Topic: Do you trust the co-vid19 vaccine ? - page 94. (Read 20577 times)

Why, exactly, you do what you do isn't clear... even the covering up of things. And you are right when you say that studies already show the results of the vaccine. What you leave out is the crafty, deceptive way that the vaccine companies say that the vaccines are useful and not dangerous (very much).

Since you are unwilling to express the true findings about the vaccines, it would seem that you are promoting evil. It will come back and bite you.

Anybody who thinks that the vaccines are okay things, needs to look here - https://www.bitchute.com/channel/okiFK5CwQrZS/ - to see that they are not.

Well the virus has been deadly to elderly since September 27, 1996


so here

Pfizer has paid $2.3 billion fine for corruption in securing a drug and vaccine licence, and Moderna is a pharmaceutical company producing an antiviral vaccine for the first time and developing it in just 10 months? How are these companies to be trusted?

Why would I cover something up, if it doesn't give me benefits in the first place. Stating factual interpretation is all I am doing, and debunking that statement of yours which is all misinterpretation.

Studies already shows the results of the vaccine, and the only thing that they said is all about the efficacy, and clarifications about how you should protect yourself even after you take the vaccine.

The voices in your head seems to speak louder than before, be careful

The new normal
https://www.laprensalatina.com/mexican-doctor-in-intensive-care-after-getting-covid-19-vaccine/
https://coronanews123.wordpress.com/2021/01/04/health-worker-dies-after-taking-pfizer-vaccine-leaks-show-pfizer-infiltrated-by-agents-of-chinese-government/

Such trickery. The part you are covering up is that it isn't the vaccine doing something. People can be all kinds of percent immune or infecting on their own without the vaccines. That's all the WHO is saying. They are saying that they haven't found that the vaccine does anything.

That's why there is an efficacy rate, it is not entirely impossible for anyone who taken the vaccine to be 100% immune, they still have the chances of getting the virus thus the efficacy rate of 91%, 95%, etc.

In addition, Dr. Swaminathan was taking a stand about doing preventive measures even though someone is already vaccinated.



Misinterpreting the statement just like that is somehow stupid in many ways  

Now we find that the vaccines don't really do anything except make people sick... or kill them.

Watch the video at the site.


Say what? WHO says there is “no evidence” that COVID-19 vaccines will prevent spread of disease… so what good are they?

The 'narrative' is that she simply suffered from a vagal response.  If that is the case than with 1/2 and hour she should be right back to her perfectly normal self and it should not impact work, life, her budding career as a propagandist for vaccines, etc, etc.  Something is rotten in Denmark here.  Looks suspiciously like a Cass Sunstein type operation.

Don't get rope-a-doped on things like this my friends.  There will be a lot of engineered social media operations.  Ultimately they want to get rid of free speech altogether so they are going to be staging phony 'social media' events where they act through 'events' with players playing both the 'victim' card and the 'harasser' card to try to get support for further clamping down on the 1st amendment.

she had an allergy issue. and still went through with the vaccine..
seems simple to me. should have looked at the allergy advice and not proceeded with the vaccine if she didnt want risks.

heck even she is telling people if they have allergy issues. to be aware.
funny thing is the vaccine companies and the hospitals are already aware of it.

but the % of people that have mild or even severe reactions to the vaccine is far less than those that have mild/severe reactions to the virus

but yes the message is very simply. if you have allergies take precautions

what you got to realise is the first groups of people getting the vaccine are majority people with pre-existing conditions. like heart issues. and tiffany fainted due to all the stress of being on stage after having a vaccine.

it was a stress induced faint.
she already had mentioned her heart issues. and so case closed. no more info needed.
the reason she telling people to stop harrassing her and family is because she has already explained the cause and so people need to just move on with their lives
her avoiding re-explaining to every 'karen' 'schitzo' 'conspiracy nut'  is because them people wont listen even if being told 50 times. so they need to just move on
her disapearing is not a new conspiracy mystery that requires more investigating. its that she is getting on with her normal life and so should the nutters

At the latest study in regards to the new strain. The graph indicates that 10-19 yrs old have the most cases, second is the 40-49.

And guess what, there are low cases for 60 and above age gap.

Ergo, Age is not significant to the possibility of a person getting infected by the virus.

https://virological.org/t/transmission-of-sars-cov-2-lineage-b-1-1-7-in-england-insights-from-linking-epidemiological-and-genetic-data/576

It simply is never a good idea to damage the outer prodective layer to "shoot-up"
Anyway something is sus with all this young girls
https://www.thespec.com/news/hamilton-region/2021/01/02/hamilton-psw-suffers-rare-but-severe-reaction-to-covid-19-vaccine.html

CDC official report shows 3% of registrants who received first dose were "unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required care from doctor or health care professional"

For those following the Tiffany Dover ('nurse 33') saga, caution is advised:

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YyGlHYTsTk

The vaccine effectively becomes uselles if exposed to a temperature above -70 degrees and even though it was rushed, it was still tested following most of the requirements needed to determine whether it is safe or not. Furthermore it is in the manufacturers' best interest for it to work so I think its safe. But i dont see a reason why a healthy young person would ever feel the need to recieve it. It is good to take it as a last resort for old people with health issues but still, young people have nothing to fear given the circumstances, except if they too have other health issues.

Alarming number of US health care workers are refusing COVID-19 vaccine
https://nypost.com/2021/01/01/alarming-number-of-us-health-care-workers-are-refusing-covid-19-vaccine/?utm_source=NYPTwitter&utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_medium=SocialFlow

Resident fake-doctor Oileo think that people here are to stupid to realize that if a condition occurs at a rate of {n}/year than the expected number of occurrences in a month would be {n}/12.

The genetically re-programmed group had 5 cases of Bell's Palsy and the non-reprogrammed group of a similar size had zero.  Hell, even the corp/gov admitted there is likely a problem here and to keep eye's open for it.  At least early on before the propaganda team suggested to try the 'just chance' lie because the sheeple are mostly stupid enough to buy it if someone in a lab coat says it on Dr. Phil.

Oxford (Astrazeneca) puts DNA into the cell nucleus then gets the cell itself to pump out m-RNA.  In this manner they don't have to pump so much RNA into the victim.

Medicine is all about reading what the medical/industrial complex approves then regurgitating it for exams and for writing prescriptions.  There is no better teacher for basic entry level medical stuff than this guy, and here is his re-hash of Moderna, Pfizer, and Oxford respectively.  I'm sure it's relatively accurate as far as it goes, and it is interesting and worth the watch.  At least you won't make basic errors as you have above:

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35Idb_lCU4o

I got a lot more out of a presentation from the lead scientist from Oxford.  Among the take-aways:

 - luciferin, luciferin, luciferin (why they wanted it in there wasn't covered.  Presumably the audience already knew.)

 - The human body has mechanisms to detect cells who start pumping out unusual shit like virus parts and won't quit.  This causes problems for the technique.  Solution?  Easy.  Use MERS(!) fragments and other techniques to make the body not do this.  Can you say 'cancer epidemic dead ahead' anyone?

 - A logical question was asked by the audience:  'How long does the infected cell keep pumping out virus parts?'  Answer:  'We have no idea'.

Dunno if it is still on Jutube or not, but it's almost completely impossible to find anything it the censorship ridden waste dump any more.  Got it in my long-term archives, but that doesn't do much good here.

Again, you forgot to quote a few words of the isolation process actually being done. Anybody can link to all kinds of medical sites. Too bad you can't find the Covid isolation report. If you could, you wouldn't be afraid to quote it.

However, this is a forum, not a medical examining board. So you really don't need any excuse.

I've linked you to 40,000 independent isolations and sequencing of its complete genome twice now. If you are too dense to click on a link, then there isn't much I can do.

Here you are for the third time: https://www.viprbrc.org/brc/vipr_genome_search.spg?method=SubmitForm&decorator=corona&searchId=44742&runFrom=persistent