Pages:
Author

Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 20. (Read 6921 times)

member
Activity: 294
Merit: 14
July 19, 2018, 09:36:18 AM
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.


At first yes. But not anymore. Not all ICO ratings in those website are true. Have you read the news abour ICObench? There was an issue about ICO experts being bribed by developers for high ratings. Also, I have proved that not all ICOs with high ratings have good token values. I don't want to drop the names of the ICOs I have encountered but I know quite a few.
sr. member
Activity: 1722
Merit: 252
July 19, 2018, 09:30:08 AM
I think the ICO rating is the easiest clue to determine whether the ICO has good prospects or not, and I always make the ICO rating a measure and certainly not only from one source rating but at least 3 ratings.
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 550
July 19, 2018, 08:48:15 AM
In most cases, the problem of rating web-sites is the questionable quality of the proposed analytics. Now all rating teams have the same difficulties associated with the lack of qualified personnel. Whichever figures the crypto-currency market operates with, we can see high-level analytics only when international rating brands enter this market. It is just one of references, i always do my own research on the project i want to invest in. But i think ico ratings site like ICOBench is good, you can check the summary and KYC project of the token. Most ratings might be wrong or might not go as planned. Some ICOs can be rated very high and yet at the end of the tokensale event, there won't be listed on any major exchange or they won't yield any profit. In a word - this is a good criterion, but this is not enough. Just trust your own research.
member
Activity: 406
Merit: 21
July 19, 2018, 08:42:59 AM
I do not trust sites that set ratings for crypto projects, but only make the decision, and it's better not to invest if you are not sure about the crypto project.
newbie
Activity: 70
Merit: 0
July 19, 2018, 08:36:29 AM
I'm assessing the company's prospects .I read carefully and study .  I believe in ICO rating .
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
July 19, 2018, 08:35:55 AM
We also should not be too trust in these websites. The best result is when we do our own research on the project that we will invest. So  the ico rating website is just one of our references when we going to do deeper research on a project.
newbie
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
July 19, 2018, 08:32:39 AM
Honestly not because the rating from ico I think only a few predictions of a blockchain that is still not accurate in my opinion and this still needs a better update again for the future. other than that the rating of an ico does not guarantee the altcoin launched by ico is potentially despite its ico success.
member
Activity: 252
Merit: 12
July 19, 2018, 08:31:11 AM
Yes i do believe in ico ratings but those are just some people's insight how about other people , which means the coin is good but it doesn't mean that this will pump or this will moon .
newbie
Activity: 88
Merit: 0
July 19, 2018, 08:29:32 AM
Most of them aren't very trustworthy, either the site itself or the guys rating them are taking bribes.
newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0
July 19, 2018, 01:45:37 AM
People always run in the crowd.
When people trust and refer to projects at the ICO website.
Then I think it is reasonable that investors always want to know about a project and it is appreciated by the knowledgeable people.
Undervalued projects will not be of interest to investors and vice versa.
jr. member
Activity: 200
Merit: 1
July 19, 2018, 01:40:20 AM
You need to understand how the rating is given before trust it or not. Some ratings site just use a check list to see whether certain items like telegram group, whitepaper exist or not. These are far less useful then sites that actually trying to understand what the project and potential is, such as crushcrypto and in some case even some youtuber are better. But it's best using ratings as reference, some youtuber could be ranking the coins as the best ICO because they already negotiated presale discount and invested a lot of money in it. End of day we make our own decisions. Personal opinions not financial advice
newbie
Activity: 105
Merit: 0
July 19, 2018, 01:36:26 AM
I never believed in ico ratings. I know the darkness behind it. As long as you give money or the rating agencies are on good terms. You can get a high grade.
member
Activity: 155
Merit: 10
July 19, 2018, 01:30:41 AM
I don't believe on them anymore, most of them are fake and just paid reviews to some of the sites that are offering ratings. That is why i am always tryign to avoid checking them before investing in any kind of project, because i only trust on my knowledge
sr. member
Activity: 424
Merit: 250
July 19, 2018, 01:28:41 AM
Quite a bit. My confidence was blown after I found out the story about how buying feedback about the projects on these rating sites.
hero member
Activity: 2436
Merit: 503
Cryptocasino.com
July 18, 2018, 06:45:57 PM
I trust the ratings. But every time, I try to conduct an additional independent analysis of the project in order to understand whether it is worth investing in such a project.
- I think you should not trust too much on the rating, you should trust your analysis as what you are doing before investing because everything in crypto can be faked, information from the rating can be faked very easily as long as you have money. In my country there are always the same situations, product owners pay for other people to spread the goodness of the product, this is a great strategy, it attracts a lot of people despite the product is not as good as what it is advertised.
So many people are lazy to DYOR. that's why the majority of them are getting scammed caused by scam icos that paid the ico rating site to give their scammy project a good rating or even the best rating.
At least the project must have MVP before try to create any ico.
full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 100
The Protocol for the Audience Economy
July 18, 2018, 06:39:17 PM
Not all sources behave honestly. Many of them are ready to higly appreciate even a useless and stupid project for money. So you should always rely only on your own knowlegde.
jr. member
Activity: 70
Merit: 1
Blockchain with a Purpose
July 18, 2018, 02:29:59 PM
Definitely no, I don't believe any ICO raitings. I think that people should have some analytic skills, and decide for themselves, without any help.
member
Activity: 154
Merit: 10
July 18, 2018, 12:54:42 PM
it depends on which website you visit and the author of the newspaper. I suggest you should access in some good websites such as hacked.com to read the review. They can give you about 80% good advice
newbie
Activity: 115
Merit: 0
July 18, 2018, 12:32:43 PM
I view this as an additional criterion in the choice, but I do not consider it to be the main and fundamental one. For a picture as a whole, it's worth paying attention to it.
hero member
Activity: 1302
Merit: 503
July 18, 2018, 12:11:13 PM
I trust the ratings. But every time, I try to conduct an additional independent analysis of the project in order to understand whether it is worth investing in such a project.
- I think you should not trust too much on the rating, you should trust your analysis as what you are doing before investing because everything in crypto can be faked, information from the rating can be faked very easily as long as you have money. In my country there are always the same situations, product owners pay for other people to spread the goodness of the product, this is a great strategy, it attracts a lot of people despite the product is not as good as what it is advertised.
Pages:
Jump to: