Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Well, it can be optimistic on what its ICO really demands for the investors and participants making there rating are above expectation to other but there should re-analyzing the ico before you do it start participanting if its true base on your observation and result then its good.