Topic: Do you trust the co-vid19 vaccine ? - page 93. (Read 20317 times)

you were the one saying she didnt go back to work and instead died.
and yet she wrote she went back to work. so its you thats confused.
also again to sort out your confusion she cant write a facebook post while dead. so the ability to write a facebook post shows she was alive

anyway moving on

just reading the first few pages and theres about 1-2 patients per page. so on that record. thats 246 patients.
looking at some of the complaints. its laughable.

but hey if tvbcof does want to exaggerate that vaers only notes 1% of adverse reactions. then ill play his game of 24600 adverse reactions out of more then 4.2mill
so thats still less than 1% reaction rate. even at tvbcofs miscalculation of reporting rate

if tvbcof exaggerated further and said only 0.5% are reported then that would still only be a 1% reaction rate.

but if you read the reactions people had you can still dismiss alot as just crybaby syndrome(snowflake whiners)

so heres some news folks
a vaccine involves a needle so yes expect some arm tenderness pain. doesnt matter what your injected with. needles can still hurt.
a vaccine triggers your immune response so expect immune response. fever/sweats/chills/fatigue. this is normal its showing your body is doing something. as is a mild rash on arm

true adverse effects no one wants but should be looked at are:
anything that lasts more than 3 days
anything that causes breathing or heartrate changes.
dizzyness/feeling weak
headaches(as painful as migraines)
fainting/seizures

this is not new stuff. this is stuff that occurs with may things. the key is that if these persist for 3 days then treat it as an unexpected factor.
the main factor of the adverse reactions are people hypsensitive to allergens

but even with all this advice that has always been public and noted since the beginning. the amount of people suffering from these things is like <1%

You seem a little confused, but that's not unusual.

she wrote a facebook post after death, first hand. wow thats a new skill
.. or she is alive and well and back at work

What can be expected from something slapped together in 10 months when every other took years to make. Every shot of steet heroin is cleaner. Maybe some people deseve it, let them have it.
they come and come
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9111311/Portuguese-health-worker-41-dies-two-days-getting-Pfizer-covid-vaccine.html#click=https://t.co/1jHWsnxrvb

The fraud Dr. Ugur Sahin who made one of them
https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly92aWRlby1hcGkud3NqLmNvbS9wb2RjYXN0L3Jzcy93c2ovdGhlLWpvdXJuYWw/episode/NDdmNjdiZDQtY2I2OS0xMWVhLTgzYjAtNWZhMWVkZjY1NDdj?hl=en&ved=2ahUKEwjuoKLtj63tAhVPxVkKHejwA6EQieUEegQIBxAR&ep=6

By 'back to work' frank1-n-beans means that she is in the morgue down below where she used to work.  At least by the sounds of things from the woman who claims to actually know her situation first hand.

she admitted she had many allergies. (first facepalm)
she admitted the hospital she had the jab. was where she also worked and yet she admit they did not follow the advice of the vaccine administration nor the CDC after care/monitoring

she did not have stevens-johnsons. of if she did a very mild (normal rash) not the stuff tvbcofs duckduckgo image search shows
she was back to work in days

Just looking at some deleted social media posts.  Some user who claims to be a doctor (more credibly than are friend Oileo) says that a friend's daughter who's a PA in New York got 'Stevens-Johnson's syndrome' right after the shot:

HO-Lee Fuckin' sheeiT:

  https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffnt&q=stevens+johnson%27s+syndrome&iax=images&ia=images

Give me Bells Palsy any day!  Looks similar to Transverse Myelitis except for the skin.  Quite honestly it is about what I would expect for some of the autoimmune issues which seem almost guaranteed by this particular technology.

Edit:  Here's the vid.   People can decide for themselves how credible it seems:  https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ub77uE6FA6dG/

Another vid from the same channel is a semi-scrape of data from VAERS.  172 pages of events reported already.  https://www.bitchute.com/video/lHpXeUQIt8XQ/

Here is the dropbox link from their vid to get the PDF of the more full scrape:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/k887ub7q8ap3u5h/The-Vaccine-Adverse-Event-Reporting-System-VAERS-Results-Form.pdf?dl=0

VAERS normally gets about 1% of total adverse events by the way.

which part were lies?
points she states:
advert:
1. that adverse reactions can be coincidence, error in the administration of the vaccine or rare a problem with the vaccine itself
.. all true. all 3 categories are correct

2. robust safety systems. examine the problem and the data nd promptly address the problem
.. all true.

3. communication with many countries
true
..
summit:
1. dis communication with some countries
true. never said there was perfect communication with ALL countries.

2. risk is always there with vaccines and medicines
true. hense the need to monitor this stuff.

some vaccines are made in countries that are not tied to or linked to un/who/other international groups. and so the international groups cant monitor it. and thats the point she is making.
as for countries that do communicate with wh. they get good feedback and involvement with who to ensure risk decreases

a good example is the fact that allergy risk has always been known. its been stated as a risk. and then when some had allergic reactions. they found it out promptly and re-emphasised the advice on people with allergies. and this happened within days. it was not an unknown vector of allergic risk. it was more of a vector of the local hospitals not reading the instructions and not asking people if they have allergies properly.
(advert point 1: administration of vaccine error)
and now with better emphasis on the instructions of administering vaccines. there are less people having allergic reactions

other things like the PCR test. when a lab has bad results that lab is closed off and deep cleaned and resupplied with fresh reagents and tools. this is why if you look at the 'testing capacity' charts you see sometimes numbers go down for a day or two
again due to monitoring of processes this stuff is found out and dealt with quickly

other things like the vaccine trial when someone had a adverse effect in the trial they halted the trial while they investigated. again swift action.

..
yes some countries make 'knock-off' untested medical treatments and can cause more harm and so thats why the world summit want countries to be more helpful in accepting the support of monitoring systems to increase safety.
just look at all the drug overdose deaths from blackmarket dealers that mix cocaine with nasty stuff
stats of dying from blackmarket bad batches are worse by many magnitudes compared to dying from certified medications(research street corner supplied morphine vs medically prescribed morphine)

Actually the Bitchute channel is better organized and more useful than their website (https://thehighwire.com/) which is something of a mess.  No dates or run-times on the vids for one thing which is a real deterent.

Also, they had a nice little 3-minute goodie showing one of Gate's WHO demon-creatures lying out of her ass in a for-useless-eater promo about vaccines.  That didn't appear on their main site at all as best I can see.  https://www.bitchute.com/video/cBy9sKYHJfUo/

Why, exactly, you do what you do isn't clear... even the covering up of things. And you are right when you say that studies already show the results of the vaccine. What you leave out is the crafty, deceptive way that the vaccine companies say that the vaccines are useful and not dangerous (very much).

Since you are unwilling to express the true findings about the vaccines, it would seem that you are promoting evil. It will come back and bite you.

Anybody who thinks that the vaccines are okay things, needs to look here - https://www.bitchute.com/channel/okiFK5CwQrZS/ - to see that they are not.

Well the virus has been deadly to elderly since September 27, 1996


so here

Pfizer has paid $2.3 billion fine for corruption in securing a drug and vaccine licence, and Moderna is a pharmaceutical company producing an antiviral vaccine for the first time and developing it in just 10 months? How are these companies to be trusted?

Why would I cover something up, if it doesn't give me benefits in the first place. Stating factual interpretation is all I am doing, and debunking that statement of yours which is all misinterpretation.

Studies already shows the results of the vaccine, and the only thing that they said is all about the efficacy, and clarifications about how you should protect yourself even after you take the vaccine.

The voices in your head seems to speak louder than before, be careful

The new normal
https://www.laprensalatina.com/mexican-doctor-in-intensive-care-after-getting-covid-19-vaccine/
https://coronanews123.wordpress.com/2021/01/04/health-worker-dies-after-taking-pfizer-vaccine-leaks-show-pfizer-infiltrated-by-agents-of-chinese-government/

Such trickery. The part you are covering up is that it isn't the vaccine doing something. People can be all kinds of percent immune or infecting on their own without the vaccines. That's all the WHO is saying. They are saying that they haven't found that the vaccine does anything.

That's why there is an efficacy rate, it is not entirely impossible for anyone who taken the vaccine to be 100% immune, they still have the chances of getting the virus thus the efficacy rate of 91%, 95%, etc.

In addition, Dr. Swaminathan was taking a stand about doing preventive measures even though someone is already vaccinated.



Misinterpreting the statement just like that is somehow stupid in many ways  

Now we find that the vaccines don't really do anything except make people sick... or kill them.

Watch the video at the site.


Say what? WHO says there is “no evidence” that COVID-19 vaccines will prevent spread of disease… so what good are they?

The 'narrative' is that she simply suffered from a vagal response.  If that is the case than with 1/2 and hour she should be right back to her perfectly normal self and it should not impact work, life, her budding career as a propagandist for vaccines, etc, etc.  Something is rotten in Denmark here.  Looks suspiciously like a Cass Sunstein type operation.

Don't get rope-a-doped on things like this my friends.  There will be a lot of engineered social media operations.  Ultimately they want to get rid of free speech altogether so they are going to be staging phony 'social media' events where they act through 'events' with players playing both the 'victim' card and the 'harasser' card to try to get support for further clamping down on the 1st amendment.

she had an allergy issue. and still went through with the vaccine..
seems simple to me. should have looked at the allergy advice and not proceeded with the vaccine if she didnt want risks.

heck even she is telling people if they have allergy issues. to be aware.
funny thing is the vaccine companies and the hospitals are already aware of it.

but the % of people that have mild or even severe reactions to the vaccine is far less than those that have mild/severe reactions to the virus

but yes the message is very simply. if you have allergies take precautions

what you got to realise is the first groups of people getting the vaccine are majority people with pre-existing conditions. like heart issues. and tiffany fainted due to all the stress of being on stage after having a vaccine.

it was a stress induced faint.
she already had mentioned her heart issues. and so case closed. no more info needed.
the reason she telling people to stop harrassing her and family is because she has already explained the cause and so people need to just move on with their lives
her avoiding re-explaining to every 'karen' 'schitzo' 'conspiracy nut'  is because them people wont listen even if being told 50 times. so they need to just move on
her disapearing is not a new conspiracy mystery that requires more investigating. its that she is getting on with her normal life and so should the nutters