''the earth system shows signs of entropy all over the place''
What are you on about, are you trolling me or?''The earth is NOT a closed system without entropy.'' ?? The earth is not a closed system, indeed, that's why evolution does not contradict the 2nd law of thermodynamics which clearly you don't understand at all, or just trolling. The 2nd law states ''In any closed system, the entropy of the system will either remain constant or increase.'' Earth is not a closed system, it's an isolated system. We gain radiated heat energy from the sun. This seems fairly easy to understand but religion has destroyed your brain.
Again, no scientific law says anything about things being programmed or that true randomness doesn't exist, you are just a nutjob. Show me the scientific law that says that.
So, now you are trying to suggest that a pendulum won't ever stop swing on earth. Pendulum retardation. Simple entropy at its finest!
The obviousness of the programming is something that any simple scientist understands. Just because the term programming wasn't in common scientific use back when simple cause and effect was scientifically explained, doesn't make C&E to not be programming.
C&E programming along with entropy easily show the impossibility of evolution, at least as evolution is expressed by evolution theory.
Evolution is a hoax, and you are trying to expand the evolution hoax.
Show me the scientific paper/article that says everything is programmed.
Life causes entropy of the earth to decrease. This is offset by increased entropy of the sun, which is the primary source of energy for the earth. Overall, the entropy of the universe increases.
"Evolution violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics."
This shows more a misconception about thermodynamics than about evolution. The second law of thermodynamics says, "No process is possible in which the sole result is the transfer of energy from a cooler to a hotter body." [Atkins, 1984, The Second Law, pg. 25] Now you may be scratching your head wondering what this has to do with evolution. The confusion arises when the 2nd law is phrased in another equivalent way, "The entropy of a closed system cannot decrease." Entropy is an indication of unusable energy and often (but not always!) corresponds to intuitive notions of disorder or randomness. Creationists thus misinterpret the 2nd law to say that things invariably progress from order to disorder.
However, they neglect the fact that life is not a closed system. The sun provides more than enough energy to drive things. If a mature tomato plant can have more usable energy than the seed it grew from, why should anyone expect that the next generation of tomatoes can't have more usable energy still? Creationists sometimes try to get around this by claiming that the information carried by living things lets them create order. However, not only is life irrelevant to the 2nd law, but order from disorder is common in nonliving systems, too. Snowflakes, sand dunes, tornadoes, stalactites, graded river beds, and lightning are just a few examples of order coming from disorder in nature; none require an intelligent program to achieve that order. In any nontrivial system with lots of energy flowing through it, you are almost certain to find order arising somewhere in the system. If order from disorder is supposed to violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics, why is it ubiquitous in nature?
The thermodynamics argument against evolution displays a misconception about evolution as well as about thermodynamics, since a clear understanding of how evolution works should reveal major flaws in the argument. Evolution says that organisms reproduce with only small changes between generations (after their own kind, so to speak). For example, animals might have appendages which are longer or shorter, thicker or flatter, lighter or darker than their parents. Occasionally, a change might be on the order of having four or six fingers instead of five. Once the differences appear, the theory of evolution calls for differential reproductive success. For example, maybe the animals with longer appendages survive to have more offspring than short-appendaged ones. All of these processes can be observed today. They obviously don't violate any physical laws''
http://physics.gmu.edu/~roerter/EvolutionEntropy.htm
