Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 45. (Read 6918 times)
I slightly trust them, I look at them and do my ICO analysis, because often ratings are bought. And all decisions must always be made by myself!
There is no not believe and advise everyone not to believe in this on stilts especially icobench , on this site all selling experts . dokazatelstva have long walk on the Internet
Yes, I often look at the ratings. And my choice of project depends on similar ratings. But I also conduct an independent analysis of several projects.
Of course I do. But you need to take the ratings correctly. For me, ratings are primarily a way of earning their organizers on the sale of seats in the top. and only then the method of informing. Also, by studying the rating tables, you can draw conclusions about the availability of money from certain campaigns.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
No, I don't. Prefer to make own judgements based on my own researching. In order to pick up a worthwhile project, just pay attention to what makes any project being a real project:
- understandable and reachable idea and/or concept (something, what is gonna be useful/used by you/used by loads of people);
- solid wp and understandable roadmap;
- website;
- presence of MVP;
- linkedin profiles of team members (they in their turn must be very experienced and competent in the area they're working in);
- media coverage;
- active community support, etc.
These are the criteria of a promising and successful project, including one my most favorite - Cryptics. Check it out, it's the example of a trustworthy project
People often see that they are actually checking the real ico ratings as one of their referrals which are most selective to investors, but for me ico rating is one is just a guide and I'm not really believe in how quickly they rate some icos. But that would still depend on the willing investors how they would believe in this ICO rating.
You should refer only to themselves and to their knowledge, these ratings can be purchased. I do not advise you to trust these sites.
They are probably paid by the ICOs to promoted them as the tops projects out there, instead you should go look for yourself and try to evaluate an ICO depending on what you want, also check their website, social media and team.
In the last time, these ratings cause more and more doubts. It is possible to give a lot of examples-projects that had the highest ratings from experts, but in the end failed miserably.
But they should not be completely trusted either. In this ranking, as many and excellent projects. You can evaluate, study a particular project, and already decide whether to invest in it or not.
In the last time, these ratings cause more and more doubts. It is possible to give a lot of examples-projects that had the highest ratings from experts, but in the end failed miserably.
I have watched some top rated projects on ICOrating making good return, however they might be wrong sometimes, because in crypto you can't be right in all situations.
Some of acceptable internet pages for many of us searching for the decent and proper new cryptos are ICO Drops and other comparable technical pages.
No, I totally do not believe in that. Maybe they collate together to make beautiful numbers. So do not believe that we will become better if we believe in it blindly.
I believe ico ratings are overall great reference to start reading, there are many links to specific icos and also how much money or coins they already collected etc.
No, I do not believe such ratings. Often they display untruthful information and deceive many people. You should be very careful when choosing a company if you use the rating.
I do not always believe in ICO rating. I will choose ICO which I think will have a future. ICO rating is merely a formality. We need to carefully study the whitepapers that they make and note the roadmap so we can estimate the strategies they may be taking.
Yes, I trust some notable rating websites like ICO bench and ICO drops. Those two websites have experts that do the rating and its not just ordinary rating. The experts are well experienced about initial coin offering.
I am using www.icoguide.com for the selecting of good projects, but final decision should be taken by ourselves, as there is not guarantee that even experts are not mistaken. Rating platforms are more like filters.
In this market, I very much want to find an organization or an individual to trust him and give me guidance. Therefore, many people will choose the rating agencies. If they score very high projects, they will invest a lot, but the result is still a loss. So I don't believe them anymore. I just made them a reference.
I understand that all those rating can be bought by projects, but anyway when I’m going to participate in any project, I take rating into account.
Jump to: