Topic: Evolution is a hoax - page 7. (Read 108046 times)

But you see? I am in a position to post on the subject. How can you tell? Because you even respond to my posts that I post on the subject. Therefore I must have examined the evidence.

However, you can't seem to state the evidence yourself, in your own words. And you never respond to the point that there is proof.

Evolution is a hoax.

If you did not examine the evidence, then you are in no position to speak on the subject.

It was fast, because I didn't have to examine them to know that there isn't any ETE.

The fact that horses have baby horses rather than baby cows or baby ducks, etc., shows like-begets-like.

Evolution is a hoax. No proof for it after a couple hundred years of looking with modern science. And the evidence, if it fits at all, it fits just barely, in science fiction style.

That was fast. Did you examine them?

Which ones fit 'like-begets-like'? Can you list them?  LOL.

The evidence is there, you are just not willing to see it, instead, you reject it all because it invalidates your mythology.

All these fossils fit simple change, like-begets-like, and adaptation far better than they fit ETE. There is no proof that ETE has anything to do with any fossils. In fact, it is just the opposite. There are many fossils that evolutionists acknowledge as having no source for their existence.

Evolution is a hoax.

Go visit the natural history museum and see the human lineage fossils for yourself.

http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence

https://naturalhistory.si.edu/exhibits/david-h-koch-hall-human-origins

10th St. & Constitution Ave. NW  Washington, D.C. 20560  Free admission. Open every day except  Dec. 25 from 10 AM to 5:30 PM

https://www.facebook.com/smithsonian.humanorigins/

 

All right. We have a disagreement. But nobody has shown anything that fits the definition of proof, regarding what they have found or shown about ETE (evolution theory). If they say they have proof at all, the best they do is to keep on screaming that they have proof. They never provide any proof.

Since you don't have an understanding of the things that they call evidence or proof for ETE, you don't really know what ETE proof entails, and you don't even know what they are talking about.

Evolution is still a hoax.

-No you have not.
-Yes you do, aamof, that’s all you post, nonsense...which is pretty old news actually.
-No you have not.
-No he doesn’t.
-No it’s not. But keep repeating it ad infinitum, like the ignorant fool that you are...
      whatever floats your boat....

Blonde + ginger, or white skin + black skin... that's just breeding within a single species. Like some gazelles are fast and some slow, just variation within a population.

Natural selection is where certain animals or people within that population have a better chance to survive and breed. Fast gazelles run away, slow get eaten. In the next generation the gazelles are faster on average.

You don't need cross-breeding between species to make it happen.

alot of people still think that evolution is god. or just time if same species mutation without cross-breeding..

so lets change the word cross-breeding and differing species, to b the word 'race'

imagine a devolved greyback gorilla and an devolved orangatang is the same as a middle aged american guy with blonde hair and a young irish lass with ginger hair..  they both become attracted to each other

the offspring might have blonde hair, might have very rich red hair, or might be a strawberry blonde
suddenly where strawberry blondes were not a thing. becomes a thing..
not due to climate/environmental changes. not due to survival of the fittest. not due to only blondes banging other only blondes and a mutant head pops out.. but also by cross breeding between differing variants of species that are compatible enough to have a viable pregnancy

again millions of years ago the species divide was less spread out and cross breeding caused evolutions to occur much faster due to cross breeding rather than environment adaptations over thousands of years

take skin colour. in thousands of years there was just whites and blacks. but since the end of segregation in the last century and transport allowed the two to meet up and fall inlove. we have now seen a population change from just dark vs pale to being tanned and exotic skin colours

a modern example of evolution can be that all 'descended humans' become a creamy coffee skin tone instead of the black/pale white divide of history

I understand. It's quite a fine distinction, but I'll have a go. 'Random' mutations occur and combine with natural selection to result in evolution. Sure, these are not totally random. There is (extremely complex) cause and effect that result in genes mutating in the way that they do. Perhaps it would also be possible to predict the universe as it is now with everything in it, starting with just the big bang, and armed with only physics and time.
Yes, 'random' mutations are all caused by something, some repair error in genetic code. And it's not random that some mutations end up being beneficial and some detrimental, it's just how it fits the environment.

This isn't evidence of some omnipotent creator though, it's just physics plus time. Push a ball and it will fall off the table. Cause and effect. We can prove why it happened. Doesn't mean that God did it.

Since you don't understand what they are talking about in evolution websites, and can't explain the proof in your own words, the start is long gone. The finish is...

Evolution is a hoax.

That is what I thought.  You would not know where to start.

Now you can't even read?! I have been explaining what evolution is for a long time, now. All you have to do is read it.

Evolution is a hoax. Hoaxes don't work. After a while people see through them.

What is it?  Please explain it to me in your own words.  What is Evolution?  How does it work?

I learned what it is. That's why I don't post nonsense. I learned. But you keep on posting nonsense.

Evolution is a hoax.

No aliens required, LOL.  Just parents with Rh+ (and d antigens).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rh_blood_group_system

How controversial is the idea that evolution is real, but mankind did not evolve naturally on this planet?  

I am curious how the science community explains away things like Rh- blood types.  Are some of us mutants or aliens? 

Just learn what it is before you post nonsense.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

Evolution Theory Evolution (ETE) is not simple change, adaptation, or like-begets-like. The two basic areas where these things differ are in the understanding of random, and in cause and effect (C&E).

C&E, which exists all over the place, and throughout everything that we understand, suggests design rather than some form of pure random. ETE tricks people into thinking that random and pure random are the same. But they aren't. Pure random has to do with complete spontaneity. Simple random has to do with our ignorance and inability to track detailed C&E.

ETE is full of simple random. But that we know, there isn't any pure random anywhere. This means that ETE is full of our ignorance and inability to track detailed C&E. So, if we can't track it, how do we even know that it exists? Saying that ETE IS simple change, adaptation, and like-begets-like is just a guess.

Simple random - not knowing - has to do with simple change, adaptation, or like-begets-like, because these things all operate through C&E with no proof for ETE. Pure random doesn't exist at all that we have proven. Even computers that operate on what is called pure random, still have causes for their random effects. ETE has no proof.

Evolution is a hoax.