So you agree in an utopian fantasy world AND in the real world?
No, I agree with you conceptually if that reality existed, but it doesn't.
Well, so what happened to Mark Karpeles aka CEO of Mt.GOX ? He is still a free man and no one is going to lynch him ? Good that we know him right...
First of all, the legal system of the state is usually slow and inept at bringing justice. The investigators just released their preliminary reports and he still might find jail time.
Secondly, regardless if the state is effectual or not there is a another type of justice which is immediately brought to light with frauds like Josh Garza and Mark Karpeles. They have to hire body guards , they have to spend a lot of resources and forever fear that retribution will be around the corner, they are socially ostracized, they will have a really hard time with any future business pursuits or contracts. Their credibility is shot.
With a pseudonym you aren't putting much on the line. Once you commit the fraud or fuck up , you can just create a new persona. Do you really believe that there are separate dev teams for all 700+ pump and dump scamcoins ? No, of course not, there are anonymous devs recreating new scams and ponzis when the last one folds all the time.
If Gavin commits some malicious code to steal bitcoin's in the next core release we can go after him.
No, he will say that the key was compromised and he didn't know about that.
Than we can scrutinize and investigate to validate. Additionally, that was one of the original criticisms of NxT that Jeff mentioned-
“What is necessary, for NXT or any other crypto-finance software, is to prove independent reproducibility. The next step is to proactively have developers and community members cross-check each other, to make sure the build produced is the same for all. This helps ensure that the release manager is not under duress, unknowingly infected with malware, or corrupt. No security solution is perfect, but it raises the bar significantly. You should never trust just one person to produce release binaries, in any crypto-finance project. That’s called a Single Point of Failure, and it is easy to attack such a narrow victim vector.”
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitcoin-core-developer-jeff-garzik-believes-nxt-is-a-scamcoin/NxT has a single point of failure , while the bitcoin core team cross checks each other with each build. Additionally, Bitcoin has multiple implementations interacting with the blockchain, so you don't even have to trust Gavin or the rest of the core team.
What I have noticed you doing repeatedly is making a shifting the sands or moving the goal posts logic fallacy by repeatedly discussing flaws or weaknesses within the improvements we are suggesting instead of realizing what any security researcher knows that nothing is 100% secure and we can only make attempts at increasing the levels of security.