Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 86. (Read 6918 times)
i look at the ICO ratings, but at the same time you must look at the project, study the project, and other information. After that you can decide whether should participate in this project. You can not rely solely on the rating.
I don't totally believe in ICO ratings because based on my experiences as a bounty hunter, some ICOs with good conduct and ratings are not all the time becomes successful when they enter the crypto world. But sometimes ICO ratings can help us to choose good ICOs where can we invest our money with.
There are some sites that I trust partly due to their past and unbiased reviews, but even then at the end of the day, only you can make a decision alone.
I always take into account the ICO ratings because they allow to reduce the number of projects necessary for consideration and analysis. So I find them useful and recommend to use them to my friends.
it depends on the rating of the web ico rating, and you definitely know that, why every ico website differs in different value on an ico project. there is a judging from the sale of tokens, or from the team. and I do not really understand that yet. why every ico rating site is different judging.
We are actually in a time, where there are like hundred new initial coin offerings per week. They are so many new projects arround. And its nearly impsossible to get some information about everyone of them. And as a cryptoinvestor, im also always interested to invest in new projects. So these ratings sites like ICOBench and all the others helps me a lot. With those sites, i can sae a lot of time with researching about other informations about those projects. So im happy that there are ico ratings sites who do a small part of the work!
Now many sites offer information about new ICO projects. Therefore, the competition is large and each platform is trying to get ahead. For me, the indicator of good and quality service is the traffic provided by this platform.
I also take into account the popularity of the platform in different countries.
I watch all the news on such this ICO listing websites:
Foundico
ICO Rated
ICO Marks
I also take into account the popularity of the platform in different countries.
I watch all the news on such this ICO listing websites:
Foundico
ICO Rated
ICO Marks
Now a day its easier to manipulate the ratting by paying high commission I feel we should use ICO ratting site for guide only and when it comes to investing we should do our own research as OP said there are some ICOs which got mediocre ratting but still they reached hard cap. Also there are some ICOs which gets good ratting on website like this and collect handsome amount from their token sale. But in the end they exit scamming people biggest example of this SAMFINS they got 4.0 ratting out 5 on ICObench I checked back few months ago but looks like they have now updated the ratting. Also i Would like to mention one site I prefer among all is ICOdrops which have good collection of the project and are very choosy to mention projects on their site.
I trust to ICO rating platforms such as ICOBench and the rating higher than 3.5 on this platform is a great indicator of future success of ICO project.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
No, most of them are paid listings. And I am sure that there is also a market for buying ratings from these so called ico site experts.Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
The best ICOs out there are not listed anywhere imho.
I do not really know that because I did not read icoratings and icobench looking for some ico's because I don't think that they provide ico it will legit and successful so I really appreciated their beliefs to those ico that really matter but I don't really base my expectations to those site.
No for me ICO rating is a fraud and should not believe on it. There are many ICO which relatively has a good ICO rating but still failed the projectn or could not be able to gather a good amount of funds from the crowd. This rating should be taken for granted if ever you will going to invest in an ICO project and should not be taken as part of evaluation process on joining cryptocurrency. Too bad for the people who believe on it.
Well I don't believe in ICO rating sites, the rating are been done by few people and it is been done based on their opinion and their experience so far in ICO investing, also it is worthy to know that most the ICO rating site collect some money to list projects on their site so meaning if they pay huge, they will give them high rating, I remember Benebit ICO that turn out to be a scam, you won't believe it was listed on ICO rating sites with high rating point. SO I don't really believe on all these ICO rating sites best bet is to do your due diligence.
I'm looking at sites with ICO ratings just to understand which ICOs are currently undergoing. If I'm interested in any project then I will conduct my own research.
Judging how good a coin is, one should not depend only on ratings given by different sites, its fine if need some overview of the project that what different advisor thinks about it. Ratings given by experts are mostly based on the project roadmap their white paper, team etc. maybe the project is strong enough to get 4+ rating, but what if the projects reach the hard cap and the team won't work enough on the project as promised in the roadmap? So it's of no use, the token/coin won't gain enough in value that it deserves. People should research thoroughly on team background & experience because they are the ones to work on the project and make it successful and took it to heights.
Some of these ICO sights might be useful as they provide information on coins and give lots of information about them that might turn out to be useful. Some however do not reflect the exact situation in the market as the coins may not be what they purport to be, therefore the information offered may not be as authentic as they should be. These sights might be important , but i suggest you don't make decisions based on the information you get from them
Well, there are two sides to every coin (no pun intended). We,at Kryptos.com, trust most of the big ICO rating sites, but we would always make our own due diligence and we would look for at least 3 different reviews by different people/organizations/sites. An ICO review is a good stepping stone to point out the things you should look for when doing your own research but its just that - a frame to help your further research on an ICO. Some of the things that you should look for are the team,the competition,the main idea of the project,if the product solves a real life problem and if it will be used in the next 2,5,10 years. If there is an issue with any of those factors, then the ICO will probably fail misserably, and even if it doesn't - its not worth risking your money. Hope this helps !
I do not believe in ICO ratings, but you can find a lot of useful information on such sites. The best rating is the one that he himself made.
I believe in a website that creates a rating for an ico that is doing its sale. in my opinion there is no fraud in the rating, they give good rating if ico is indeed good. if you do not trust, maybe you have your own ico rating with some research you make
yes, i always believe in ico rating. I always believe in projects planned by ico and will be successful.
Jump to: