[Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide [1st Feb 2016] - page 28.

Quote from: Syke on October 06, 2014, 10:57:10 PM

Just admit you were wrong or that you lied to try and make your point and you got caught (again) and we can move on.

I never mentioned the tape-out issue. Now, on to the "28nm manufacturer" issue. Your answer?

Inaba ignores anything tough.

You never admitted you lied, so we have nothing to discuss. Once you admit you lied, we can move on... until then, you are just another liar, posting false information.

You lied Mr. Zerlan. Have you admitted it? No.

No need really as the evidence of your lies is in the FTC documents for all to see.

You really should just shut up and protect your own interests at this point you are just supporting the FTC and future criminal prosecution against you. You are a fool continuing to even post here out of pride or ignorance we are not certain which it is possibly both. It serves no other purpose than to make it the goal of many more to support agencies like the FTC to see BFL and yourself brought to proper justice.

What does anything you post here now have to do with the topic? It isn't and the moderators should be policing this and removing your off topic posts.

Inaba

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1000

Quote from: smoothie on October 06, 2014, 10:45:12 PM

Still waiting for a pdf of the logs.

And I'm waiting on the excuse for this:

Quote from: Syke on October 06, 2014, 10:57:10 PM

Just admit you were wrong or that you lied to try and make your point and you got caught (again) and we can move on.

I never mentioned the tape-out issue. Now, on to the "28nm manufacturer" issue. Your answer?

Inaba ignores anything tough.

You never admitted you lied, so we have nothing to discuss. Once you admit you lied, we can move on... until then, you are just another liar, posting false information, so why bother trying to have a conversation with you?

Lassi

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Burn the wings off those bastards.

Quote from: smoothie on October 06, 2014, 10:45:12 PM

Still waiting for a pdf of the logs.

And I'm waiting on the excuse for this:

Quote from: smoothie on October 06, 2014, 10:45:12 PM

Just admit you were wrong or that you lied to try and make your point and you got caught (again) and we can move on.

I never mentioned the tape-out issue. Now, on to the "28nm manufacturer" issue. Your answer?

Inaba ignores anything tough.

If his lawyer doesn't shut him up then I suspect he will do himself more harm than he already has to his own case. The more he tries to "justify" his misdeeds the deeper the hole he digs. He should not be worried about trying to "save" his reputation or "save" BFL. What he should be concerned with are the criminal charges and IRS audits which are coming.

Syke

legendary

Activity: 3878

Merit: 1193

Still waiting for a pdf of the logs.

And I'm waiting on the excuse for this:

Quote from: Inaba on October 06, 2014, 08:35:56 PM

Just admit you were wrong or that you lied to try and make your point and you got caught (again) and we can move on.

I never mentioned the tape-out issue. Now, on to the "28nm manufacturer" issue. Your answer?

Inaba ignores anything tough.

smoothie

legendary

Activity: 2492

Merit: 1473

LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper

Quote from: dogie on October 06, 2014, 07:43:54 PM

Quote from: smoothie on October 06, 2014, 07:23:01 PM

Quote from: dogie on October 06, 2014, 07:43:54 PM

I have a paper copy of the logs. They, of course, cherry picked the worst of it and took it out of context to try and make a case. That should tell you something.

Please scan the paper copy of the chat logs and post it as a pdf. Let us all see what was really in those chat logs.

Does anyone have an electronic copy they can use to verify the validity of his chat log copy?

The FTC have hard drive images stored of his computers. He wouldn't risk / bother editing the logs when the originals are in the FTC's hands.

I just compared my hardcopy to what's contained in the link. They appear to be the same. When you say missing pages, are you referring to the "Page X of 34" part or something else? If you are talking about the "Page XX" at the bottom of every page, I don't have those, either. You can rest assured that anything in there would not be helpful to their case, and since I conveniently can't access the records myself, I'm also in the dark. But thanks for pointing that out, I'll see what I can do about obtaining those.

Still waiting for a pdf of the logs.

Inaba

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1000

Quote from: smoothie on October 06, 2014, 07:23:01 PM

Quote from: dogie on October 06, 2014, 07:43:54 PM

I have a paper copy of the logs. They, of course, cherry picked the worst of it and took it out of context to try and make a case. That should tell you something.

Please scan the paper copy of the chat logs and post it as a pdf. Let us all see what was really in those chat logs.

Does anyone have an electronic copy they can use to verify the validity of his chat log copy?

The FTC have hard drive images stored of his computers. He wouldn't risk / bother editing the logs when the originals are in the FTC's hands.

I just compared my hardcopy to what's contained in the link. They appear to be the same. When you say missing pages, are you referring to the "Page X of 34" part or something else? If you are talking about the "Page XX" at the bottom of every page, I don't have those, either. You can rest assured that anything in there would not be helpful to their case, and since I conveniently can't access the records myself, I'm also in the dark. But thanks for pointing that out, I'll see what I can do about obtaining those.

smoothie

legendary

Activity: 2492

Merit: 1473

LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper

Quote from: smoothie on October 06, 2014, 07:23:01 PM

Quote from: smoothie on October 06, 2014, 07:23:01 PM

I have a paper copy of the logs. They, of course, cherry picked the worst of it and took it out of context to try and make a case. That should tell you something.

Please scan the paper copy of the chat logs and post it as a pdf. Let us all see what was really in those chat logs.

Does anyone have an electronic copy they can use to verify the validity of his chat log copy?

The FTC have hard drive images stored of his computers. He wouldn't risk / bother editing the logs when the originals are in the FTC's hands.

To make a point on this forum he would.

But that is just me making sure to cover all ends in my request.

dogie

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1185

dogiecoin.com

I have a paper copy of the logs. They, of course, cherry picked the worst of it and took it out of context to try and make a case. That should tell you something.

Please scan the paper copy of the chat logs and post it as a pdf. Let us all see what was really in those chat logs.

Does anyone have an electronic copy they can use to verify the validity of his chat log copy?

The FTC have hard drive images stored of his computers. He wouldn't risk / bother editing the logs when the originals are in the FTC's hands.

smoothie

legendary

Activity: 2492

Merit: 1473

LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper

I have a paper copy of the logs. They, of course, cherry picked the worst of it and took it out of context to try and make a case. That should tell you something.

Please scan the paper copy of the chat logs and post it as a pdf. Let us all see what was really in those chat logs.

Does anyone have an electronic copy they can use to verify the validity of his chat log copy?

smoothie

legendary

Activity: 2492

Merit: 1473

LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper

Quote from: Syke on October 06, 2014, 12:44:33 AM

Quote from: Inaba on October 06, 2014, 12:19:04 AM

So, lets see. Numerous edits were not made, in fact NO edits were made. As no edits were made, there could not have been a chance to of "leaving in place facts that were no longer true." Since the page wasn't edited, there was no "people editing the page knew they were no longer true statements" and by logical deduction, they could not have "chose to leave them in place."

I'm talking about other quotes on the Monarch page that were left in place even when they were no longer true. I showed one example (there are many). Why don't you address that issue instead of avoiding it? Let's start with the claim "BFL is the only 28nm chip manufacturer on its 2nd generation ASIC." Why was that quote left in place during edits even when it was no longer true?

Just admit you were wrong or that you lied to try and make your point and you got caught (again) and we can move on.

Let us stop focusing on spilled milk and focus on the equivalent Armageddon at hand in your pathetic and shady business practices
Thanks! Lol

smoothie

legendary

Activity: 2492

Merit: 1473

LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper

Quote from: Inaba on October 01, 2014, 01:09:32 PM

No, I don't.

Lol

How is it that you were able to buy a half million dollar house?

Crunch time Josh! Better start back pedaling faster! Grin

daddyfatsax

hero member

Activity: 857

Merit: 1000

Anger is a gift.

Quote from: dogie on October 06, 2014, 06:30:13 PM

Quote from: daddyfatsax on October 06, 2014, 06:09:34 PM

Quote from: daddyfatsax on October 06, 2014, 06:09:34 PM

I have a paper copy of the logs. They, of course, cherry picked the worst of it and took it out of context to try and make a case. That should tell you something.

So somewhere in the logs you magically redeem yourself from being a total piece of shit? I highly doubt that.

What he's saying is that when you cut down so many months of logs and just leave the negative / potentially negative conversations, it can look worse than it actually is. Thats why I want someone to post the entire log so we get the full unadulterated picture. Maybe its 10x worse, maybe its not, but at least then we don't have to infer. I'm surprised it wasn't one of the first pieces that BFL put up in their initial defence. Are you currently allowed to distribute those logs, Josh? Just ram it through one of those feed scanners and it'll generate the PDF. Then we get to see.

I know what he is trying to say, but unless he was saving small children from wells or helping old ladies cross the street, there is absolutely nothing those full logs could contain to make me or anyone else change their minds about BFL.

I normally steer away from all the BFL shit, but fucking Josh... "They cherry picked the logs to make us look bad!!!" No, you dumb shit, you did it yourself.

dogie

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1185

dogiecoin.com

I have a paper copy of the logs. They, of course, cherry picked the worst of it and took it out of context to try and make a case. That should tell you something.

So somewhere in the logs you magically redeem yourself from being a total piece of shit? I highly doubt that.

What he's saying is that when you cut down so many months of logs and just leave the negative / potentially negative conversations, it can look worse than it actually is. Thats why I want someone to post the entire log so we get the full unadulterated picture. Maybe its 10x worse, maybe its not, but at least then we don't have to infer. I'm surprised it wasn't one of the first pieces that BFL put up in their initial defence. Are you currently allowed to distribute those logs, Josh? Just ram it through one of those feed scanners and it'll generate the PDF. Then we get to see.

Mirdude

sr. member

Activity: 319

Merit: 250

Thank you for this list, it's very handy as I was looking for something like this.

JoTheKhan

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: Inaba on October 01, 2014, 10:06:22 AM

I have a paper copy of the logs. They, of course, cherry picked the worst of it and took it out of context to try and make a case. That should tell you something.

I don't have access to anything more than anyone else as far as that goes.

Lol this guy lies a lot.

Edit: For Context, the second quote is in reply to this.

Quote from: dogie on October 01, 2014, 07:00:52 AM

Quote from: Inaba on September 30, 2014, 11:11:15 PM

Quote from: dogie on September 30, 2014, 08:28:17 PM

Quote from: Inaba on September 30, 2014, 07:04:12 PM

It was true at the time the advertisement was made, which was the point of the accusations made which I was responding to. Don't try to play semantic games to make your false statements appear to be true (oddly enough Dogie appears to be the rational one in this case... Mind blown).

Dick Trickle there was asking about false advertising and I was responding. We did absolutely believe we would tape out in August when that ad copy was created.

That's the problem with the cut and chopped version of the chat logs, people are going to move time around to fit their version of the story. You should post the full chat log as its going to come out / be requested anyway.

That is the complete chat logs. I had nothing to do with the release of that information, that was all the FTC and they released everything as far as I can tell.

Its not the original chat log I mean. It skips from page 7 to 55, 57 to 83 etc. The original chat log was found on your computer, to which the FTC imaged but you would also have a copy still. Are you back on Kansas time?

daddyfatsax

hero member

Activity: 857

Merit: 1000

Anger is a gift.