So now your using your conclusion that you drew as basis for your argument? That's convenient.
The only mention was that he was in talks to purchase another company, never said NH, people just assumed.
You might want to re-read those links. It was said quite explicitly on multiple occasions that NH has been contacted and a solution is in the works. NH claims nobody contacted them and no solution is forthcoming because there is nothing to solve. That's a fairly substantial contradiction, don't you think?
Eh, guys, too much drama on this topic
... We are in contact with GAW since their (our) early days, their CTO Mordica even included our patches in their cgminer fork (
https://github.com/jmordica/cgminer-gc3355) for their early-days hosted miners to work flawlessly on NiceHash. That said we have a good relationship, but all this mess with NiceHashlet and Hashlets using our pool ... they just messed things out ... Anyway - to put things simple - once again: there is nothing to sort out, Hashlet are working as designed (not-mining, business model build on profit sharing) and NiceHash is working as designed (free open market, anybody can use at at will). NiceHash had too big payout to sustain Hashlet business model, that's why they removed our service. Their PR was not correct on this matter, that's what we already told them and we hope they respect this and will not pump this issue even further. We are sure they will adapt their business model (this is the only thing that needs to be sorted out on their side, nothing to sort out at our side) and to include NiceHash, one of the most attractive free market mining solution available, back to Hashlet business. Let's that be all, over and out.