Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 52. (Read 6918 times)
i believe but i don't invested just look at the ratings. this is stupid dude, things not that easy.
All these rating sites aren't reliable and in fact we can't actually tell what's their basis to say it isn't risky and some are just a pure hype. Otherwise, nothing beats a diligent research before joining any ICO especially now scam is evitable from everyone. Better be more cautious than be wary.
Exactly!! Dont trust any ico rating website because theres no guarantee this is accurate no basis to tell so its better to do your own research if you are interested to invest in some ico project, invest only to the project that have a great team and white paper!!
All these rating sites aren't reliable and in fact we can't actually tell what's their basis to say it isn't risky and some are just a pure hype. Otherwise, nothing beats a diligent research before joining any ICO especially now scam is evitable from everyone. Better be more cautious than be wary.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I can hardly believe in ratings of ICOs. First of all it is almost impossible to analyze objectively every particular project and ICO terms. Moreover information on the site could be paid for and doesn’t represent true data.
I think a website like ICObench, ICOrating only as one of the reference factors when we will invest on a project. The best result is when we do our own research on the project that we will invest.
I think websites like ICObench, ICOrating are just as one of the reference factors when we are going to invest in a project. The best result is when we do our own research on the projects we will invest, because the high rating is not a guarantee of success for the project.
Mostly, ICO rating sites have criteria they use in conducting their reviews, ranging from the team members, project quality, whitepaper and some other factors... I think some rating site such as icobench and icodrops could be trusted. But it is also advised that individuals do indepth research in prospective ICO's you're willing to invest.
ICO Ratings can be very useful and beneficial in providing a general overview of the ICO, some of these sights are quite accurate, but not all tell the true story and potential of the ICO, remember, these are independent sights that might be influenced, so before you put your trust in them and use their take as a guide to invest, carryout your own research, it will be more helpful you knowing where to put your moneys
ICO ratings of different websites must be used as a reference guide only we don't trust fully and try to make our own efforts to screen those top ICOS, support team must also be considered in choosing a legitimate project to invest.
yes i do believe on the ratings, its been compile from many different sources
the only reason why this coins sometimes dont go as what the rating,
is because there are lots of whales holding the coins, and they are manipulating
it, in return, the coins becomes worthless, and no one loose interest on the
coin it happens everytime whales controlled most of the tokens, and its bad for the community
the only reason why this coins sometimes dont go as what the rating,
is because there are lots of whales holding the coins, and they are manipulating
it, in return, the coins becomes worthless, and no one loose interest on the
coin it happens everytime whales controlled most of the tokens, and its bad for the community
If you use the expert rating, it is not an objective opinion. If the rating is targeted program of specific data on investment risks, development team, escroy, and to the rest, it is the surest way. 
Yes I do believe in ico ratings and this is the important things or aspect prior to invest on ico.
Here's the below aspects and elements that need deeper examination for proper investing research. 👇📝
>Personnel/ or developer (team, credibility, track record, history)
>Whitepaper (fundamental purpose, vision, mission & story timeline)
>Coin Supply (max/min capped, burned coin)
>Thoughtout Realistic Timeline (roadmap)
>Use Cases (how practical is the application to be used, its tradable value and unique selling claim to fame)
>Communication Channels (community)
> Rules, Laws & Regulations (pertaining on ICO crowdfunding).
Goodluck. 😎👍
Here's the below aspects and elements that need deeper examination for proper investing research. 👇📝
>Personnel/ or developer (team, credibility, track record, history)
>Whitepaper (fundamental purpose, vision, mission & story timeline)
>Coin Supply (max/min capped, burned coin)
>Thoughtout Realistic Timeline (roadmap)
>Use Cases (how practical is the application to be used, its tradable value and unique selling claim to fame)
>Communication Channels (community)
> Rules, Laws & Regulations (pertaining on ICO crowdfunding).
Goodluck. 😎👍
I do not trust the ratings, because they can not objectively assess the prospects of ICO. In addition, some sites may assign an unfair assessment of the project.
In my opinion, I don't like ico rating. The authority can easily change the rating point. They can personalized their rating. So don't make decisions to see high rating ico.
I am sure that ico ratings are not very important like famous advisors, if one ico has famous advisors that ico has big chance to have very big interst from people, even project are not good if they have famous people that ico is more successful than others.
The ICO rating sites are nearly worthless. I have seen scams that were easily detectable being given positive reviews by ICO rating sites. You should only trust your own due diligence.
Of course you should not trust especially icobench, there are paying experts to raise the score higher, was the project shivom on the bench was a rating of 3.8, he collected the hardcap for 15 seconds
Do not trust these ratings, most of them are not objective. All these ratings can easily be bought and faked.
I believe it is useful as a single source of information, and to get some external reviews. Some websites put this info all over the place making it difficult to find so ICO ratings simplifies the ICO. The ratings itself depends on how many people are reviewing it, the more the better.
ICO ratings are not to be trusted,we have seen a lot of projects with good ratings turning out to be shitty projects with little or no value addition,just nice PR jobs
You dont have another option. You can trust them, I know that who pays is trusted and it is not 100% safe, but but which investment is 100% safe?
Jump to: