KYC for bounty hunters?
Sincerely speaking from my own perspective there are disadvantages and advantages to it but both are interwoven it prevents cheaters and also prevents some bounty hunters to receive their hard earned tokens.
Topic: KYC of bounty hunters - page 13. (Read 6981 times)
I think this is good for preventing the occurrence of bounty cheats such as multi accounts, and also KYC is very helpful to collect valid participant data, and make bounty participants not only silent waiting when it has completed its task, but is required to continue to monitor the progress of the project
I think it's very unprofessional on the part of developers if the need for this procedure was not negotiated for earlier. This is one reason to think about quality of project for all investors
Me i dont want to bounty that are using kyc cause all of personal information are asking it they can use it for some illegal activity so im against it for me that kyc needed to be remove.
For the team, then KYC can avoid legal problems.
For us, this may cause unnecessary trouble because the security of KYC data is not guaranteed.
For us, this may cause unnecessary trouble because the security of KYC data is not guaranteed.
If I think this is not the best solution, because now I've sent my data to some famous company on an Ico, but I never know how dangerous it's all I've done, but if it's part of their ICO rules then be the best .
I think it's very wise because by doing KYC payment acceptance will be appropriate to the original account and not a multi-user account. And I also think that the project use KYC has the potential for great success in the future.
on one side is certainly well because for security reasons both to the customer and the bounty himself. However, it will also become a danger if the identity that is sent will be misused by third parties. This certainly could make its own danger to us because it is an important data about the information themselves.
The purpose of the existence of KYC in this bounty is to security systems. Where is this form of crime is now in the crypto is increasingly diverse. One of them, namely the existence of a multi-user account. And to prevent it from happening, so KYC is one solution.
Too many people are doing airdrop & bounty, its being harder to get free stuff lately
I think it is a good decision which is geared towards enhancing fairness in bounty campaigns because some bounty hunters always try to cheat just to get more tokens.
Personally I strongly disagree about this issue of KYC for bounty hunters, I don't want to share my personal ddetails with some cocompany. There are some companies that I trust and believe in too. But some of them, asking KYC to receive about 30$, I believe it is ridiculous and someday and someone will make bounty campaign to collect a lot of private data like passports, address, residence, phones, wallet address. And it scares me.
The existence of these KYC system, then the system claim the prize will be very safe. This will avoid the multi account. And I think this is good for security systems. And I have no problem with the existence of this KYC.
Yes certainly, this could be dangerous. What if they will use your identity for doing something which is not good or illegal? What can we do with it? Having no knowledge of what could have happened to the info we have submitted we will be unaware of what might happen in case our identities were used. Perhaps this should be resolved such that we should also know if somebody is viewing the files we have submitted. Maybe it would be a bit fair to know who watches us.
Much has been said about this, but I will also express my point of view. I'm not against verification, the main thing is that it was adequate and warned about this in advance, and not at the last minute, and that it is necessary to pass KYC within one day.
Many exchanges do not want to steal a coin if there are investors in it who did not pass the SCC. Even if they are bounties. The legislative law in the field of securities is very inert and conservative.
For the survival of the crypto business world the KYC registration cannot be avoided by most ICOs. These requirements are necessary for the protection of the investors, that's what they say. I think the process is not optional to bounty hunters.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
In my own opinion, kyc for bounty hunters is not required because they are just advertisers for the ico to benefit by getting a lot of investors so kyc is not necessary for bounty hunters.
I think because maybe it's a lot of accounts that are very abusive and not qualified within us etc so they need kyc for the members and would not have to cause a big problem with the acquired deatails in our
This is correct from one point of view, but why reveal your personality. We came to the world of crypto when it was completely anonymous and I like it. As for me if you are an investor and the ICO project is cool then there's nothing wrong with it, but if you want to remain unchanged and chew on your documents it is better not to do so.
The procedure of KYC today strongly resembles compulsory verification used in police stations, I think this is a violation of people's freedoms, so I do not take part in such operations, especially when you are a bounty hunter.
To avoid this kind of claims, we do not need KYC
Jump to: