Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 108. (Read 6918 times)
let just know not everything the ICO rating site shown to us is completely correct. They are only based on the informations they found and they dont know exactly what will happen to the ICO, they can only evaluate based on their assetments, So we should not put to much hope on the Rating Sites, they are just reference tools for an ICO.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Yes, I believe. This is the honest estimation of the project and independent reviews. Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
No! Why would you trust and invest your hardearned money on someone else's take? Would you buy a house that someone on the internet says is a damn good one without yourself inspecting it? Do your own rating thing - look at team, concept and other general stuff while making this assessment.
It Can just give Idea but We Should read Whitepaper and Check ICO Twitter Page and Telegram Group what ICO Admin Doing
How much they are serious about Project in-term of Do they give daily update . Do they care members and Response well
It is Just My opinion
Thanks
How much they are serious about Project in-term of Do they give daily update . Do they care members and Response well
It is Just My opinion
Thanks
I only treat ratings websites as a announcement site as the ICO being rated may have sponsored the post or review. However if an ICO is doing such marketing as sponsored posts on ratings sites, it could be worth the time to do some research on it.
I have discovered some good ICOs on such ratings sites. Recently I have discovered ArcBlock as well as Experty.
However it is still very important that you do your own research and due diligence. I cannot stress enough to everyone that is
participating in ICO that we must do our own research and not rely on review sites or rating sites.
With so many ICOs happening monthly, we should tighten our selection criteria so that we only pick the best to invest in.
If you do your own research, you will find that 4.5 out of 5 on some ratings sites can be worth nothing and it is still the best
to rely on your own due diligence and your own gut in selecting where to invest your money.
I have discovered some good ICOs on such ratings sites. Recently I have discovered ArcBlock as well as Experty.
However it is still very important that you do your own research and due diligence. I cannot stress enough to everyone that is
participating in ICO that we must do our own research and not rely on review sites or rating sites.
With so many ICOs happening monthly, we should tighten our selection criteria so that we only pick the best to invest in.
If you do your own research, you will find that 4.5 out of 5 on some ratings sites can be worth nothing and it is still the best
to rely on your own due diligence and your own gut in selecting where to invest your money.
There's many ICO Rating websites, and most give unbiased ratings and reviews. You should be able trust their rating score because at the end of the day you can review their rating by adding a post below the ICO they have rated. This way the Rating is real and not fake. If a rating or review has been given and it's inaccurate then that site would not be trusted anymore so most rating sites do their best to keep a rating and review as true as can be. Sites like icorating.com, icobench.com, icotoinvest.com are good sites to watch for ratings and reviews.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Do not trust anyone and any ratings , just trust yourself . Just trust your own research. Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
back to yourself.
for me, the ico rating is just as a reference, I do not always use that data to have ICO. sometimes we have to analyze our own ICO that we will choose.
if you ask me whether I believe it or not. ?
maybe I choose to believe
for me, the ico rating is just as a reference, I do not always use that data to have ICO. sometimes we have to analyze our own ICO that we will choose.
if you ask me whether I believe it or not. ?
maybe I choose to believe
Yes ofcourse maybe I thinks some investor basically based on which ICO they need to invest to earn a profit and to dont lose their investment
do not believe in absolute ICO rating pages only rated a small percentage. They rely on the team and the investor. white paper and roadmap. There is no guarantee that the project will scam.
I do not really trust the rating of sites, but I believe the live rating of the participants more. Good reviews, high attendance and positive reviews about the company. For example, I decided to participate in ISO Arcblock, because this project for a short time approached its goal. This project will definitely bring profit. 
I never trusted rating agencies. All their estimates can be only indicative and often do not come true. If you choose from all rating agencies, then it's best to pay attention to digrate.com. Recently, they make me happy with their forecasts.
There is a well known method for ICO investing: do your own research. In the previous year once I've been asked to help one ICO to send some e-mails to different ICO related websites (including listings) and I've discovered that a pretty big part of the ICO ratings are require payments to get your project listed on their website. That comes especialy about the local websites. The mail nesson was that ICO ratings can never be 100% trusted. Ofcourse they may show the grneral hype around the coin but you should always make your own research.
Dont believe anything on internet. Just believe your self and I think check ICO by yourself is better
But most of the time, it's hard for us to judge whether an ICO project is good or bad, and the iCO evaluation website may be have some news that we don't know about. Isn't it? 
Recently I invested in some projects that advised the most famous sites with a rating After that I received a drawdown in the market in 50%
Depends on the source I guess. Most of the time I just use those sites for basic information like Marketcap, percent of coins being sold, etc.
I do like a site called Crush Crypto for ICO reviews though. They've been at it for awhile and have proven to be trustworthy.
I do like a site called Crush Crypto for ICO reviews though. They've been at it for awhile and have proven to be trustworthy.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
for me itself, ico rating is just as a refferer for short detail info about that ICO, high rating ICO at first time is not always a good one, you might found one ICO at first week it got at first page of icobench with a good rating, but eventually if the tokensale are good or even soldout, it rating will keep or even more great than before, but if not its rating will decrease.
instead of just see on ico rating website, i prefer to ask some friend about the ICO
It would seem that the ratings should help people choose projects, but none of us really knows what the project's creators really are, they pay to make us to get good ratings. Therefore, I believe that no one believes in them
Dont believe anything on internet. Just believe your self and I think check ICO by yourself is better
not always, there are twisted, but mostly they are talking about
Jump to: