I believe in ICO rating. The first top 3 icorating websites giving the same points to the same projects. So even if you check the first 3 you'll see that the top5 ico's will be almost the same.
But for sure blind trusting is not the choice. You have to make your own research and choose points which is the main for you.
Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 105. (Read 6918 times)
ICO ratings is only a reference for anyone who would like to participate on the upcoming ICO's but you don't need to fully believe on them 100% because it could lead to hype so you must better do your on research about the project before you invest your hard earned money although most of the details are presented on the ICO rating website's.
Sadly no. I wanted to believe ico ratings as I kept checking them before investing. But I basically realized some specific ico devs pay money to be advertised and have greater rating from those sites. It is basically like watching ads on tv, %99 lie and only truth is the price 
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
ico rating can not be used as a benchmark to be able to give a project will be successful. but ico rating can give you an idea of a project that will run by utilizing the site. so we do not have to respond that ico with a high rating will be successful but we have to look at the ico trip is whether it can be successful or not. Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
no, because I think ICO rating does not guarantee that ICO will succeed, there is the ICO have a small rating but ICO is successful.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I dont really believe with these websites,they are just hyping these ICOs probably because they are getting paid from these reviews,its better to do your own research so you can assure that your ICO would achieve success. Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Honestly i do believe in ICO Ratings, but that doesn't stop me from doing my own person research. But there are some icos that might not be rated high or even rated at all but they end up doing very well that icos that were rated high..
So to be on the safe side you can combine your own research with the ICO ratings .
So to be on the safe side you can combine your own research with the ICO ratings .
Yes ico ratings are very important to me everytime i see upcoming ico i will try to look on icobench because most of trusted ico's are rated by experts there.
I personally do not trust any ratings! Correctly pointed out by the author of this theme, there's ICO, which do not have high ratings, but their ICO ends in 2-4 days is an indicator of demand among users. I follow and trust my personal analysis, this is a complicated process and takes a very long time. The only way I can be sure my money will not fly away in the garbage. Never listen to anybody, learn to do the analysis! At first it will seem an impossible task, but after 3-5 projects you will learn how to do it efficiently! I have repeatedly said in their posts that if you decided to deal with the cryptocurrency, then you just need to study it. Without this you'll lose all your money!
I believe it but not 100% because succesfully of the ICO depend on the real product that they have, their community and solid team. ICO Bench and other site given that rating i think just depend other factor not like that i mention it.
Believe on icrodrops website.
I had an experience when investing in ICO, I see on the website ICO ratings and the ICO has a good investment rating. but the result of the ICO is not good, even just the listings in a small market, so do not make the price increases. so now when I want to invest in ICO I don't see the rating of a website, it's only a small reference, the rest I see results of ICO raised, seen the enthusiasm of influencers and analysis of the project.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Yeah I myself were looking at the ICO ratings as my guide or references before I will do my own research, sometimes the rating are bias but as what others say that's there opinion. Consider that all here are business nobody gives it for free. So, do your own research, Google. Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I think all can be a reference in an assessment. I personally, always researching first an ico that I am following before actually join in the investment or project. yes, all became a reference, and not just a rating. if ico it does not have a good concept for what ratting? and possible rating can be bought? so I think we should involve knowledge and experience to determine an ico's judgment.
I think all can be a reference in an assessment. I personally, always researching first an ico that I am following before actually join in the investment or project. yes, all became a reference, and not just a rating. if ico it does not have a good concept for what ratting? and possible rating can be bought? so I think we should involve knowledge and experience to determine an ico's judgment.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Because these ICO rating websites are getting paid from these ICOs,they are just hyping the ICOs so most of the people will invest to them,you are right most of the good ICOs are being under rated by these website because they didnt get any payments from them. Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I usually go to ICObench.com to do my own research for the new ICO that I found on my FB wall. Yes, I believed in ICO ratings specially to those people who gives their own opinions on the said ICO.
ICO rating are quit good as a reference point when I do my own research,Some are background advertiser for ICO,what I do is to check different Review on a project and I make my decision.
It is not bad if you believe in these kind of sources. But I think it is much better if it'll serves only as your reference,you need to prove that a project is good yourself. Research more about the project,check its whitepaper and its developers. Also, I think these kind of websites rated the project they like personally. If you want to know more about the project, ask their manager,just make sure you don't bother the manager too much.
It is necessary to take into account that ICO ratings are made by one or several people and are the subjective judgment of these individuals. For the sake of completeness, it is necessary to familiarize yourself with other websites that publish similar ratings, get acquainted with other information that can be found on the Internet and only then make your own conclusion. Based only on the opinion indicated on one website, it will be wrong. In addition, it should also be taken into account that it is impossible to predict everything unequivocally. There are promising companies with good specialists and brilliant projects failing, while mediocre projects get good support and they all end up getting it. So in this case you need a certain amount of luck.
Jump to: