm just saying that it's not really a question that can be debunked like other theories which says Earth is flat.

I also thought that technology back then isn't more develope to support the landing on the moon. I mean it is possible as of today but at that time I think its impossible

Prove it.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
December 01, 2019, 04:42:26 PM

I also thought that technology back then isn't more develope to support the landing on the moon. I mean it is possible as of today but at that time I think its impossible

Accidentally successful... landing on the moon. Not impossible.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 5937
December 01, 2019, 08:16:50 AM


I also thought that technology back then isn't more develope to support the landing on the moon. I mean it is possible as of today but at that time I think its impossible

How much you actually know about technology back then, to think that it is impossible?

I am sure that you had no idea that for example ISS use Intel 386 processors. And now go check when that one has been developed.
newbie
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
December 01, 2019, 06:12:03 AM
Ok, don't throw me into the same basket for the believers of conspiracy theories.

I believe Earth is NOT flat. I don't believe there are aliens in Area 51.

But this question is factually not very convincing and it is, did we actually land on moon in 1969.

There are many compelling evidences, facts etc that proves that indeed we landed on moon.

But even in 21st century where there an accident with Kalpana Chawla who merely went to space and came back, it sounds too good to be true that in 1969, we landed on the moon which is around 300000 kms or 186000 miles from the Earth with those time of technologies and successfully came back. Remember, the first apple computer was launched in 1976.

I'm not saying we didn't, I'm just saying that it's not really a question that can be debunked like other theories which says Earth is flat.

I also thought that technology back then isn't more develope to support the landing on the moon. I mean it is possible as of today but at that time I think its impossible
Pages:
Jump to: