This is after the fact that Hashking has admitted a fuckup, 'insured' apparently meant 'in pirate@40's wallet', I am not discussing what 'insured' should have meant because we all know that, but what I feel should be done now to remedy the situation, and what can be fairly acheived given there isn't enough money to meet obligations fully.
The problem is that everyone who makes such an argument has an interest in the payoff schedule that pays them the most the quickest. If the payoff is going to be proportional to amount owed, there's no reason to treat interest earned prior to default any different from principles deposited after default. Anyone who earned interest prior to default could have withdrawn it and re-deposited as principle. That should, obviously, have no effect. People who rolled over interest they could have withdrawn trusted him with those funds just as much as people who deposited principle did.As disclosure my deposit is quite small and according to his way of doing it I'd be in the next day or so's payouts, unless I've been ruffling his feathers too much :0 Maybe I *am* blinkered w.r.t interest payback, but what I was proposing would still leave me in a less advantageous position than the way he seems to be doing it. Anyway this is academic as he seems to have settled upon his own way of winding down without being drawn into discussion, I can understand why, and unless somebody does call the recievers in it's hashking's perogative to do so.
