Topic: Evolution is a hoax - page 76. (Read 108165 times)

God is the reason for evolution.

It would be easy to disprove. You should do it again if you have done it one time. Or at least ressurect one person or make at least one thing a new to show you have at least a little bit of your power left. You see? Faking religion is hard. Almost harder than faking science.

Yes. Lot's of other science fiction concepts can be difficult to understand.

You didn't disproved anything tho, you are just asking me to do things. I can't show directly anything because I need you to believe in me but trust me, I am actually god. I have done plenty of miracles, I stopped the nazis personally and I created science. Stop saying I'm not god because that is blasphemy and I do not like that, you could go to hell forever if you make me mad so be careful next time you post.

The more you invent stuff the easier it is to disprove. Now you have to show:

1. That you would not have anything against cutting your head off as it is just a flesh wound. Many Muslims would woulantary do that - just tell them you are a God. If I would see you speak to a group of Muslims that you are a creator of the universe. That would impress me.
2. You should know every detail about how people dress, eat, live, travel in every possible historical epoch and that should be accurate historicly. If you would write a book and that would be accurate you would be a very rich guy with this bestseller. Why do you waste your time on some cheap affiliation campaign?
3. You should know anything about Jesus that fail to see you do.
4. You must be quite famous speaking about you having enourmous powers like all prophets were. What prophet were you and why? You do not even know handful of them.
5. Still you have to know at least what miracles were there.
6. And if you claim not be Jesus so you know. His miracles does not count you would need to know other miracles. It so happens to be that I guess only 2 people in recorded history claimed to ressurected someone. Which one were you? You do not even know how you were named? Then you have problems with memory. If you have problems with memory you can't remember the begining.


And many many many ways to disprove your silliness the more you talk. You just make it easier. Stop it. You just make a fool out of yourself with each blasphemy you speak.

What?? Haven't you seen all the miracles? I personally resurrected jesus and I'm still currently performing all kinds of miracles. Now I can't go around here showing my powers directly because people would flip out, you just have to believe me, ok?

It would be easy to disprove. You should do it again if you have done it one time. Or at least ressurect one person or make at least one thing a new to show you have at least a little bit of your power left. You see? Faking religion is hard. Almost harder than faking science.

Yes. Lot's of other science fiction concepts can be difficult to understand.

''Because the universe existed before you.'' Prove it, I existed way before the universe traveling from body to body.

Evolution is a very simple concept to understand. It involves perfect common sense.

No. The Bible does not originated from the Torah - it is the Torah and the book of prophets, and the New Testament . It is Jewish Bible aka Tanah - the Old Testament is the Jewish holy book. It is our holy book. Because christians are the new Israel of the spirit.

Talmud - the book that judaism mostly uses is not a holy book - the Rabbi themselves admitt that.

It is the original Tanah the Word of God. Muslims have deeply edited version of the same thing. They rewrote what they had not like just to justify their tribality. From a Jewish and Christian perspective - editing the Word of God is something noone should do - it is forbidden.

Editing the word of God resulted in muslims inventing the evolution. It came to Europe via Templars and their orders. Templars then have restructured themselfs to masons. So it was masons that are behind that evolution thingy. So it should be no surprise that a mason write another mason a peer-review and screw other nonmasons. Does that surprise anyone?

Darwin was teologian. His father was a teologian. It was a fully grown religious concept of evolution when Darwin had signed his silly book. His book was supposedly written by someone more intelligent as C. Darwin was supposed to be dumbest of all the Darwins family.

Just for your personal information. I know it sounds deeply confusing from a pop-culture perspective.


They showed 1 out of many experiment involving meterorite that supposedly prove that. I am asking - why then all the rest gives from 5 to 8 aminoacids out of 20. It is deeply fraud like. It seems like this meteorite contained some dead bug in it - hence all aminoacids needed. But talking about the flying bug in the space is even dumber than evolution.

And I thought that a magical monkey fossils that noone had seen, but yet is believed to be true is dumb enough. Dead bug in the space beats it all.

They show the untested sample of their holy grail they supposedly found in 2008 - that is their only "prove". For it to be prove it should have to be retested. They fail to grasp the importance of retesting in science and yet call others willfuly ignorant. That is hipocritical.


Where are your repeatability of evolution? Where is your observability of evolution? Where is your falsifiability of evolution?

It is not science. It fails miserably at those things needed to be called science. It is a religion so... you know... it could as well be a religion of Satan for all I know.

Yeah. A person can have benefit of a doubt it seems. You agree that people can have that towards the evolution don't you?

It is extremely easy to prove you are wrong. Childishly easy to prove you have not created the universe. Because the universe existed before you.

Poof. Your theory have been smashed to pieces. You think it is hard to prove something is impossible? Proving something being impossible is easy. At least if it is ridiculous like you claim God to be.



God have created kinds at least according to the Bible and reality it seems. Noone argues about adaptation. We need to be sure what we call species. God have created for example a dog. If an evolutionist would found non existing race of a dog he could call it a missing link. It is no missing link. It is just a type of a dog. Why not assume its the same with all the fossils? It is just a variations of existing species that changed within the changing enviroment. Enviroment change so most animals probably have less or more fat storage or something like that to be able to adapt and the bones reflects that. Thats what adaptation is about.

''So to prove that creation is valid, one should have to simply not have an other valid proof.'' - Przemax - 2018


''To be proven innocent one should not be proven guilty.'' Actually it's, ''everyone is innocent until proven guilty''

I created the universe and it's true until you can prove it wrong.

If there were all kinds of fossils out there, that were like missing links because of their similarities and slight differences, we still wouldn't know that they were part of evolution, or if they simply were all different species created by God.