Topic: Do you trust ICO Rating sites? - page 17. (Read 9148 times)
rating of ICO can certainly be used as a factor in determining potential ICO that are good for the future because the higher the ICO rating, the higher the investor's confidence to invest, so that the price can soar when launched in the crypto market.
I do not trust such sites completely, because most of them lie. The information they provide is often false. That is why I try to find good projects on my own.
Just the information on such sites is most often reliable, however, the rating of a project may be purchased. Do not look for the ICO to invest on such sites. More precisely, we should not trust the rating that give the trackers. They can beat not correct or purchased. 
I do not trust such sites completely, because most of them lie. The information they provide is often false. That is why I try to find good projects on my own.
We are happy to have these rating sites, but I don't believe all of them. There are just few of them that I use. Icodrops is one of them
There is no big reason for such sites! I think that they are purely like advertisements, and for this was paid by the campaign!
I am not sure that they possess objective information. it is very difficult to calculate whether the company will be 100 percent successful.
There are many sites which give the trusted information. These official sources can be easily used to check the rating of this or that ICO. For instance, this site is good: https://icobench.com/icos
Never ever trust blindly ICO ratting sites, to take investment decisions do your own research or take proffessinal advice from the experts. This ratting sites takes listing fees from the ICOs to make them visible more on their sites. A must watch vedio for you if you really want to know the reality of the ICO listing site here is the link https://youtu.be/b_fFCdxkHGM
Personally, I do not trust ICO trackers as I personally came across them. For most of them, only one thing is important - how much can you pay them money for hosting your project? This is another type of advertising and nothing more.
People making donations to ICO rating sites can arrange the score they want. Unfortunately, there are people who are dishonest in the crypto world and they are greedy people. I think you do your own research and do not rely on rating sites.
but we also need to look at the ICO rating to make a benchmark for reviewing the project. Even though not everyone is doing dishonestly to the world of cryptocurrency.
People making donations to ICO rating sites can arrange the score they want. Unfortunately, there are people who are dishonest in the crypto world and they are greedy people. I think you do your own research and do not rely on rating sites.
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
When I was new in crypto, the first thing that I do before investing in ICO is to browse and read crypto rating sites. But overtime I have realized that some of these sites sometimes become bias on their sponsors or projects that donate to them. That is why right now I would rather do and review the project myself based on all the information I have gathered about the project.
I take into account the opinion of ICO ratings, but this is not the main criterion. I always look at how the ICO fees are going, whether I like the project, I study the team, their past achievements.
I often pay attention to project evaluations, but I try to personally study the idea and the development team. I have to be confident in the project to invest in it !
No, not entirely... A lot of these rating sites are paid for. If a project pays some amount of money, they are given very high ratings, but these projects goes on to fail woefully.
Well trust estimates don't trust heard a lot of where that assessment bought these , and for example, take icobench I had a project which was estimated at 3.2 there , and gave me the money that is estimated 5 to be envied
From time to time, I am checking the rating websites to ensure, that the ICO, I am going to participate in, is listed on every rating website and has got high ratings. If an ICO isn't listed on Bench, Drops and Marks, I usually do not participate in such projects.
The market is going down, it's very hard for ICO, I saw that many project that couldn't bring ICO to the trading market.
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
You are right dude. I'm as bounty hunter when I participate in bounty, I also check their rating ICO Project. Why I usually check on ico rating platform? because I don't have a time for research their project. Did you see many project scam but they have a good rating on ico rating platform With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
as moderation with release of news and regulation from market and developer to counts of distinct with notable to work on qualification investors might depends on returns with expert decision as supporting strength on option as preparing use with spares on funds to put with submission of exchange with the table.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
I suggest that you don't look at the ratings itself when you have plans on investing your money on ICOs. You are right that some ICO rating website just accept payments from the ICOs so that their project will have ratings to attract certain investors. But do not generalize. There are really some ICO that achieve high ratings because they are a solid team. But a factor that you should always look is the availability and the achievability of the project especially the team itself.
Jump to: