I think a website like ICObench, ICOrating only as one of the reference factors when we will invest on a project. But we also should not be too trust in these websites. The best result is when we do our own research on the project that we will invest.
So the ico rating website is just one of our references when we going to do deeper research on a project. That's my opinion. Btw sorry for my bad english and thanks!
I don't think ICObench and ICOrating is reliable enough to consider a coin to invest. There are a bunch of scam ICO out there that has a high ratings in different ICOfeed website but fails to verify the identity of the team.
For instance, provided the qouted post of Hellmouth42
ICO Track: 4.7/5
ICO Benchmark: 4.8/5
Holder ICO: 4.2/5
These are very good grades! Would it be possible to have the please links?
Indeed:
- I don't know "ICO track" (I know "TrackICO, but they don't know you)
- I don't know "ICO Benchmark" (I know "ICOBench", but they do not know you)
- I don't know "Holder ICO" - I know "ICO Holder", and they know you!
https://icoholder.com/en/tonal-quantum-network-21443But, here, the result is not very convincing...the team members are "unverified".////
In conclusion, you should base your decision in your fair judgement, not in the ratings of different website.
So that if it turns out to be scam. you won't blame others who only provide information solely and not for financial advice.