Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 43. (Read 6918 times)
I don't believe in the ratings of ICO, but the information collected there allows me to very quickly make an analysis of the project team and other very important things needed in order to understand whether to invest in the team and its ideas .
yes it is true, sometimes the rating does not guarantee the outcome of the project, there are some projects with big ratings but failed to continue the development of the project, but there are projects with low rating able to reach the target and continue the development of the project.
So we should not rank as the main benchmark in assessing a project, we should also assess the other aspects, such as WP, Management Team, Advisors, Roadmap, and Community projects.
So we should not rank as the main benchmark in assessing a project, we should also assess the other aspects, such as WP, Management Team, Advisors, Roadmap, and Community projects.
I don't believe to sites with ratings. I think they just sell it to ICOs. But maybe I'm not right. I do not have any proof of this.
Of course they do, you don't need a proof for that because all those bad ICOs with good ratings are proof enough.
I don't believe to sites with ratings. I think they just sell it to ICOs. But maybe I'm not right. I do not have any proof of this.
Can refer to, but I will not fully believe that, because most of the time rating agencies and project parties have a certain degree of dark transactions, but there are a lot of information in the rating report can be queried, through which you can judge the quality of the project
When not all of the ico ratings are legit, there are a couple right ones.. I do like those legit platform for checking the correct and solid project. Don't just rely on the rating of an ICO. You have to do your own effort and check social media feedback and the team behind the ICO too. I like this one Ftec ICO, because it is very solid if they deliver on their promise: https://ftec.ai/
I only use those sites as guide though if there's an ICO I am interested in participating. As OP said, an ICO could be good at first but things can go wrong in the end so better to guard yourself by checking everything about the ICO before joining the presale.
Usually I don't trust such websites with ICO rating, because in most cases they are get paid for this. But there's one recourse icodrops.com which proved to be very reliable. And most of there rating are based on there own investigations. I think this is the best ICO recourse now.
I would not trust the either for the same reasons stated above. You don't know how independent they really are, so they are nothing more than one out of many indicators for a project. And these sites have also been wrong many times so you really can't use them as a substitute for doing your own research.
Sometimes yes, sometimes no. ICO ratings are just done by those company who rates ICO and I don't see why or how the profit in it. Sometimes I don't believe in ICO ratings because I think some of them are being paid by some ICO just to have a good to excellent ratings.
Yes. This is a fairly good ico review site, quite standard criteria. Not more than 90-100%, but it is also much better than other ICO sites like icobech or ico tracking. So icorating is also a pretty good choice. can trust. But does not up 100%, the choice is still by myself
I believe on ICO rating but not totally 100 % , ICO ratings can help bounty hunters and even investors to choose a good bounty and an ICO where they can invest their time, money and efforts.
Personally, I believe in ratings, and I use them often. Ratings help me to choose a project for investment and to participate in bounty companies. Most of all, I use the resource icoholder. Recommend!
Actully I don't believe immediately in the ico ratings of the project in icobench. I will agree only on their ico ratings after I finished reviewing spcific projects. One of my tool that can help for detailed review of the project is icoholder and this is like icobench.
I saw a Medium post about how easy it is to pay for expert reviews and other work arounds. So no cant trust completely.
I like the ICO rating sites for being able to give you a quick overview of a project and helping you to find the resource locations for a project. At the end of the day the review scores come from the opinions of the "experts" so I would still be inclined to do my own research to complement what I read from them.
Well, how to say,trust but verify)Better course look myself,the company and its prospects,but I'm sure one will say now, regardless of how interesting the project,the team,how cool is that,any project now after ISO umatyvaet just shit in the bottom of the charge of such a tactic these people who trample down
no, but I believe in new crypto projects that have a future like that of Socratus
I think that you should not rely on the opinions of such sites. The rating there is built on the opinion of the majority of ppl, and there is like 100 new ICO's each month now, so it is impossible to track them all, and i think these rating sites based on selling advertising, so no need to believe just for rating, always make your own research before investing
I agree, this ratings could be good as your second opinion or option to see how they rate that particular ico. I am firstly doing my research and reading next is to find reliable informational materials and go with ico ratings. Some of their reviews was biased or not good because manay good ico was a low rating for them and that is not so much good to invest some of it was on top rated.
as for me, the ICO ratings are most beneficial for me because before investing in any ICO first of all I will check the ratings and reviews of that particular ICO and then i will invest
I think that you should not rely on the opinions of such sites. The rating there is built on the opinion of the majority of ppl, and there is like 100 new ICO's each month now, so it is impossible to track them all, and i think these rating sites based on selling advertising, so no need to believe just for rating, always make your own research before investing
Jump to: