Topic: Do you support direct payment in ETH for bounty? (POLL) - page 5. (Read 2640 times)
I do prefer this strategy of direct payment in ETH for bounties so that we can receive it much sooner and exchange it unlike tokens. Using tokens of their project is good too, it just takes a bit longer to be distributed and to be on an exchange.
To be honest, it really doesn't matter. I personally like participating in bounty programs of projects that I believe have a future. Naturally, I would hope that the these token values would increase after the ICO.
I didn't vote. Simlply because the choice i was looking for in the poll wasn't there. Which is the privilege to choose whatever you want to receive. Wether the coins or tokens that the project you are working under will be your payment for the services you give or ethereum. This to me is very important. Since i do not want 50/50 of any nor want ethereum only. Because obviously, i only work for projects that i truly believe in.
These are my thoughts.
These are my thoughts.
i dont care much in what token you will get your bounty, i just want to get what was promised for my input into rising awareness about the project
No I don't support payout in ETH. Here's my reason: If every bounty pays out in ETH, every bounty hunter will participate in every bounty, be it a good or bad bounty. This is due to the fact that ETH is more sought after by crypto enthusiasts. Also, I think this will force ICO's to set aside part of their ETH raised to be given to the bounty community, instead of using it for development and such. Giving their own tokens is much better as it is essentially free for the company to mint their own tokens compared to giving their already raised funds. Just my two cents. Cheers!
Thank you for your opinion. It's quite rational and I agree with many. I want to draw your attention to the fact that a non-standard and reasonable solution proposed GUTS Tickets on this issue. They offered bounty participants all 3 options to choose from, but after their ICO has already ended. Moreover, at the moment, they offered only to vote, after which they decide to leave all these 3 options for implementation or change something. I admire this approach. This solves many contradictions in this matter and at the same time it looks very fair in relation to the project supporters, if they honestly report on the results of voting, of course
Returning to this thread, I want to report that the other day GUTS Tickets announced the possibility of receiving payment for bounty in ETH, instead of GET tokens.
That is, participants can choose. I was a participant of this bounty campaign and in response to such a proposal I asked the team about the possibility of choosing a payment of 50\50 for the participants. The team paused for deliberation now. As soon as I receive fresh information - I will write here again.
In any case, this is a good call. As I wrote earlier, I think, that the list of such projects will grow.
I want to note that GUTS is a strong project with already well-working product. It's nice that team make such a step.
Quote
Hey everyone! If you have participated in GUTS / GET Protocol bounty campaign and would like to recieve Ethereum right away instead of GET tokens from ICO price, contact @kasperkeunen from GUTS team.
That is, participants can choose. I was a participant of this bounty campaign and in response to such a proposal I asked the team about the possibility of choosing a payment of 50\50 for the participants. The team paused for deliberation now. As soon as I receive fresh information - I will write here again.
In any case, this is a good call. As I wrote earlier, I think, that the list of such projects will grow.
I want to note that GUTS is a strong project with already well-working product. It's nice that team make such a step.
Well, probably my request was heard and GUTS team proposed a form for voting like our vote here
But they expanded the option 50\50, suggesting what percentage of the participant wants to get in ETH and what in GET tokens. Multiply 10%.
Now the participants vote and on the basis of the results of this vote the team will take the final decision regarding the form of payment.
I hope that they will eventually make payments according to the completed forms and will not cancel this offer.
Although, of course, the initiation of such a poll is already a positive sign and it's worthy of respect.
I participating in bounties from the end of September 2017 and after many projects can say, that more important to get your reward at all. Etherium a stable coin and I'm calm to get payments in such way.
I think it would be refreshing to pay in bounties, the issue is that ETH is valuable and during the ICO, the alt coin only maybe has a future value.
I don't think ICO's want to pay out in ETH when they can allocate some of their coin / token for bounties.
I don't think ICO's want to pay out in ETH when they can allocate some of their coin / token for bounties.
No I don't support payout in ETH. Here's my reason: If every bounty pays out in ETH, every bounty hunter will participate in every bounty, be it a good or bad bounty. This is due to the fact that ETH is more sought after by crypto enthusiasts. Also, I think this will force ICO's to set aside part of their ETH raised to be given to the bounty community, instead of using it for development and such. Giving their own tokens is much better as it is essentially free for the company to mint their own tokens compared to giving their already raised funds. Just my two cents. Cheers!
Returning to this thread, I want to report that the other day GUTS Tickets announced the possibility of receiving payment for bounty in ETH, instead of GET tokens.
That is, participants can choose. I was a participant of this bounty campaign and in response to such a proposal I asked the team about the possibility of choosing a payment of 50\50 for the participants. The team paused for deliberation now. As soon as I receive fresh information - I will write here again.
In any case, this is a good call. As I wrote earlier, I think, that the list of such projects will grow.
I want to note that GUTS is a strong project with already well-working product. It's nice that team make such a step.
Quote
Hey everyone! If you have participated in GUTS / GET Protocol bounty campaign and would like to recieve Ethereum right away instead of GET tokens from ICO price, contact @kasperkeunen from GUTS team.
That is, participants can choose. I was a participant of this bounty campaign and in response to such a proposal I asked the team about the possibility of choosing a payment of 50\50 for the participants. The team paused for deliberation now. As soon as I receive fresh information - I will write here again.
In any case, this is a good call. As I wrote earlier, I think, that the list of such projects will grow.
I want to note that GUTS is a strong project with already well-working product. It's nice that team make such a step.
I fully support the full or partial payment for participation in ICO in bitcoin or in ethereum. This will somehow protect the payment for participation, for example, in the signature campaign, from the full reduction in the price of tokens after they enter the exchange for trading if the project is unclaimed. Now I am participating in the Milkcoin signature campaign, which fully pays for the campaign participants signature payments in the ethereum.
Thanks for your information. I already added this project to the list in my initial post.
Thank you for reporting this. I have already deleted this project from the list.
I fully support the full or partial payment for participation in ICO in bitcoin or in ethereum. This will somehow protect the payment for participation, for example, in the signature campaign, from the full reduction in the price of tokens after they enter the exchange for trading if the project is unclaimed. Now I am participating in the Milkcoin signature campaign, which fully pays for the campaign participants signature payments in the ethereum.
Thanks for your information. I already added this project to the list in my initial post.
It would be nice if the user himself chose the payment options - completely in ETH, half with the generated token or completely in the tokens.
So it would be good from all sides. However, I'm not sure that this is possible. This will be additional work for the staff serving the ICO campaign. However, the idea as a whole is not bad. In addition, it is necessary that payment in the ETH would be every week, as it is done in companies with payment in bitcoin or partially in bitcoin. This will be a certain protection against fraudulent ICO.
So it would be good from all sides. However, I'm not sure that this is possible. This will be additional work for the staff serving the ICO campaign. However, the idea as a whole is not bad. In addition, it is necessary that payment in the ETH would be every week, as it is done in companies with payment in bitcoin or partially in bitcoin. This will be a certain protection against fraudulent ICO.
I fully support the full or partial payment for participation in ICO in bitcoin or in ethereum. This will somehow protect the payment for participation, for example, in the signature campaign, from the full reduction in the price of tokens after they enter the exchange for trading if the project is unclaimed. Now I am participating in the Milkcoin signature campaign, which fully pays for the campaign participants signature payments in the ethereum.
Thanks for your information. I already added this project to the list in my initial post.
I also support for this direct eth payment for the bounty but I think ICO's will also give their token as payment for the bounty so it also good for us bounty participant.
im too , if they send use eth for bounty participants payment its good for their token quality (not dumped by bounty participants) , but not all bounty participants will dump their token , i believe mostly person receive their token then hold and trust their project because they think the token price will rise more than ICO price.just my opinion , but receive bounty reward using eth it is a good method too.
Make bounty winners stakeholders in the project. Pay them partly in ETH and the token. It'd make sure they don't just money off the project and abandon it.
Exactly! This is what really good projects worth hearing and reasonably use. Thank you for your opinion
I fully support the full or partial payment for participation in ICO in bitcoin or in ethereum. This will somehow protect the payment for participation, for example, in the signature campaign, from the full reduction in the price of tokens after they enter the exchange for trading if the project is unclaimed. Now I am participating in the Milkcoin signature campaign, which fully pays for the campaign participants signature payments in the ethereum.
Thanks for your information. I already added this project to the list in my initial post.
Make bounty winners stakeholders in the project. Pay them partly in ETH and the token. It'd make sure they don't just money off the project and abandon it.
I think this will be the best. Exchange union tried it and this single strategy saved their coin from being dumped. Today XUC is now trading on positive change in percentage (+%) All bounty hunters that worked for Exchange union were all well paid for their efforts and every one was happy. Just take Indorse for example who paid hunters with their coins that turns out to only 2USD for bounty of 8weeks.
Hey! Thank you for such an important feedback. It's really a great case.
i agree with your idea, using ethereum for bounty payments can be much more easier and faster than bitcoin also less fee charged on every transaction, also more ICO bounties nowaday base on ERC20 that use Ethereum very popular making more and more people are using eth more and more.
Jump to: