Topic: ICO Reviews, trust them or NOT? - page 13. (Read 2296 times)
I would rather not trust any paid review, it is common sense that these are surely going to be biased. I would rather go for ICOs like Qurrex that have independent reviews that are really good.
I only trust them if most, if not all, review sites say the same thing.
You shouldn't trust them because there is not that much people looking to help people, they just want to make as much cash as they can. So yea....that's what you should do. Yes they are all corrupt ...
Most of them are probably bought but I wouldn't go so far as to say they're all corrupt. At least some try to be unbiased.
I only trust them if most, if not all, review sites say the same thing.
I don't like ICO reviews and ratings because a lot of them are paid and we can't know which are paid and which are not.
I like the ICO aggregtor sites, because they list all the information about the project in a convenient way though.
I like the ICO aggregtor sites, because they list all the information about the project in a convenient way though.
Though ICO ratings and reviews are the basis of most investors i dont rely on it personally. I have seen how developers boost ICO ratings. Sometimes by pushing the bounty hunters and airdroppers to vote for their ICOs in the ICO rating and reviews site. I was even asked to vote.
I don't trust ICO reviews. I may use them for an idea, but always do my own research and have my own opinion.
A lot of reviews are made for money and they are not so truthful and honest.
A lot of reviews are made for money and they are not so truthful and honest.
I have some trusted channels when it comes to deciding if I should invest in the ICO or not. But there is a sea full of shillers and people who are being paid for presenting a project in better light than it deserves to be presented. Avoid most of the Youtube reviewers, those tend to be the worst (with some bright exceptions).
It all depends on the project. If this is not a necessary deception to anyone then all who promote it are deceivers. And if it is a worthy product that all who helps to draw attention in it are worthy respect.
Yes they are all corrupt ...
I don't trust reviews. because they could have been paid for. I always do my own research and choose a project.
Yes,we need to do our own research because it is our money and anyone can be bought so most of them were just paid advertisement for that project so invest on your own risk.If someone really knows the good project then they will invest on them and can be a millionaire.
I would like to believe that their assessment is really professional and objective.
But experience has shown that projects that gave a bad evaluation fell on the stock exchanges and traded. Projects with high ratings on the contrary, remained on the purse and are not traded anywhere.
I do not know what they are guided by, but I would not trust them blindly.
But experience has shown that projects that gave a bad evaluation fell on the stock exchanges and traded. Projects with high ratings on the contrary, remained on the purse and are not traded anywhere.
I do not know what they are guided by, but I would not trust them blindly.
I don't trust reviews. because they could have been paid for. I always do my own research and choose a project.
People are even getting paid to review ICO's on ICOBench. Obviously, not all the reviews are paid, but the incentives for both company and reviewer are too high to remain 100% integrity. Other ICO rating sites I hardly even look at, your own research and gut feeling is worth way more than somebody's (paid) opinion. Read WP, research team and maybe follow some people who have proven to have made the right calls before and their advice has been proven solid.
I am looking at www.icoguide.com and it seems that they have very realistic reviews.
You can use this site: tokenmarket.net. There is an ongoing list of ICOs and many ICOs are on the way. There is a lot of analysis in this site and I think this is a secure site
it's like watching the news, make you want of it but do your own research. Can't just take people's word for it
Trust to yourself. Before perticipating in any ICO I often deeple research the project. My advice is to pay attention whether the projects has a ready-made product as it is some kind of guarentee that it is not a scam as well as long termed activity before ICO. It is an indicator that team goes stright to thir goal and will not give up.
I do not believe rating sites, because I believe that these estimates are easy to buy and people with money can manipulate it. Recently I read an interesting article about the popular icobench site with exposure. I think there's more truth to it.
Jump to: