Topic: Evolution is a hoax - page 55. (Read 108173 times)

"action" > "always" > "reaction." What causes the reaction? rofl smart ass, what causes the action?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_death_of_the_universe
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy_(order_and_disorder)

And this shows evolution is impossible how?

It's a huge topic where there hasn't been any hypothesis good enough to stop fighting about it
So, let's keep on trying. I for one, do not believe in evolution just because I haven't seen any trustworthy evidence to support any theory.

3368 posts are long enough to fight for the truths of the past that might not be very useful in the future.

A long time ago, in a galaxy billions of lightyears away, on a planet, around an obscure star...

Evolution there was much faster than it is here. It followed a totally different course than did ours. Those beings evolved much faster. Finally, one of the most highly developed creatures on that planet evolved all the way.

What is all-the-way? It evolved to a point that it could completely control the space/time continuum with its mind. Once it evolved to this stage, it realized that evolution was a problemsome occurrence that did no justice to species that were evolving. So, using its fully evolved mind, it set about to do something about this deplorable "state" of evolution events.

The first thing it did was to get rid of the great lengths of time.
Then it got rid of evolution altogether (although some of the dregs of the appearance of evolution still remain).
It even got rid of the big bang.
Then it created all life in place without evolution, and made the start to be 6,000 years ago.
The Bible shows the story of this happening.

Some people who know about all this, say. "But it all started with evolution." But they forget the part about evolution being gone altogether. No evolution.

Evolution is a hoax.

I mean, this story is at least as credible as the story of evolution... evolution, which we can find no scientifically provable facts of.

But if they're not fully evolved?

All you manage to do is show that you are deceptive. Google "universal entropy." You will find that entropy is not a diminishing of matter/energy, but that it simply has to do with the way matter/energy exists. At best, we don't understand what could possibly stop entropy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_death_of_the_universe
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy_(order_and_disorder)

Regarding Newton's 3rd Law, from the site you posted, "To every action there is always opposed an equal reaction: or the mutual actions of two bodies upon each other are always equal, and directed to contrary parts."

Did you catch the little word "always?" It works like this: "action" > "always" > "reaction." What causes the reaction? The action... always. C&E in everything. It doesn't say only in big things. It doesn't say only in small things. It says always.

Whoever or Whatever started C&E was the programmer of the universe. Programming cancels random by definition, and shows us what random really is. Random is really our inability to know or understand the whole process. But in our case, we barely know any of the process. How do we know that we barely know any of the process? We attempt to believe in evolution, even when we are shown that it can't exist in any way that we can come up with, and also when we can't find even one factual example of it having occurred.

Evolution is a hoax.

''Entropy doesn't contradict the Second Law of Thermodynamics.'' ?

The second law of thermodynamics states that the total entropy of an isolated system can never decrease over time. The Earth is not a thermally isolated system because it receives constant energy from the Sun. This is the energy fixed by plants using photosynthesis, which is then acquired by herbivores that eat the plants and carnivores that eat the herbivores. It is certainly true that without this constant addition of energy to the Earth’s system, life would be impossible, but fortunately for us, the radiation we receive is like the constant motivation for the youngster to keep his or her room tidy. The second law of thermodynamics simply cannot be used the way the anti-evolutionists try to use it.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12052-009-0195-3

You are wrong.

''cause and effect, which is upheld by Newton's 3rd Law, shows that everything is programmed.'' No it doesn't.
http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/newtlaws/Lesson-4/Newton-s-Third-Law
https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/forces-newtons-laws/newtons-laws-of-motion/a/what-is-newtons-third-law
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_laws_of_motion#Newton's_3rd_Law

Where does it say that everything is programmed?

Wrong again, as usual, I already showed you this dozens of times.

Entropy doesn't contradict the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The fact that energy and matter remain without being lost, doesn't have anything to do with the form in which they exist. Entropy is simply the breaking down of the complexity of the form. It's all still there. It simply is less complex. There is nothing in nature that shows the opposite.

In addition, cause and effect, which is upheld by Newton's 3rd Law, shows that everything is programmed. Programmed mutations that cause evolution are not the evolution of evolution theory. ETE mutations have to be random and un-programmed.

Now, I can understand your inability to explain what you say... because there isn't any explanation for what you say. And, it's the major reason for not having found even one factual piece of evolution theory evolution, although countless billions or trillions of pieces should be available to make life what it is in the world today. So, why keep on maintaining the evolution fable?

Evolution is a hoax.

''Entropy doesn't allow evolution over the long term to occur.'' Badecker has alzheimer's or an IQ below 70, maybe both.

The theory of evolution does not contradict any known laws of physics. I have showed you this like 40 times before, of course your brain doesn't work normally. http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/astronomy-links/136-physics/general-physics/thermodynamics/816-does-evolution-contradict-the-second-law-of-thermodynamics-intermediate

I hear some guys who majored in biology don't believe in evolution either. They argue the evolution theory is all wet and provide some undeniable evidence, which makes me agree with you

Study entropy. The simplest way to describe entropy is the breaking down of complexity into simplicity. Entropy doesn't allow evolution over the long term to occur. In fact, entropy suggests devolution.

The reason we don't have any factual example of evolution is not because of its nature. Rather, it's because there isn't any evolution. All the talk of evolution is simply talk. When you add the rest of science to the science of evolution, you can easily see that evolution is impossible.

You are being played. Evolution is a hoax.

Think you are looking for examples of proof that is simple not available.  That’s does not mean you can’t deduct from proof that are there. Example can we agree on that humans average high have increased in say the last 100-200 years? If you take that premises as acceptable, even true, how are you going to prove that, 100 million years from now?

The chances that you are going to dig up 10 specimens of each gender, for every single year, for every region of the planet, many 1000 specimens in all, to make a good case, that is very hard to argue against, is statistical zero. Chances are you only have a few specimens of mixed gender, and mix completeness, cover those couple of 100 years. From that you deduct or rather make a theory.

In case of evolution, we far from have all the answers and far from all the proof to 100% support all branches of those theories. Working on it, but to say there is no proof, is your unsupported theory.

Think of it this way. In evolution we have 1 specimen from 3000 b.c, 2 from 400 b.c, a couple from 200 a.d and one from 1920. From that we have an evolution theory. Complete, narrr far from it. Work in progress. We are learning every day.

Well as far as i have heard about the evolution is that "is where species change and adjust for them to have the capacity to survive". Advancement is a long procedure, it could take several years, hundreds of years, or even a large number of years. Likewise, the logical hypothesis of the advancement of man does not particularly said monkeys; it just specified that man originated from "chimp like" precursors. Notwithstanding that, to help my previously mentioned explanation, as per my exploration, the entire procedure of the development of man took about finished a time of roughly a large number of years.

I’m gonna need a Tim foil hat after reading some of these comments.

Religion is truly a mental illness. Look what it did to you, unable to accept anything other than a book written 6k years ago. Even your fellow delusional friends accept evolution.

So far, every proof of evolution you have shown, is simply proof of adaptation and/or like-begets-like. It is proof of how people try to delude themselves and each other with lies, as well.

The neat thing is, when scientists get right down to showing proof for evolution, they admit that there isn't any, and that even the IDEA of evolution doesn't have much of any real support for itself - https://www.lewrockwell.com/2018/07/fred-reed/signature-in-the-cell-and-intelligent-design/.

Well I mean, your argument is basically saying to anything that's proof of evolution, that is not. Not much of an argument really.

That's a nice science fiction article, there. But it doesn't have even one proof that evolution exists in it.

Evolution is a hoax.

Scientifically speaking I already gave you scientific examples of evolution confirmed by scientists. https://www.wired.com/2008/12/evolutionexampl/

All of this accepted by virtually all scientists... Just saying...

That's a truly nice observation, there, but it doesn't have even a single proof that evolution exists in it.

There are millions or billions or trillions of readily observable instances of adaptation and like-begets-like. The odds for evolution happening even once are so small, that evolution is an impossibility, scientifically speaking.

Evolution is a hoax.