Topic: Evolution is a hoax - page 134. (Read 108046 times)
LOL! Dogs are proof of cause and effect. Didn't you ever watch anybody train a dog? The genetic programming in a wild dog is the proof that the standard understanding of evolution doesn't apply to dogs... or anything else, for that matter.
Dogs are also proof of evolution. Within our recorded history, man has created hundreds of different kinds of animals from the one dog your god brought on the big boat.
You are trying to argue against a theroy you don't really understand.
Dogs are proof of evolution and how quickly it can change things. 
Pull your head out of the sand and go to a dog park someday. All these breeds were crafted by humans to enhance desired traits within our recorded history.
Pull your head out of the sand and go to a dog park someday. All these breeds were crafted by humans to enhance desired traits within our recorded history.
Dogs are proof of change, not evolution in the sense of evolution theory. Dive deeper into the sand.
No, you will not pull me down into the sand with you.
Dogs are proof of evolution. Go to a dog park and take a look at the wonders!
LOL! Dogs are proof of cause and effect. Didn't you ever watch anybody train a dog? The genetic programming in a wild dog is the proof that the standard understanding of evolution doesn't apply to dogs... or anything else, for that matter.
Its not a hoax! Evolution is just a fancy word for some fine ass, flawless and rule bound programming written by someone. For real, the way everything in this world works, including the biology of all organisms, it just seems so.... programmed. Coded. A little too perfectly.
However, science regarding cause and effect is not incorrect. Everything is programmed. Perhaps we will find it is not someday. But so far science has found nothing that is not C&E derived and affected. Point it out if you know of it.
This means that even evolution theory has been programmed to have happened. The scientists and others who have made and upheld evolution theory have been programmed to do so by C&E. This in itself shows that the so-called random mutations spoken about in evolution theory, are not random at all. Scientists were simply programmed by C&E, as was their theory of evolution.
Why would "some great programmer of nature" program scientists to think up a theory that says that there was pure random not affected by C&E, especially in the face of this programming, itself, proving evolution theory to be false? Why? To show the evolution scientists (and all of us) that even the things that they (we) are saying are programmed, so that they (we) can see that anything that seems to apply to evolution is programmed, as well, and not random mutations at all.
You can't prove everything is programmed, you can't even prove that everything has a cause (radioactive decay doesn't)
Quite the contrary. Everybody can prove it to themselves. All they have to do is realize that complexity that cause and effect provide.
Its not a hoax! Evolution is just a fancy word for some fine ass, flawless and rule bound programming written by someone. For real, the way everything in this world works, including the biology of all organisms, it just seems so.... programmed. Coded. A little too perfectly.
However, science regarding cause and effect is not incorrect. Everything is programmed. Perhaps we will find it is not someday. But so far science has found nothing that is not C&E derived and affected. Point it out if you know of it.
This means that even evolution theory has been programmed to have happened. The scientists and others who have made and upheld evolution theory have been programmed to do so by C&E. This in itself shows that the so-called random mutations spoken about in evolution theory, are not random at all. Scientists were simply programmed by C&E, as was their theory of evolution.
Why would "some great programmer of nature" program scientists to think up a theory that says that there was pure random not affected by C&E, especially in the face of this programming, itself, proving evolution theory to be false? Why? To show the evolution scientists (and all of us) that even the things that they (we) are saying are programmed, so that they (we) can see that anything that seems to apply to evolution is programmed, as well, and not random mutations at all.
You can't prove everything is programmed, you can't even prove that everything has a cause (radioactive decay doesn't)
Dogs are proof of evolution and how quickly it can change things.
Pull your head out of the sand and go to a dog park someday. All these breeds were crafted by humans to enhance desired traits within our recorded history.
Pull your head out of the sand and go to a dog park someday. All these breeds were crafted by humans to enhance desired traits within our recorded history.
Dogs are proof of change, not evolution in the sense of evolution theory. Dive deeper into the sand.
No, you will not pull me down into the sand with you.
Dogs are proof of evolution. Go to a dog park and take a look at the wonders!
Its not a hoax! Evolution is just a fancy word for some fine ass, flawless and rule bound programming written by someone. For real, the way everything in this world works, including the biology of all organisms, it just seems so.... programmed. Coded. A little too perfectly.
However, science regarding cause and effect is not incorrect. Everything is programmed. Perhaps we will find it is not someday. But so far science has found nothing that is not C&E derived and affected. Point it out if you know of it.
This means that even evolution theory has been programmed to have happened. The scientists and others who have made and upheld evolution theory have been programmed to do so by C&E. This in itself shows that the so-called random mutations spoken about in evolution theory, are not random at all. Scientists were simply programmed by C&E, as was their theory of evolution.
Why would "some great programmer of nature" program scientists to think up a theory that says that there was pure random not affected by C&E, especially in the face of this programming, itself, proving evolution theory to be false? Why? To show the evolution scientists (and all of us) that even the things that they (we) are saying are programmed, so that they (we) can see that anything that seems to apply to evolution is programmed, as well, and not random mutations at all.
Dogs are proof of evolution and how quickly it can change things.
Pull your head out of the sand and go to a dog park someday. All these breeds were crafted by humans to enhance desired traits within our recorded history.
Pull your head out of the sand and go to a dog park someday. All these breeds were crafted by humans to enhance desired traits within our recorded history.
Dogs are proof of change, not evolution in the sense of evolution theory. Dive deeper into the sand.
Dogs are proof of evolution and how quickly it can change things.
Pull your head out of the sand and go to a dog park someday. All these breeds were crafted by humans to enhance desired traits within our recorded history.
Pull your head out of the sand and go to a dog park someday. All these breeds were crafted by humans to enhance desired traits within our recorded history.
Its not a hoax! Evolution is just a fancy word for some fine ass, flawless and rule bound programming written by someone. For real, the way everything in this world works, including the biology of all organisms, it just seems so.... programmed. Coded. A little too perfectly.
Let me give another insight on the cause and effect argument since that's his only argument, all the others have been dismissed already. ''everything has a cause'' is not a factual statement and it is not known to be factual. Badecker only likes things that are factual, right? He keeps saying evolution theory is a theory not a fact. ''Everything has a cause'' is not a fact either and you can't prove everything has a cause, in fact some physicists would argue that some things may not have a cause. There are also arguments that show something that has an infinite cause because the effect is the cause. Either way, we do not know whether everything has a cause or not so that's wrong.
Let me give a little insight on cause and effect vs. evolution.
C&E is found in millions or billions or trillions of operations that we know of. If there is an operation wherein we haven't found C&E, nothing else has been found in that operation, either. This means that it's C&E, or we don't know, but the gigantically overwhelming evidence is for C&E.
Evolution is exactly the opposite. Close to 100% of the operations attributed to evolution have never been factually/actually observed as part of the evolution process. There is all kinds of circumstantial evidence that is loudly proclaimed. But there is only a tiny amount of actually-been-seen evidence. This means that the few observed operations that have been attributed to evolution, are little islands of evolution, which makes them far more liable to be part of some operation other than evolution.
This all means that a little, teensy-eensy evolution idea, is bucking overwhelming humongous C&E that says that evolution is something entirely different than evolutionists suggest. To put this into perspective, the odds that evolution could exist would be like a goldfish swimming up Victoria Falls in Zambia. It would like having a standard lottery drawing of millions of entries, with all the participants full winners.
Close to 100% of evolution is simply a science fiction story. All of the 100% of C&E that has been observed is humongous. The little bit of evolution that seems to truly be evolution, still has C&E behind it, making it to be something entirely different than the evolution that evolutionists are proclaiming.
In addition, no other points against evolution have been dismissed. Volumes have been filled with real reasons why evolution is false. Let's get to the point, and dismiss evolution as the science fiction that it is. But since the science fiction known as evolution is being touted as fact by those who know otherwise, evolution is a big, fat hoax.
Let me give another insight on the cause and effect argument since that's his only argument, all the others have been dismissed already. ''everything has a cause'' is not a factual statement and it is not known to be factual. Badecker only likes things that are factual, right? He keeps saying evolution theory is a theory not a fact. ''Everything has a cause'' is not a fact either and you can't prove everything has a cause, in fact some physicists would argue that some things may not have a cause. There are also arguments that show something that has an infinite cause because the effect is the cause. Either way, we do not know whether everything has a cause or not so that's wrong.
I don't think it is a hoax. If your premise is that there still monkeys if there are still humans. Then why are there still single celled organisms? Why are still there fishes? Why is there still reptiles and there are birds? How you actually explain bones dating back millions of years? Even now, there species of tortoises that evolved to have longer necks to survive their environment. A specie is very much dependent on its environment
I wish Badecker would not come on here crying for help, and then leave when people start to help him. 
But I guess he was getting tired - you can tell this when he starts copying your arguments because he can no longer debate.
He will see reality eventually - the entire world is throwing off ignorance... he has to hear the rumors of sunshine even with his head buried deep in the sand. :/
But I guess he was getting tired - you can tell this when he starts copying your arguments because he can no longer debate.
He will see reality eventually - the entire world is throwing off ignorance... he has to hear the rumors of sunshine even with his head buried deep in the sand. :/
Well, I'm going to have to say it again but evolution does not violate any of the scientific laws badecker. You are saying that god programmed evolution, which still doesn't disprove evolution.
When you guys are upside down in the sand like you are, you can't see anything. It's all your imagination.
Can I ask how you can see where we are when your head is in the sand?
To observe reality, you need to pull it out. :/
Oh, you and your trolling propaganda. Do they pay you enough to sit there and blab without presenting any evidence? Are they afraid that when people find out that evolution is false, that their little world will come crashing down on them?
People cannot find out evolution is false, any more than they can uncook an egg.
You will understand this one day when you pull your head out of the sand.
Talk, talk, talk. I have shown you the proof that evolution is false, over and aver. All you can do is say evolution is true, with nothing to back it up. Makes you look more and more like a troll all the time.
All you've done is shown the world how retarded you are, over and over.
But you have proven that very thing about yourself.
Actually, as an independent third person, Badecker, it is YOU that look like the retard.
I see bluefirecorp_ trying to help you pull your head out of the sand, and you are inviting him to stick his head in. :/
When you guys are upside down in the sand like you are, you can't see anything. It's all your imagination.
Come on, if you can. Rebut the scientific fact of the existence of C&E, and how it proves that evolution doesn't exist. Show that you have more than just hot air down there under the sand.
Oh, you and your trolling propaganda. Do they pay you enough to sit there and blab without presenting any evidence? Are they afraid that when people find out that evolution is false, that their little world will come crashing down on them?
People cannot find out evolution is false, any more than they can uncook an egg.
You will understand this one day when you pull your head out of the sand.
Talk, talk, talk. I have shown you the proof that evolution is false, over and aver. All you can do is say evolution is true, with nothing to back it up. Makes you look more and more like a troll all the time.
All you've done is shown the world how retarded you are, over and over.
But you have proven that very thing about yourself.
Actually, as an independent third person, Badecker, it is YOU that look like the retard.
I see bluefirecorp_ trying to help you pull your head out of the sand, and you are inviting him to stick his head in. :/
Jump to: