Author

Topic: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ Core v6.16.5.1 - DigiShield, DigiSpeed, Segwit - page 1371. (Read 3058926 times)

full member
Activity: 159
Merit: 100
Guys... in my opinion, what we need too is to have investors. Pumping Digibyte is probably very easy for big BTC holders... and much more easy than pumping other coins like BTC-LTC-DRK-NAUT-DOGE... because of the actual volumes of DGB trades. But unfortunately I'm not one of these rich and powered guys Sad

Maybe some of you will think that after a pump, there will be a dump. But for DGB, i'm pretty sure it will be kinda different, because :

- this bitcointalk thread is one of the fullest thread and lots of people knows DGB by it (and probably a lot of guys, even if they have not a lot of DGB actually, stay informed because they see in Digibyte a good potential)
- I remember the panic BUYING of the last month, when "maybe" a lil' group of pumper have put DGB to around 75 satoshis.
- DGB is kinda undervalued yet. But not a bit, really!

That's why I think if we can find some investors, teamed (I can dream), who will be able to "help" the DGB market when an official good news from the DGB devs (twitter, facebook...) will be released, this can be one way to rise DGB in a sustainable way.

To conclude, I think DGB have difficulties in its price charts only because it is actually at a critical low point. The day when DGB will be around 150+ satochi, interests on it will grow and ONLY THEN Digibyte will "fly with it's own wings" (french expression, I dunno if this is understandable when translated^^)

Regards.
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
Hello I'd like to introduce myself, Im KIZLOC
Ive been mining DGB sine the the start and I live in the UK, Will anybody be going to the Crypto-currency Convention in London on Oct 22nd 2014, I will most probably be going and is there any thing I can do help? Smiley

I am planning to be there too Wink A DGB lover too Cheesy

See you There, will Jared be going?
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Agree with your assessment. All of the conversation was just more brainstorming. Not suggesting to do either. More importantly, you would never want to jeopardize the long term health and sustainability of the coin.

YC


Do people in the community believe that reducing the supply would be better for long term health of the coin? Would they be more inclined to invest if they are on the fences?

YC
I think as long as DGB isn't at mainstream, a total coin reduction would be good. However, this should be done in a fair manner - meaning that if the supply is divided by ten then every coin should be a tenth coin afterwards. So if we reduce from 21 billion to lets say 210m them 1m current coins should become 10k coins. This is fair for current holders and fair to later investors. It shouldn't have the taste of a motivation of greed. The motivation is to push 1 DGB in a direction of $0.01 - $0.1 each. That's currently ~ 0.000015 - 0.00015BTC
So a reduction to 560m or 56m would make sense imho.

At a later time there's still the possibility to raise the quantity again if needed.

Honestly while I get what you are saying (essentially handle it like a reverse stock split) I think this would be a bad idea and I'm not sure it is possible do this from a technical aspect
Both you and I understand why it would be fair but I really think it would infuriate many holders simply because they are greedy.   

I really am not sure if I would oppose or support a reduction the more I think about it.  It was just a random though I had.


sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Do people in the community believe that reducing the supply would be better for long term health of the coin? Would they be more inclined to invest if they are on the fences?

YC
I think as long as DGB isn't at mainstream, a total coin reduction would be good. However, this should be done in a fair manner - meaning that if the supply is divided by ten then every coin should be a tenth coin afterwards. So if we reduce from 21 billion to lets say 210m them 1m current coins should become 10k coins. This is fair for current holders and fair to later investors. It shouldn't have the taste of a motivation of greed. The motivation is to push 1 DGB in a direction of $0.01 - $0.1 each. That's currently ~ 0.000015 - 0.00015BTC
So a reduction to 560m or 56m would make sense imho.

At a later time there's still the possibility to raise the quantity again if needed.

Honestly while I get what you are saying (essentially handle it like a reverse stock split) I think this would be a bad idea and I'm not sure it is possible do this from a technical aspect
Both you and I understand why it would be fair but I really think it would infuriate many holders simply because they are greedy.   

I really am not sure if I would oppose or support a reduction the more I think about it.  It was just a random though I had.

hero member
Activity: 786
Merit: 1000
Do people in the community believe that reducing the supply would be better for long term health of the coin? Would they be more inclined to invest if they are on the fences?

YC
I think as long as DGB isn't at mainstream, a total coin reduction would be good. However, this should be done in a fair manner - meaning that if the supply is divided by ten then every coin should be a tenth coin afterwards. So if we reduce from 21 billion to lets say 210m them 1m current coins should become 10k coins. This is fair for current holders and fair to later investors. It shouldn't have the taste of a motivation of greed. The motivation is to push 1 DGB in a direction of $0.01 - $0.1 each. That's currently ~ 0.000015 - 0.00015BTC
So a reduction to 560m or 56m would make sense imho.

At a later time there's still the possibility to raise the quantity again if needed.

I don't think a reduction is necessary, as it's greedy and desperate.  This community is active, and dedicated.  Give it time.  Quit worrying about the current "price" and just worry about exposure and services.
hero member
Activity: 984
Merit: 1000
Do people in the community believe that reducing the supply would be better for long term health of the coin? Would they be more inclined to invest if they are on the fences?

YC
I think as long as DGB isn't at mainstream, a total coin reduction would be good. However, this should be done in a fair manner - meaning that if the supply is divided by ten then every coin should be a tenth coin afterwards. So if we reduce from 21 billion to lets say 210m them 1m current coins should become 10k coins. This is fair for current holders and fair to later investors. It shouldn't have the taste of a motivation of greed. The motivation is to push 1 DGB in a direction of $0.01 - $0.1 each. That's currently ~ 0.000015 - 0.00015BTC
So a reduction to 560m or 56m would make sense imho.

At a later time there's still the possibility to raise the quantity again if needed.
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000
The future is bright with DigiByte.
Hello I'd like to introduce myself, Im KIZLOC
Ive been mining DGB sine the the start and I live in the UK, Will anybody be going to the Crypto-currency Convention in London on Oct 22nd 2014, I will most probably be going and is there any thing I can do help? Smiley

I am planning to be there too Wink A DGB lover too Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Do people in the community believe that reducing the supply would be better for long term health of the coin? Would they be more inclined to invest if they are on the fences?

YC


I think the key is to constantly be pushing news. In the situation of DGB, you have the flexibility that the dev is really trying to make sure the coin is the best. In addition, adoption needs to continue happening. DOGE, NAUT and many other coins took full advantage of the DigiShield implementation and for what it's worth, not sure there was enough of a lasting effect on our community. With all the wild exaggeration in the market, DGB should be an easy $.10-.20. Why not?

YC

I understand that an algo change announcement doesnt happen over night. Little things like, we are looking to implement this or x is happeing on this date. FACTS bring money into the coin. The value of the coin will determine how useful it is to the public, and DGB is a little behind in that department.

this is true.  Also that a fork cannot be done without warning or a disaster like Dark will happen. So even if an announcement is made this week the fork cannot happen for at least a week. Meanwhile bulk Asics are currently being shipped.
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
Hello I'd like to introduce myself, Im KIZLOC
Ive been mining DGB sine the the start and I live in the UK, Will anybody be going to the Crypto-currency Convention in London on Oct 22nd 2014, I will most probably be going and is there any thing I can do help? Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1062
Merit: 1003
I think the key is to constantly be pushing news. In the situation of DGB, you have the flexibility that the dev is really trying to make sure the coin is the best. In addition, adoption needs to continue happening. DOGE, NAUT and many other coins took full advantage of the DigiShield implementation and for what it's worth, not sure there was enough of a lasting effect on our community. With all the wild exaggeration in the market, DGB should be an easy $.10-.20. Why not?

YC

I understand that an algo change announcement doesnt happen over night. Little things like, we are looking to implement this or x is happeing on this date. FACTS bring money into the coin. The value of the coin will determine how useful it is to the public, and DGB is a little behind in that department.

this is true.  Also that a fork cannot be done without warning or a disaster like Dark will happen. So even if an announcement is made this week the fork cannot happen for at least a week. Meanwhile bulk Asics are currently being shipped.
newbie
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
I think the key is to constantly be pushing news. In the situation of DGB, you have the flexibility that the dev is really trying to make sure the coin is the best. In addition, adoption needs to continue happening. DOGE, NAUT and many other coins took full advantage of the DigiShield implementation and for what it's worth, not sure there was enough of a lasting effect on our community. With all the wild exaggeration in the market, DGB should be an easy $.10-.20. Why not?

YC

I understand that an algo change announcement doesnt happen over night. Little things like, we are looking to implement this or x is happeing on this date. FACTS bring money into the coin. The value of the coin will determine how useful it is to the public, and DGB is a little behind in that department.
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
I think the key is to constantly be pushing news. In the situation of DGB, you have the flexibility that the dev is really trying to make sure the coin is the best. In addition, adoption needs to continue happening. DOGE, NAUT and many other coins took full advantage of the DigiShield implementation and for what it's worth, not sure there was enough of a lasting effect on our community. With all the wild exaggeration in the market, DGB should be an easy $.10-.20. Why not?

YC
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
but in the eyes of the crypto world, who I swear has ADD

LOL there is no doubt about that!  I agree there probably was an opportunity missed especially with the NAUT train, hopefully the announcement makes everyone forget.
There are and likely will be more XC profits out there, perhaps that is another opportunity to catch the next rocket.


newbie
Activity: 38
Merit: 0


That depends a bit on when you are talking about: today, tomorrow, 5 years from now, 10 years from now . . .  Wink

I think this may be the hardest thing to balance in the crypto world for Devs.  You want to build for the long term but things move so fast and there is so much competition that if you don't pay attention to the now as well you will get passed by.

"Things may come to those who wait, but only the things left by those who hustle.”  Abraham Lincoln Wierd that their pinned tweet says just that yet no announcements in a long time.

They have stated that there will be an announcement this week

Yes, but if there was any movement made during the Naut hype, during the Doge race, during the DRK run when people had their profits, DGB could have sent itself to the launch pad. Opportunities were not capitalized on. Now personally I understand when personal things come up, but in the eyes of the crypto world, who I swear has ADD, you need to be as transparent as possible.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250


That depends a bit on when you are talking about: today, tomorrow, 5 years from now, 10 years from now . . .  Wink

I think this may be the hardest thing to balance in the crypto world for Devs.  You want to build for the long term but things move so fast and there is so much competition that if you don't pay attention to the now as well you will get passed by.

"Things may come to those who wait, but only the things left by those who hustle.”  Abraham Lincoln Wierd that their pinned tweet says just that yet no announcements in a long time.

They have stated that there will be an announcement this week
newbie
Activity: 38
Merit: 0


That depends a bit on when you are talking about: today, tomorrow, 5 years from now, 10 years from now . . .  Wink

I think this may be the hardest thing to balance in the crypto world for Devs.  You want to build for the long term but things move so fast and there is so much competition that if you don't pay attention to the now as well you will get passed by.

"Things may come to those who wait, but only the things left by those who hustle.”  Abraham Lincoln Wierd that their pinned tweet says just that yet no announcements in a long time.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250


That depends a bit on when you are talking about: today, tomorrow, 5 years from now, 10 years from now . . .  Wink

I think this may be the hardest thing to balance in the crypto world for Devs.  You want to build for the long term but things move so fast and there is so much competition that if you don't pay attention to the now as well you will get passed by.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
We need to get more marketing done. I have been asking about PR contacts for quite some time. Does anyone in the community have any folks that would do a story on DGB?!

Thanks,
YC

The cnbc thing helped a little but it was only a short lived gain. Perhaps we should follow the 'if you build it they will come' principle and look at features more than marketing. After all, from a real benefit point of view all we have is the speed of transactions. Something innovative like Dark had with annonimity might work better long term.

Definitely need a good mix of both PR and features.   You can have all the features in the world but if few know about them what good are they?  On the other side you can market all you want but if the product is inferior or not unique it won't do any good.
full member
Activity: 308
Merit: 100
Hi,

we are running the site www.crypto-coins-table.com

- 646 coins indexed so far (28th May 2014)
- providing detailed charts on pricing and volume
- capitalisation listing
- top and flop coins
- many filters to analyse

personalized features
- create individual watchlists
- track your coins value and compare

W have listed your coin already. To provide the full and uptodate information
on your coin, please use the update function.

Thanks, the coin-table team

contact us, if you would like to join the team or advertise on crypto-coins-table.com
Jump to: