Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 107. (Read 6918 times)
ICO ratings are only reference that we can use in deciding whether the project has a high chance to succeed or will be supported by the market. Many ICOs are really worth investing and there are also those whom I think will not make it, you can rely in those ratings but better make your own research and observation, at least you can justify well your chosen investment.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
No I don't, I usually use that kind of site to see the list of ongoing and upcoming icos because it's too hard to follow/know them all. After that I will do the research myself because by doing it I won't blame anyone if my investment turn out to be bad. I don't know the standart the use to rate the ico and their opinion and mine might be different so it's the best to do it myself. Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
if calculate by % maybe my trust to ico ratings about 30% .
the other 70% was my own research.
from whitepaper , hype , and also from external news
the other 70% was my own research.
from whitepaper , hype , and also from external news
Icos Ranking only provides information about the achievement of ico and hardcap sales that can not guarantee success once it has dropped in the market because investor factors here are at stake. I think ico is just a test of how many investors, the market is unpredictable so if you want to follow ico understand the project and how provocative the team is doing it because it is so decisive
I guess they are doing a superficial analysis , and you should not trust them . My personal opinion . Better to make own analysis and own helpful and will know where to invest
Well, as per my understanding, there is no direct answer for that like yes or no. The rating might be helpful so that we can find the project is real, the team, project scope, future plan are clear and it is not a scam which steels your money and suddenly disappear. But these rating can not clearly say that the rice of token will rise after the release.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I do not believe in ICO ratings. To know whether an ICO will be successful and is legitimate, I personally read their whitepapers and what is the composition of their team. In this way, I can prevent myself from being scammed because ratings are just an average evaluation number of what people poorly knows about the certain ICO. Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I don't usually believe in ICO rankings but they gave us pretty much everything to do our own research on them.
so I use them as a reference of my research about any ICO.
so I use them as a reference of my research about any ICO.
I believe that at the current time these sites and similar are not finalized and represent a subjective point of view, I never pay attention to him
You may gather signals but its best to judge by your own research.
Most ICO rating websites give you enough material for you to dig through independently, BUT they also have a conflict of interest in that they allow payments to list your ICO - so it is in their best interest to list as many ICO's as possible - that can lead to miss information.
I would suggest you take the popular ICO's and inspect it closely, see if it makes sense - or if it is just another pump and dump.
Also, gather information across various sites as this is a very new space, people are using varying methodologies as indicators for value propositions. Some are intelligent - others are not well thought through.
You don't want the tide to go out and leave you standing on the shore with "TRON" for example.
GL!
I would suggest you take the popular ICO's and inspect it closely, see if it makes sense - or if it is just another pump and dump.
Also, gather information across various sites as this is a very new space, people are using varying methodologies as indicators for value propositions. Some are intelligent - others are not well thought through.
You don't want the tide to go out and leave you standing on the shore with "TRON" for example.
GL!
This precisely. If you skim through the announcements a bit you'll find a lot of sketchy ICOs that still manage to get a favourable rating. If these websites are indeed being paid by the ICOs they're supposed to rate (and there is no reason to assume differently) that is a big big big red flag. So X7's advice is a good one: just use them to find links, websites, forums etc and do your own research.
I think that the opinion of experts on these sites is very relative. This is not an objective assessment of projects. In addition, I am sure that you can buy a good evaluation. This is also a bounty campaign. To understand the quality of the ICO, one must try to analyze the project independently. The forum has a lot of information about this. It's not difficult, but you need to love crypto.
I believe in the ICO rating, because the ICO Rating Team has obtained a primer from the upcoming ICO whitepaper of the Telegram Open Network - a crypto initiative that has been said to break the record in terms of hype and investment attention.
Many investors or people believes to the ICO ratings, but I think it is only the opinion and based to the survey of the critics the criticize the ICO. Maybe we should not based to the rating of the ICO but it can help us to guide if the ICO is having a good background and platform in the future. Many ICO that has a low rating but in the end it has a good and successful ICO. They are just giving their idea about the ICO if the whitepaper and platform in ICO is interesting. But it can help us to guide to search some new ICOs and have a great platform. In my advice, sometimes I believe to this because it can help us to search a new and interesting platform to invest with.
Most ICO rating websites give you enough material for you to dig through independently, BUT they also have a conflict of interest in that they allow payments to list your ICO - so it is in their best interest to list as many ICO's as possible - that can lead to miss information.
I would suggest you take the popular ICO's and inspect it closely, see if it makes sense - or if it is just another pump and dump.
Also, gather information across various sites as this is a very new space, people are using varying methodologies as indicators for value propositions. Some are intelligent - others are not well thought through.
You don't want the tide to go out and leave you standing on the shore with "TRON" for example.
GL!
I would suggest you take the popular ICO's and inspect it closely, see if it makes sense - or if it is just another pump and dump.
Also, gather information across various sites as this is a very new space, people are using varying methodologies as indicators for value propositions. Some are intelligent - others are not well thought through.
You don't want the tide to go out and leave you standing on the shore with "TRON" for example.
GL!
I actually don't believe them because they can be easily being promoted by the ICO. When i want to research a ICO i first rate it for my self. How is the team ? What is the project about ?
Always research it by yourself instead of believing others.
Always research it by yourself instead of believing others.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
ICO rating does not give someone a 100% correct prediction about the value of some crypto coin . They just give the "idea" about the weight-age of the coin depending up on its stake holders and the buzz it is creating and its features . They never specify that the profit is guaranteed of you invest in some particular ICO they stated has a good potential .
So do your study before you invest in some coin and do no blindly trust these sites . These sites are just for the references .
Just make sure that ICO rating are being made by trusted site.
For me personally, I keep try to research myself about ICO that I'm looking for and ICO rating just for my additional judgement so it doesn't too important !
Of course with many ICO occur recently , most people especially new trader are difficult to find the promising one, either expert trader !
For me personally, I keep try to research myself about ICO that I'm looking for and ICO rating just for my additional judgement so it doesn't too important !
Of course with many ICO occur recently , most people especially new trader are difficult to find the promising one, either expert trader !
I believe the ico rating site, but by no means entirely a reference to directly invest into a project. We still have to research and discuss, the final results and decisions remain in our hands.
I use ICO ratings sites only as first step in my research. I don't have enough time to check all upcoming ICOs and therefore use ratings sites as a first filter. After I am left with only few promising projects I try to get as deep as possible into them reading everything available. I give big advantage to ICOs that have working product and/or big developer teams.
Jump to: