I think many users completely missed the point, most of them discuss hidden KYC and disagree to submit KYC because it will ruin their privacy. Well, the @OP friend doesn't matter with the KYC and he already submit it, the question is the casino didn't accept his KYC, you can't expect this matter because it's not written anywhere. There's no mention the casino can reject the KYC due to poor resolution and they're no mention of how long the KYC process will take.
Hey mate I think you are right a lot of comments have been from a wrong perception of ops' point of view and questions, this is the reason why we are having this misunderstanding and from the look of things only those who actually read comments can discuss the question on the topic but then hey this is gambling board, sometimes anything goes on.
Ops have already messed up because he trust the casino blindly since he said he got attracted to the casino because of the bonuses, so I am sure he registered without reading the casino terms and conditions, this has been the machallengenges we have being facing in the cryptocurrency online gambling discussion because some player just clicks on accept without reading the terms and conditions of the site and after ward come off with a lot of accusations I am not saying that is what is happening in this thread but we have hard a lot of misleading information lately that have made us to conclude that any topic that does not include sufficient information and evidence should not be taken seriously.
So that has been our standard practice for quite a while now, and from the ops explanation, you can easily notice that he failed to follow the terms and conditions of the casinos but was attracted to the bonuses.