Topic: [Discussion] Bitcointalk Community Awards 🏆 - page 9. (Read 20205 times)

How could I? That picture is pure gold


Of course! Remember this?


 

By the way, PytagoraZ confounded us with Clowns Cartel, but I reminded him quickly forum Police is

Very nice and I cannot wait for the contest to start.
Thank you team for taking care of this cumbersome task of organising, managing, and doing all the counting and sorting for the contest that:


Mixed feelings on this:

That one made me giggle. I thought exactly about that picture, and you didn't fail to deliver. Wait... do you have a file for each one of us?!

So, do you guys having fun? With your "community awards", I'm not here to sow discord, but I'd like to suggest an addition,
Best forum doormat(little submissive bitch) :

If it's possible, add that, I think the competition will be a big one, because there are so many.😉

Yes, automatic vote counting is great, but I don't think it will work.

Many people (including me) want to add a description of why they nominated a particular candidate. My point is that there are many factors due to which many votes may not be taken into account.

Thanks for this reminder, joker_josue!

I think we already have a good template from last year. It was suggested by Upgrade00. Is this what you had in mind?


As for enforcing a rule... I don't know if that would actually work. Since many nominate events / fails like "FAILED TO EARN AND HOLD 1btc", "Situación Actual", "Cancel Culture on social media", "Some exchanges are at war", "Get Your Funds Out of Exchange", "BUY THE DIP AND HODL" -- which make no sense (LOL!) -- it would probably be even more difficult to enforce a posting rule, although for the one counting the votes it would be helpful. If we'd enforce such a "voting etiquette" then perhaps even less votes would be eligible...

However, we can make an appeal to users for following a template

@GazetaBitcoin It would be interesting to have a rule for how votes are cast, as this would make collecting votes easier.
I've already spoken to @icopress about the matter, but I can talk to you too. Or talk to him to find out what I said.

Ladies and gentlemen,

For this year's event we decided again to take into account the feedback received from various users, at the previous events, and apply some fine-tuning to the existent rules. Additionally there will also be some new rules. All these will -- we hope -- bring even more accurate results!

Therefore, the following rules will apply for Bitcointalk Community Awards event 2023 edition:

1. Votes for inactive users will not be taken into consideration anymore. The event is related to the activity made by users during current year and not for the past. As a consequence, votes for users like Satoshi, Lauda etc. (with all due respect for all good things they did in the past) will not be counted. Of course, this does not mean that a user's vote will be entirely not counted, if he nominates an inactive user. Only the vote for the inactive user is not counted.

As a sum-up: if a user makes nominations of both active users and inactive ones, only the mentions of inactive ones will be not counted (in the contest's final results there will be no Satoshi, no Lauda etc.).

2. No merit sending is allowed from nominees to users which nominated them. This should improve dramatically the accuracy of results and offenders will have to support a penalty. For each merit sent, 1 vote is deducted. So for example, if in the voting topic Alice sent 5 merits to those who nominated her in any category, then we will not count these votes (but the rest of the votes that are addressed to other nominees will be taken into account). In addition, if a user voted for Alice in two categories, then the votes for each of the categories will be unaccounted for.

3. You must have 50 earned merits to vote ➥ Note.

4. Copy-pasted votes will not be counted and they'll be reported for plagiarism. This rule was added after some incidents from the past, which led to having a particular user reported for plagiarism.

Other changes:

Prizes were decided based on community feedback.

Please make sure you express the nominations in a coherent manner. Here I'm mostly talking about votes for Event / Fail of the year categories. It's difficult to understand what someone means if nominations have a form like this: "FAILED TO EARN AND HOLD 1btc", "Situación Actual", "Cancel Culture on social media", "Some exchanges are at war", "Get Your Funds Out of Exchange", "BUY THE DIP AND HODL". (For more information about these examples please check this post.) Besides, please make the difference between what an event is and what a fail is. In the past, some posted same nomination at both categories which is not correct.

Mister BitcoinTalk category was not added, as it would mean to have fillippone winner all the time (on all three places  )

Remember, the contest is about having fun, not a duel for seeing who's da baws Therefore, we are encouraging you all to act honest -- in the end, this is what brings the joy of participation, right?

From this point forward, the official announcement of the contest will be made VERY soon!

Cheers to all

Any time line about Bitcointalk Community Awards yet or is it secret information?

I'm not sure which wallet you were thinking of buying and why it has to be the whole lot of 100 pieces, but for example Trezor currently has a Black Friday sale, where the Trezor Model One is $48. If 30 pieces are enough for the contest, that is significantly below the $7,000 budget you mentioned. Even the latest model, Trezor Safe 3, is in that case affordable at €79 regular price. I don't see any conditions for buying a certain quantity.


Should we start a discussion about the categories of this contest, as far as I remember there were several illogicalities in the last selection. For example, miss Bitcointalk, where we cannot claim for anyone whether they are male or female. Some of the votes were ridiculous the last time. Or even, "antihero", where the nominees for the award are mostly due to negative contributions on the forum. It's a bit strange that someone who left a negative mark in the past year is rewarded financially.



To avoid duplicate Q&A, perhaps you could leave links to previous quiz rounds. So that those interested could check the earlier questions. Honestly, I don't know which quizzes you mean here. I know that there were several, that some users started on their own initiative.

Friends, if anyone has ideas for the 4th round of the quiz (related to the history of the forum), do not hesitate to write to me in a PM.

If the questions/answers for the quiz are interesting and have not been published before, then I will be happy to add them to the new quiz.

Thank you for the explanation.
Yes, being a private sent, the probability of problems is lower.

Regarding the Icarus project, I haven't visited the collectibles tab much, so it escaped me. But I will analyze it carefully, because I'm curious. Thanks. 

If you ask me I would choose to divide $7000 between winners and pay them directly in Bitcoin.
Cold wallets are good to have but winners can always use cash reward and buy cold wallets they want themselves.
There are many cold wallets available in market and many of them are not that good, plus there is additional concern with personal information sharing.

Lol, thanks for reminding me of this. I actually turned down the vip tour mainly because I didn't watch football at that time. Funnily enough, Arsenal is now one of my favorite teams since I started watching the sport (can finally get the brazilian citizenship card!), so I would have taken it today. That decision now haunts me from time to time.

But next year's prize was a hardware wallet and it had to be returned back because of all the import bs laws in my country, so I wouldn't take anything shipped over anymore.

to your first question, as these are sent by me as registered mail and therefore i do not have to declare anything, as is the case with parcels. as far as i know, all users who have ordered/won an Icarus card so far have not had to pay any customs fees

and to your second question, it's not a big deal and i don't blame you for not knowing the project yet, but you can learn a lot about Icarus in the following link
[ANN - INFO] Project Icarus: The forum redemption story 🔐

Since I am a rookie on this forum I understand that my opinion not matter as much as a reputable member that been here for a long time as it should be. But if anyone would ask me I would not have to much winners or to much spread with the money. Example: IMO rather that 70 people winning $100 each then 140 people winning $50 each. Regarding how the prize should be sent am I voting for BTC to the winners wallet.
 

I have no clue how Bitcointalk Community Awards works. But normally in a competition/award its winners and losers, winners get a reward/price meanwhile the losers has to do it better next time.  




Good luck to all participants!

Well first of all I didn't understand why if prize is money ($7000) then it will be divided among the winners only and if it's cold wallets then it will divided between winners and community?

I'm a bit confused i mean if the prize is money, why is it only divided among the winners and not the entire community? Shouldn't the community be included in this too?

Secondly I also agree with joker_josue's suggestion that prizes in BTC would be the best option.

However, if sponsors like Betnomi etc. want to stick with physical prizes, they could be given as vouchers with the option for winners to redeem them directly from the supplier.

Make that one of four then! My recollection was it was theymos, myself, and TryNinja who were offered (and turned down) the prize.

The rule of the previous year was that you must have at least 50 earned merits to vote, so that rule should still stand, unless icopress changes the rules this time around.
The proposal of hardware wallets as rewards isn't only for the winners, 40 hardware wallets is to go to the 'community', and that would include members that have never bought or even used a hardware wallet before.
That's the major problem with sending hardware wallets as a price, if not for this and other logistics problems, it is good to 'encourage' members in this way, to use cold wallets.
Yes, most of us agree on that.

Never knew an award like this existed.
This would be my first partaking in, if Jr member's can vote.
Forgive my ignorance, but I still don't understand emphasis on cold wallet as a reward
Based on past data's, it can be seen that many winners are reputable members of the forum, thus have an higher likelihood of already using a cold wallet
Not to mention enthusiasts of privacy
Sending Bitcoin is still the best;
Its accepted by all
Cheaper delivery especially when sending in batch
Last but not least, it's the predominant currency in the forum.

All the points and arguments come together they are all saying one thing which is the BTC gift tot the winners. Because the second factor is more risk than sending BTC tot the winners. And we all go with the $7000 worth of bitcoin to the winners. Now we are all waiting for Mega Community Award program to kick off soon.