Yes product is very important for any project even you can see market apple is well known for its products similarly other companies. If company does not have product than there will not be growth of particular company.
It will not get any business expansion and investment from public. Let me give you example ---
You guyz are investing in ICOs what you guyz see in the ICO may be product or service which they are work on it and roadmap of development project. So product is the backbone of any project.
Topic: Is product important for a project? - page 56. (Read 225005 times)
Yes it can help a lot the product result for endorcing project as basis and example of good result. Because usually to choose good project is find or know the background of it especially if it is successful and not failed.
If there is no product, no one will buy the project. It is pointless to invest in an empty space where there is nothing
Of course. There is no alternative. A product is a face and first look for a project.
Initial ICO’s and their program, future plan are depend upon a product how it presented or how it is used. It is easy to take a invest decision if a product can make us interested. Even a project can never be successful if the product basis and related others things is clear and reachable.
Initial ICO’s and their program, future plan are depend upon a product how it presented or how it is used. It is easy to take a invest decision if a product can make us interested. Even a project can never be successful if the product basis and related others things is clear and reachable.
That is certainly an edge of an ICO on the off chance that they have effectively accessible item. I figure we should avoid ICOs that will simply dispatch their item once they as of now raise a sum. I trust the cash raised ought to be use to enhance the item and not to influence the item as this will to indicate how they oversee and how able the organization in this sort of market.
obviously it is, why would you even invest in something that has nothing to offer int he first place right? It's just short of scamming yourself out of a ghost project lol. I understand there are projects that will have a soon to be readied product, but most of them already has a working MVP (minimum viable product) of the project, not just ready to be released for full time commercial usage.
Product is the most important for the whole project and when I choose ICO I first of all pay attention to the product itself.
I believe that the importance for ICO is the product, and this product must be good and interesting.
Most often, the product is important for the company. And it seems to me that such a company has more chances of success.
The product s a vital aspect of the project. T speaks lot bout the continuity nd the future of such project. Though these days eiple tend to focus more attention on the amount they get paid far more than the product itself. Investors majoly focus on the durility of the project. ..
Yeah, I think it's important. This adds confidence to the project. The usual idea is now difficult to interest someone. Everyone wants to see the result, to see a guarantee that the project really has serious intentions.
yes it is very important, as investors will be looking upto something that would compel them to make investments.
If a project has minimum working product, then it is huge advantage. It shows that the team has serious attitude and plan to develop their project and don't think only about money.
For my opinion the product is very important for the project. Of course the product may be technology. Not necessarily in kind. If the product is not an important item, it is a scam.
It all depends on what type of project it is. If you see a stellar team of assistants and steep, it is possible to forgive all and to invest.
I changed my approach to analysis and now I look first of all if the project has a product. If there is no product, then I see if there are any plans for its release. Now these are my main criteria.
Yes, projects without products are equal to air. Having ready-made products will win the trust of more people. Their blueprints will be planned in great detail. I believe this is something that investors are very willing to see.
the developer of service works on deliverance as providing with use as returns of strategics as applying different unit of indication to prepare as one to put on parts with distribution of resource as defining initials on price with the token as investors to collects with decision of exchange and more with developer to gains of coverage on backup with funding to supports of terms with following attains on field with the bitcoin business.
Obviously it's vital for an ICO. For me I continually searching for an ICO which contains some particular necessities, one of them is ICO ought to have in any event Alpha or Demo variant of item before ICO beginning.
As a matter of fact, I consider most ICOs out there simply discuss their ideas with no item improvements, in the event that they truly need to make their ICO genuinely, they won't be that rush, they should deal with item first.
As a matter of fact, I consider most ICOs out there simply discuss their ideas with no item improvements, in the event that they truly need to make their ICO genuinely, they won't be that rush, they should deal with item first.
It is vital that they have a stage or they can set up while after their ICO, without a current stage, a token is futile and can be consider a clone cloin of other task, this is the reason that we check the group behind it and check on the off chance that they are specialists at a field where they need a stage set up.
Jump to: