Topic: Energy Crisis 2.0 in the New World Order era - page 5. (Read 2608 times)

Meanwhile, in the real world, savages with cobblestones attacked Ukraine with some missiles. The glorious AFU, the only army in the world with 0 losses after 2 years of war, equipped with the most advanced air defence systems like Patriot, NASAMS (is being used to protect the White House), IRIS-T etc. were only able to intercept 18 missiles out of 59!

Source: https://www.facebook.com/CinCAFU/  

Yes, you're right, there's a fair chance the US will go bankrupt at some point. But then again, why do you think the countries adopting new tech won't be the same countries, which are exporting fossil fuels now? Reminds me of EV market where Tesla were the pioneers but eventually the market will be divided between the big guys like Mercedes, Porsche, the Japs, the French etc. So, everyone who was good at building conventional cars will eventually be good at EV and nobody will remember what Tesla was in 10-20 years. We can also compare it to the mobile phone industry, where Nokia or Blackberry were big, but where are they now?  

You can call the terrorist organization know as Israel "civilized" all you like and the dismantlement of the organization as "terrorism", but it won't change a thing. In 10 years from now, nobody would even remember these terrorists and their radical ideology known as Zionism will have to go back into hiding like the past 2000+ years since the world has seen its true face and has been waking up.
Besides, you as a Zionist should know this better than anybody else since it is prophesized in your תָּנָ״ךְ‎ specifically which is commonly known as the 8th decade curse.

Blockchain technology has not been about "profit making" ever. It has always been to address the centralized problem that exists in the monetary system. Maybe read the Bitcoin whitepaper some time to understand what Bitcoin was invented for!
As I said it is off-topic here because Bitcoin and blockchain technology is addressing an existing problem and are already providing a solution for it.

1. By itself, it is an investment for the future. But. Let me give you a simple example - Jeff Bezos. In the 90s of the last century, he, for example, persuaded his relatives to invest in his BOOK SHOP, if I'm not mistaken, about 10,000 dollars. Now their share is about $1 billion and the "conversion" has been 20+ years.

In addition, fusion is the most promising technology today in terms of obtaining unlimited, cheap, safe energy. And yes, it won't be tomorrow.

Regarding NATO and other things - this is nonsense, sorry If backward savages have a million cobblestones, it doesn't mean that the developed west will lose to them because they don't have 2 million cobblestones ) Just compare the power of the developed world's economy and the pariah countries that are trying to destabilize the world ? ! Yes, I realize that it is cheaper and easier to shit on the world than to create something, to build a legal state, to adhere to laws.  But this does not mean that the developed world will give up and allow terrorists and scum of the world to destroy civilization!

2. About blockchain - very much on topic !  Now the real use of this technology of a fraction of a percent in the world economy. although blockchain technology is very many years old - the practical realization was in 2008, and before that many years it was developed. Total - about 20 years. And so far, apart from speculative profit, blockchain does not generate any other profit ! Cold fusion technology - also has a key role in the future world, where fossil resources that provide energy are running out and their extraction is becoming more and more expensive. Moreover, this resource is becoming an element for manipulation, blackmail, and economic terrorism. And the launch of thermonuclear industrial power generation will also bankrupt countries that try to terrorize the world at the cost of energy resources. 

That sounds like a very risky investment because best case scenario is that your investment would lie there idle and without any profit, there may even be losses because it takes years for them to come up with an actual working solution that can then be mass deployed at a large scale and then become profitable. The first states would take decades, that's decades without seeing any profit.

Not to mention that with worsening global situation when all resources are going to the weapons manufacturers as NATO members have depleted most of their storages, there is not much room left for R&D into fixing energy problems! That further extends the end date of such technological breakthroughs.

That's an irrelevant example because the problems the blockchain technology is fixing aren't going anywhere but the energy crisis we are discussing in this topic will end LONG before we see a working solution for a reliable alternative energy source.

I'd say all the energy crisis cases I've discussed so far in different topics will end by the end of 2024 if what they say about US getting ready for a "strategic defeat" is correct.

The answer is very simple - this technology, which 10-20 years ago seemed fantastic, and there was no technology on the horizon to realize it. Today, these are already WORKING experimental reactors. Taking into account the exponential growth of technologies, we can assume the appearance of industrial plants even earlier than the specified period. And in 30 years, an interesting time will come - a significant reduction in oil production due to the depletion of sources of these energy carriers. And those who are now developing this technology, who are investing in it, and developing alternative energy will be on the energy Olympus. For example, I would gladly invest in such companies today, and I recommend it to those who now have such an opportunity....

We are discussing blockchain technology, which has not yet replaced the fiat financial system, and the prospects of such a scenario are also somewhere "beyond the horizon"

Why are we even discussing a very experimental solution that experts claim won't work at least for another 30 to 40 years? The world is moving towards that for sure but in such a long time a lot of things would change. Just look at the past 30 to 40 years! The world has changed significantly. I'd say it is perfectly possible to see another world order change in that period!

Yes, it doesn’t matter what the technology is called, the main thing is that humanity can get cheap, accessible, safe energy in unlimited quantities. And yes, I’m sure there will be several options - cold nuclear fusion, hydrogen “reactors”, and renewable energy sources - sun, wind, tidal, ... The world must move away from fossils, limited resources, which have recently been used for market manipulation and political issues.

I remember sci-fi movies that used what looked like an artificial sun which is the source of spacecraft power.
It's name "passanger", I don't know why they didn't choose nuclear power plants as their energy source.
whatever it is called thermonuclear fusion / hydrogen fusion / artificial sun basically the same, i think the potential is huge

Oil refining products are the main components that pollute the environment and create a greenhouse effect, and this causes glaciers to melt, the overall temperature to rise and the climate on the planet to change very quickly. I see that many are still discussing the advisability of moving away from the traditional use of oil as fuel for internal combustion engines. When entire countries begin to go under water, the volume of land on the planet will decrease, and in some areas of the remaining land the temperature will rise to critical levels for human habitation. Perhaps only after that they will think about this global problem. But perhaps it will be too late. After all, we are not the first civilization on this planet. They say that it was technical progress that destroyed the previous ones.

As practice shows, uranium cannot be called an ideal resource. From its limited deposits and the difficulty of processing, to the high risks of its use.
Thermonuclear fusion is a more promising option. Cheaper, safer, more effective. Among the disadvantages - at the moment there are no industrial solutions, there are only experimental installations. But in recent years, really good results have been achieved, and there is a high probability that within some time the world will be able to obtain a cheap, safe and virtually unlimited source of energy.

And in my opinion, your prediction above is very likely to happen because it is very likely that the stock of raw materials will be very reduced in the future and even if it continues to be used, this will be contrary to the spirit of fighting global warming and energy policies that encourage reducing dependence on energy. fossil fuels. The need for the chemical industry is still high and this need will also remain, especially in sectors such as pharmaceuticals, agriculture and manufacturing. Now it seems that the future will require very large and relatively clean resources without producing large amounts of greenhouse gas emissions. What if in the end it was uranium that was chosen for use.

No, that's not true. Artificial suns(fusion) are safer than nuclear reactors(fission). the problem is how to heat hydrogen atoms above 100 million degrees celsius over a long time.
There is no radioactive waste so it will be the cleanest energy source available to use.
You should read more about that

You don't really seem to understand what controlled fusion is..... Let me explain - this technology is not analogous to a controlled nuclear reaction when atoms split with the release of huge amounts of energy and radioactive by-products (nuclear power is almost the same as a nuclear explosion, but very slow). Thermonuclear fusion is a reverse process where atoms fuse together to form a new chemical element. At the same time, the element is not dangerous to the environment. I recommend you to study the subject, so as not to make such statements, extremely far from reality

Until now, creating an artificial sun will not be the main solution for energy, which is running low. When an artificial sun is created, it will be like a nuclear bomb that can destroy humanity. Do you know the element called "Xenon"? Xenon can be found only on Mars in very large quantities, whereas in our world, Xenon will only be created when a nuclear explosion occurs. Imagine if this artificial sun would explode and destroy life on earth. Sometimes humans are too aggressive to not think about the very dangerous impacts that are very threatening human life on earth.

"Transitional technologies" between today's energy production schemes can be considered alternative, renewable energy sources - solar, wind, thermal, tidal, .... Moreover, they may be acceptable for countries that simply do not have the funds to purchase a thermonuclear reactor or purchase imported electricity. And yes - the industrial operation of thermonuclear stations is not yet a year or even 5. But .. progress is being made, perhaps in the coming years, due to experimental installations, AI, new types of computing systems, we will get an acceleration in the implementation of industrial installations, and this will take not 30-50 years, but a shorter period

Scientists around the world are working to develop "artificial suns" - devices that generate energy by heating hydrogen atoms to temperatures above 100 million degrees Celsius and holding them long enough for them to fuse to form heavier atoms. A similar process occurs inside our sun, combining hydrogen atoms and releasing energy, light and heat.

China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC) said it has reached a major milestone in its quest to create an artificial sun powered by nuclear fusion, generating a plasma current of more than 1 million amps for the first time.

However, the challenge is to control this process so that the reactor does not explode when replicating the process on Earth. China is also cooperating with the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor, the world's largest fusion reactor, which is being built in France jointly by the European Union, India, Japan, South Korea, Russia and the United States.

I remember that the predictions of the famous Bulgarian soothsayer Vanga said that we would be able to launch several of these “artificial suns” in low orbit and they would evenly illuminate our planet around the clock, since, like the sun, this reaction releases light and heat. These will be balls with a diameter of approximately six meters. But after some time, two of them will collide in the sky. However, all the same, this will be the greatest progress in the field of providing people with clean and inexhaustible energy.

Just trust the motive. It's a politic every nation has different view about what is going on.
Even Nato won't back down when their country need more gas, oil and soon

I think they know about that but there is some issue that we don't know especially economy cost to build renewable energy and everything need time to change.
I think we still has more than 30 years to survive energy crisis

Yes, indeed, the use of thermonuclear fusion in the energy sector may become a turning point in assessing the safety of nuclear energy. Recently, many countries have begun to abandon nuclear power plants precisely because of problems with their safety during periods of increased seismological activity and other climatic anomalies, as well as an increase in the frequency of man-made disasters, including at nuclear power plants.

Along with improving technologies for using renewable energy sources, humanity can solve the problem of energy shortages and finally get rid of the use of fossil fuels, which pollute our planet and lead to drastic negative climate change.

The changing world order reflects a deeper reality – the constant evolution of nations, their economies, political structures, and social fabrics. As technology leaps forward, economies boom and bust, and populations shift like desert sands, so too does the balance of power on the global stage. Witnessing the rise of new powerhouses, like China and India, challenging the established hegemony of the West, is not a sign of weakness, but a testament to the dynamism and adaptability of the international system.

I think that the change of world order is a positive process. Because, a multipolar world encourages innovation and creativity. When no single power holds dominance, diverse perspectives and solutions are brought to the forefront, leading to breakthroughs in fields such as technology, science, and governance. This cross-pollination of ideas fosters a more vibrant and dynamic global environment. And bitcoin does the same thing for the monetary system.

All news feeds are abuzz with the news: "On December 1, the world's largest experimental fusion reactor was launched in Japan. At this point, scientists believe that despite the early stage of development of fusion energy technology, it could very well be a future source of unlimited energy for Earth's inhabitants.

According to ScienceAlert, fusion differs from nuclear fission, which is used in today's nuclear power plants, in that it involves fusing the nuclei of two atoms together rather than splitting the nucleus of a single atom. This process, known as thermonuclear fusion, occurs in the cores of all ordinary stars and ensures their existence. Unlike nuclear fission, fusion poses no risk of catastrophic nuclear power plant failures and generates far less radioactive waste."

Yes, experimental, but - working. It will be used to test technologies for commercial operation. Yes - industrial reactors will not appear tomorrow, but in the perspective of 10-15 years, it is already likely.  So we are highly likely to be in the era of low-cost and mass energy, which will replace most of the needs previously covered by fossil hydrocarbons