Topic: Evolution is a hoax - page 2. (Read 108057 times)

On the other hand. Magic man in the sky saying hocus pocus and pops everything into existence is a much better explanation....

Continuing to show videos and stories about your religion is admirable of you, even when your religion is the false religion of evolution. People do this with their false religions all the time.

Regarding evolution, if you look at the aspects of reality regarding the things in your videos, you will see that things in nature don't work like the videos say. You will also see that evolution things are only interpretations of evidence that are desired to exist the way the interpreters suggest. Check the opposing science to see that this is true.

Evolution is a hoax.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOfRN0KihOU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18YwBwIK_no

Do you remember that book, "You Are What You Eat?" This works mentally as well as physically. Continue to believe you are going to die young, and you probably will.

Devolution is the reality. Evolution is a hoax.

I find the idea of a human living for 1,000 years quite laughable. Prove it.

For the first 2,500 years after creation, people lived for almost 1,000 years. Certainly not all of them did. Certainly there were murders. Certainly some died at only 500 or 600 years.

After the Great Flood of Noah's day, people still lived for hundreds of years... some an easy 400 or 500. Long life like this gradually went down until it is what it is today. Some of the Neanderthal skeletons are simply people from a short time after the Great Flood, people who lived 400 or 500 years.

Search on "Jack Cuozzo Neanderthal," or go to http://www.jackcuozzo.com/.

Because evolution is just a theory that has never been proven.

>He thinks neanderthals are 400 years old.

Do yourself a favor and don't have any kids.

You haven heard that people can mentally change their DNA? Neanderthal skeletons are simply skeletons of very old people - like 400 or 500 years old - who had a different concept of life, making their DNA slightly different thereby.

IIRC scientists recently decided that dogs aren't the direct ancestors of wolves, none-the-less they're still the same species and can breed effectively. As for donkeys they're definitely not breed from horses and are in fact a separate spices. Selective breeding can create variations of a species but you're never going to breed a dog into a cat, a rat or a bat.

You accuse us of not having facts yet what you're saying isn't even in line with what modern science pretends to know; you proclaim that creationists are "scientifically illiterate" yet your arguments betray your own illiteracy.

It has never been shown that one spices can become another simply by the process of environmental selection and adaptation. It's claimed that this occurs over long periods of time but there's no hard evidence to back it up and, in fact there's no hard evidence earth is older than 10,000 years.

The fact is you're being sold a story of creation that while seeming plausible on the surface is just not true. It's not that scientists are wrong, they're paid to lie and push whatever so-called facts their handlers give them. There's an agenda and an official narrative with malicious actors at play here.

The various species on earth including humans were engineered.

Except that you don't know that mutations and evolution have anything to do with each other. I don't understand why this is hard for scientifically illiterate evolutionists to understand. Oops! I do know why. They are scientifically illiterate.

Cause-and-effect shows us that the reason there are mutations is because innumerable molecules and energy waves bump into each other in precisely the exact way dictated by physics. This makes mutations to be programming, albeit very complex programming.

Just look at corn before and after we started farming. We found that by adding a fish along with each kernel of corn, that the corn would grow better. Then we found that adding fertilizer worked in a similar way. It's all chemical reactions that flow according to the laws of physics in chemistry. There isn't any evolution theory evolution (ETE) involved at all.

Go ahead and turn a wolf into a dog or a horse into a donkey. Can we do this? It isn't evolution. Evolution has to do with nature doing it. You never saw nature turning a bunch of metal and sand and other elements into a car, did you? The idea that nature uses anything other than simple change, like-begets-like, and adaptation to cause differences in plants and animals, has never been observed. Even the so-called evidences of ETE fit simple change, like-begets-like, and adaptation better than they fit ETE. Your examples happen without ETE.

ETE says that there as to be randomness. As I indicated above, there can be only two forms of random:
1. Human ignorance about a process;
2. Pure spontaneity.
Pure spontaneity has never been proven anywhere. There really isn't any evidence for it. So, the randomness in ETE is really human ignorance. Why? Because we don't know the process.

Did you catch that? HUMAN IGNORANCE is the randomness in ETE. This means that humans don't know that there is any ETE at all. Again,why? Because of their ignorance.

Now, all this writing I am doing is just to show you that there isn't any ETE. If you want proof that there isn't any ETE, delve into this https://globalwarming-arclein.blogspot.com/2019/11/9-scientific-facts-prove-theory-of.html.

>Doesn't have any facts
>Instantly resorts to ad hominems

You do realize that changes happen slowly over thousands of years. Also, how did humans turn wolves into dogs and how did humans turn horses into donkeys if evolution doesn't work?

Also have you heard of Neanderthals?

^^^ Seriously, have you considered that you're gullible, you know being spoon fed plausible sounding stories?

Once species has never been shown to give birth to another. Adaptation to the environment certainly doesn't prove this nor are there any intermediate fossils to back up this claim.

Your entire paradigm of big bang to cheeky monkey is a farce and you're being played the fool.

We actually do know the answer, and it's evolution.

When bacteria multiply, some of them get mutations. Most of them make the bacteria die (just like how genetic diseases and cancer, also caused by mutations, are bad for people), but considering that there are trillions of bacteria and that they reproduce literally every day, some of them are bound to get mutations that help them against antibiotics. When you use antibiotics, the normal bacteria all die, while some of the bacteria with "helpful" mutations survive. What's left is all the resistant bacteria, which quickly reproduce (that's why you have to take antibiotics even after you feel better). After that, you end up with mostly resistant bacteria. That's basically how evolution works.

I don't understand why this is hard for scientifically illiterate evolution deniers to understand. Humans have been causing evolution for quite a while, just look at corn before and after we started farming. How did we turn wolves into dogs? How did we turn horses into donkeys? Horses and donkeys (along with wolves and dogs) are different species now, they can reproduce, but the offspring is infertile (as they have different numbers of chromosomes), meaning that they effectively can't pass their genes on if they mate. See, humans were able to make different species through evolution, so evolution is real.

If all you saw was the corner pocket of the pool table, you might ask how that ball got into the corner pocket. It's similar with all kinds of questions about biology and physics, and everything else.

Just because we don't know the cause and effect processes that cause bacteria to become resistant to diseases, certainly doesn't mean it's evolution. Why there are new strains of flu, has to do with adaptation and cause and effect, both of which are very complex operations.

Random has two basic meanings:
1. We don't know;
2. Pure spontaneity.
Evolution theory says that there has to be random. Which kind is it? The random of us not knowing, or something purely spontaneous in the universe? If it's us not knowing, then why say evolution has anything to do with it? Good guessing?

Everybody knows that there are tons of things that we don't know. But nobody has proof for even one spontaneous happening where something new just came about for no reason. In fact, pure spontaneity is something that doesn't even make sense in our universe.

Regarding your questions, let me add to them the question of all the forces that cause a leaf to sway in the breeze. We can't track even one molecule of air that hits the leaf. We may never be able to so track a molecule.

Your questions don't have answers because we aren't smart enough, or capable enough, yet. Evolution isn't an answer except to the ignorant. And the smart evolutionists know this.

Evolution is a hoax.




BONUS: Read more at the site.



Manuka honey found to eliminate deadly drug-resistant bacteria in cystic fibrosis (CF) infections

If evolution isn't true, how do bacteria develop resistance to antibiotics? Do new genes just magically appear?

Why do we have so many different types of flu? Why is there a new strain every year?

All by itself it might be evidence for lots of things. Mostly it is evidence that there was something like a camera to take the picture, and all the electronics that make the picture visible.

Just the picture alone doesn't provide evidence for any more than existence. The further we go into the background for the animal that is portrayed by the picture, the more we see like-begets-like. But one can twist everything around a bit to make it appear that there is evidence for evolution in it. So, it is desire to see what wants to see as evidence... not what really is evidence.

I'm interested in your opinion about the manatee flipper image I posted on the last page. Is that by itself not evidence that its ancestors once walked on land?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53134470

Godwin's Law: As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving vestigial toenails approaches 1.

But there isn't anyone on Earth who could understand how life evolved, since evolution is against science.

These are not proofs, these are claims made by someone who does not understand how life on Earth evolved.