Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 56. (Read 6947 times)
No I do not believe it. I do not think the operations there are objective. Generally, scoring is done for commercial purposes. I think, everybody do your own research.
I read the rankings from time to time but I am not totally dependent on them and prefer to compare the various sources. It's even better to do your own project analysis, so at least there'll be no one to blame except yourself in case of ICO failure.
I agree that our own analysis is much better than ready-made ratings, which for the most part look as if they were paid for the promotion of a particular project.
I have seen a ton of projects that got 4.9/5 on ico bench or somewhere around that area and they failed to reach their soft cap. I think even if the rating is good and the project has potential eventually it might not get the necessary funds.
ico rating is for reference only. I do not completely trust it. It can only be partially based on theory. But the reality is quite different. The sale of other ico will depend on the intent of the investor
Yeah, just as a reference only. If you invest in ICOs just because they say so you'll in most cases lose money.
Don't depend only on this websites. Those are just references and we have to do our own researches before selecting an ICO. We can get an idea by looking at the ratings of these sites. But I've seen some project fails although they have high ratings on these sites.
I prefer chatting with quite experienced crypto fans here https://discord.gg/hP7KEy7
No spam, no bullshit. We discuss only awesome ICO projects and how to earn money in this crazy croyptomarket.
No spam, no bullshit. We discuss only awesome ICO projects and how to earn money in this crazy croyptomarket.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
It depends on who's doing the review and the rating. A friend of line told me not to trust ratings immiediately because it may not be true at all. So it's better to research and read more on the trusted companies that provide reviews for ICO's.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I certainly not. The reason is the same as OP have stated. There are some ICOs which are just overrated but when it comes on long term performance in the market, success is absent. while on the other hand, there are those ICOs that despits of the low rating, is making a name in the market. So we have to face the reality that things will happen as expected. Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Many people base their believe on ratings of ICOs on various website, but i personally don't believe in it, because ratings this days has nothing to do with it success, so I make my research at somewhere else.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
for me ICO rating is a good and a great information you can get if you are conducting a research base on the the project performance and upcoming update for the project, you can search for other ico rating website just to make sure all of the information is true about the ratings of the other project.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
SometimesI do believe in ICO ratings because it tells the exact rate of it but sometimes I am not convinced to believe Ico rating because it is far from the exact . Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I personally believe with a rating like icobench as a filter and a tool to convince myself before investing, but we still have to do a thorough research and rating ico only as a survey agency
I don't believe in them that much but at least they somehow give me some help me with my ICO research. After all, we still need these ICO reviews to get the opinions of the so called experts in the market. However, we should not just dwell on these review site's ratings. Their ratings do not assure in any way that the higher the projects get the more successful they will be. Apparently, that is not the case.
I trust this source icodrops,because the projects that they put on their site are often successful.Their specialists conduct high-quality work, deliver truthful information, but in practice, not all things are reliably accurate
I read the rankings from time to time but I am not totally dependent on them and prefer to compare the various sources. It's even better to do your own project analysis, so at least there'll be no one to blame except yourself in case of ICO failure.
ICO ratings are the last thing i will pay my attention to. This is the worst way to analyse ICO. Good projects attract the attention of serious guys from forbes, wallstreet journal, twitter or famous investors like Mark Cuban or Jeff Bezos.
At leas it will attract some attention from ICO shillers like Ian Balina or "The Gob One". But be careful with these guys they can make statements because of the large bonuses on presales.
At leas it will attract some attention from ICO shillers like Ian Balina or "The Gob One". But be careful with these guys they can make statements because of the large bonuses on presales.
ico rating is for reference only. I do not completely trust it. It can only be partially based on theory. But the reality is quite different. The sale of other ico will depend on the intent of the investor
I'm looking into ICO rating, but we cannot believe them for a 100% since as any other rating, they can be bought by ICO owners
There are many ICO Rating sites, and most of them give objective estimates and reviews. You should be able to trust their rating, because at the end of the day you can view your rating by adding a message below the ICO, which they rated. Thus, the rating is real, not counterfeit. If the rating or review was provided, and this is inaccurate, then this site will no longer be trusted, so most rating sites do their best to ensure that the rating and review are as reliable as possible.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Not really, I'm doing my own research! go for the ones that are well presented and have an already established platform. LVN, Sparkster, VirtuePoker and Edenchain are few good projects that I like. Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Do check these out and DYOR instead of believing in 3rd parties.
Jump to: