Topic: Do you trust ICO Rating sites? - page 19. (Read 9148 times)
i trust ICO Rating sites cuz its a good way to know which ICO for manually check so it will make your job more easy it reallly helpfull
No. In my articles, I recommend not using these ratings. They are used only by young companies. Experienced Bitcointalk users do not use these ratings. This is not an argument.
you are free to see any rating sites and can be a reference for you to make a decision.
but the rating site cannot be the only source that makes you decide to invest or not.
but the rating site cannot be the only source that makes you decide to invest or not.
If you're asking me if I trust ICO rating sites... hell no! all of this sites are being made just to be able to generate money so to make the story short is that this kind of sites are easily manipulated to the interests of certain ICOs who wants to be identified as a legit and promising ICO but to the end all they want is just to commit fraud and scam their investors.
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
I think that one should not trust ICO Rating sites. These sites overestimate the ratings of projects that pay them. At the same time, projects that didn't pay them don't receive high ratings and good reviews. This system is not fair and doesn't provide reliable information. I don’t recommend 100% trust in ICO Rating sites.
Based on the monthly view page from the ICO review sites, I realize that the trend from these sites is getting lower and in the future will not be useful to investors anymore.
I am not sure that they possess objective information. it is very difficult to calculate whether the company will be 100 percent successful.
In any case, users of cryptocurrency need to take into account Chita's decision regarding new ico companies. Even if you personally carry out an analysis of information, this also will not give you an absolute guarantee of success.
I am not sure that they possess objective information. it is very difficult to calculate whether the company will be 100 percent successful.
it's just a number that can't be used as a guarantee that the ICO will succeed. the most important things in the ICO are products and teams because good products will bring in many investors because the progress of the project also depends on the number of investors who join because the project requires a lot of capital to develop the project.
I don't trust everything I see on the internet and ICO rating sites are one of them. I'm aware that some of them charge ICO in order to give them a fair rating so I don't see how their rating won't be biased.
I use to make my own research always before investing, I visit the ICO rating sites just to take another additional idea about the project, but I don't depend only on their ratings. Most of this rating sites give paid ratings and there are a few legitimate ones, like ICObench for example.
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
That is why we should do our own research before investing, we can not go blindly behind anyone in this crypto world and money is our so decision should be our after all. With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
One don't have any other way to consider ICOs for sure they might not be fool proof but at least they can be able to make good predictions that one can consoder. Atleast getting a full detail of a team is a good place to start.
I don't trust the ico rating site, because Io's success is not a problem with IO. it's just a way to attract investors. but I trust a solid and great team for the success of an ico.
ICO rating sites are a good source when you can get a lot of informations and news about the project. Also many ICO rating sites show if the team passed KYC or not - so if a team is real. And that is very good to know, or? 
I think that the best way to analyze this is with my own head, and not to trust ratings, a sufficient number of ratings are just paid. Better to believe user reviews.
I am not sure that they possess objective information. it is very difficult to calculate whether the company will be 100 percent successful.
In any case, users of cryptocurrency need to take into account Chita's decision regarding new ico companies. Even if you personally carry out an analysis of information, this also will not give you an absolute guarantee of success.
I am not sure that they possess objective information. it is very difficult to calculate whether the company will be 100 percent successful.
No, I do not believe that the information which is contained on such sites is 100% true. It seems to me that we should treat such information with great doubt.
in 2017 I strongly believed in the ICO rating because at that time many ICOs who had good ratings would achieve success but in 2018 I no longer believed that because I saw that currently many ICOs have good ratings but fail sales and some are scam
today, the cryptocurrency market has become a label for Easy Seekers. Here they want to earn not only those who work, but also those who want to earn excess profits fraudulently. Based on this, many sites that provide an ico rating for a company can also cheat and give what they want for it, especially for a certain fee from the ico developers themselves. 
in 2017 I strongly believed in the ICO rating because at that time many ICOs who had good ratings would achieve success but in 2018 I no longer believed that because I saw that currently many ICOs have good ratings but fail sales and some are scam
No because I really think that ICO rating is just for promotion they are also being paid to promote the ICO.
I think their ratings are paid and the higher the payment they get the higher the rate they would put in that project.
I think their ratings are paid and the higher the payment they get the higher the rate they would put in that project.
Jump to: