Proof of Development is a thing where the lead devs submit personal ID so that it is verified that they are the developer of the coin. like a drivers lisence or something since you can use anything as a screen name on here and have no way of proving two accounts belong to the same person.
i dont think there is a practical side to it. its mostly there for people to have someone to yell at if the coin price drops (in my opinion) but it can never be used to take any action against the person (nor should it be used to be) so i think its kinda pointless.
Thanks for your reply.
I think I understand now, so it's kind of a test to see if the programmer believes so in his plan to "put his face," and I mean to risk, his personal and professional reputation.
I mistakenly thought that instead was something more "technical" and difficult, a kind of portfolio verifiable with previous collaborations in other projects or personal projects lead to success, something that in fact would guarantee investors that the programmer is a person capable technically, and normally actually realizes what he starts, and it does so in the time periods specified.
In two words that he is both skilled and reliable.
But perhaps this is even more difficult to prove than anything else, due to the difficulty of achieving it evenly, and also because past successes can not guarantee the repetition on the future.
About your caution about disclosure of personal data basically agree with you.
So I'm pretty curious about what you intend to do about the Clear Send, or how you choose to call it.
