Fortunately, it isn't the simple publication of documents that makes up what is proof. The things published also have to be correct. Nobody is required to prove that ETE doesn't exist. All one has to show us that so-called proof is not proof, and destroys itself as proof. And that is exactly what I have been doing.
Proof for ETE would have to include tracking the DNA of millions of generations of millions of creatures over hundreds of thousands of years. We haven't tracked even one creature like this. In fact, it's beyond our ability to so track.
Not really. But I understand why you demand it.
You don't need to disassemble and reverse engineer all cars that have ever existed to understand how a car works.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srC1au8ZiU4
Your car example doesn't fit. Why not? Because we clearly have cars. But we don't know that there is evolution. We don't know that what we are reverse engineering is evolution. But we clearly see that it is simple change, adaptation, and like-begets-like.
Take off your blinders. Don't say "we", just say "I don't know how evolution works and what the evidence for it is."
How do you think you will ever learn anything when you refuse to examine the evidence?
I took them off, and I found that you STILL don't have any proof for evolution. At least, you aren't even talking in that direction... probably because you wouldn't understand proof if it jumped up and bit you in the eye.
Evolution is a hoax.