Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 22. (Read 6947 times)
I choose the bounty campaign not according to the ratings, but I also looked at the ratings. There is a small probability that the company's rating in the rating can be bought
They are some what an indication of what a project is like, just preliminary. A project that scores very low on rating sites is close to be scams in most cases.
you shouldn't trust anything 100% but ICO ratings and reviews give you a solid ground for future research. Some ICOs can be rated very high and yet at the end of the tokensale event, there won't be listed on any major exchange or they won't yield any profit.
My observations about ICO ratings are, new coins recently fall below half of what their ICO ratings was. So I just take ICO ratings as a guide to know about a coin and just a way of familiarizing with any new coin before lunching into the market.
There are a lot of rating organizations! they can not all guarantee the success of a project! in any case, there are not fools sitting there! Rating agents, most of them, are people who have experience of analysis! Before investing in the project, I personally always look at the project team, on their product and on their movements! You should always have a head on your shoulders, and think for yourself, and do not completely trust the rating agencies!
I think that ICO rating is only a reference standard, but most of the time, if the ICO project gives ICO evaluation website advertising, so they can get a higher score, so more time need to know their project
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I think it is just a reference to measure the level of ICO that has been going on. and it can not be used as a benchmark to invest in it. Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
With my personal experience, never trust the ICO ratings given by such websites like ICOBench, ICOtracker etc. Because motst of the sites manipulate the real overview of the ICO and even for some scam ICOs those sites had given 4 out of 5. Therefore always do an own research to decide whether the ICO is real or not
They should not be trusted as i believe some might just collect some sort of money from the developer and hype the project or they might also like to invest in a project and tate it high to have more gain.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I'm reviewing the rating and idea of the project. Rating does not always justify itself. 3.7 I would not say that the average rating is bad. The main idea of the project but the rating also plays a role.
I do not fully believe in the ranking of ICO as the data they provide are not necessarily all true. And much more than we have to return the check. I see in the list ranking the ICO project get high marks but after I check and I followed the project turned out to be stopped in the middle of the road.
Actually using a ICO ratings was the best way to find a good project that we need to participate in the bounty campaign or to invest. Because if the ICO rating of the project was too high it means this project must good to invest.
Well some of them are definitely legit but you should always use your own research to reach the final decision.
I would use it to find ICOs that interest you and then look deeper into the project, look at their whitepaper, their team and ask questions on here. If you are satisfied with the responses, then proceed by investing or taking part in their bounty campaigns.
I use Ico rating as a factor to research a project. But i recommend you use your knowledge to do that, give your opinion to decide that ICO is potential or not, and then invest Grin Be independent, you need it more on this crypto world
Actually using a ICO ratings was the best way to find a good project that we need to participate in the bounty campaign or to invest. Because if the ICO rating of the project was too high it means this project must good to invest.
Of course, I look at sites with ICO ratings. But If I am interested in any project, I will conduct my own research.
In my opinion, all sites with ICO project ratings are aimed only at making a profit. Some of them just sell their positive ratings, someone gets money from advertising on the site, someone for placing projects on their site. And when there is a conversation about making money and about "honest" ratings...
I think that many of them understand that soon people will create something new, and sites with ICO projects ratings will gradually sink into oblivion.
I think that many of them understand that soon people will create something new, and sites with ICO projects ratings will gradually sink into oblivion.
I don't trust any of the big websites, obviously in it for the cash.
I think that it is possible to select those projects that are already a little bit popular, but from those chosen obovariously you need to do another analysis but already personal because you still trust more than sites!
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
yup. They really make sense. Because that what makes them credible. Not only for the ICO but for the other things as well. That is the way we trust somethings.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Those ico rating is not totally accurate because many ico project have successful ending but they give a low rating or give a high rate but in the end the project is scam. Maybe they basing on white paper of the project. That's why we need own research to every ico that we want to join. Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Jump to: