Topic: KYC of bounty hunters - page 11. (Read 7016 times)
From my perspective kyc for bounty hunter have a good side and bad side. Good side is to prevent some cheaters who use multiple account for that bounty. Bad side, kyc for me is annoying thing there is a task for claim my reward.
KYC so far, i like this rules, one of the best things to do to make atleast void all the hunters who do or participate more account in one person. you know its really unfair to anyone that they gave their efforts and suddenly i noticed that others are doing more account.
It seems to me that the procedure of KYC very seriously violates the integrity of this kind of activity. Because KYC is a complete verification, but you are not a fool either, you can produce fake documents.
Of course sometimes it strains especially when you do not take your documents but for safety it's a plus
Great comments in here. I never saw it from the perspective of how damaging KYC is the the crypto community. I for one will never send my info into these types of projects nor will I invest in them. Great job guys calling out this KYC nonsense.
Its a bad thing in my opinion to do KYC in bounty campaigns because the anonymousity that cryptocurrency promotes will be gone. So i dont agree in doing KYC in bounty campaigns and airdrop campaigns
To be honest I never agreed about KYC for bounty hunter because us as a bounty hunter is not buy the tokens and not invest on the ICO but to prevent multiple account and cheaters on bounties, I will agree KYC for bounty hunters. Make cheaters die.
Indeed unquestionably, this could be unsafe. Consider the possibility that they will utilize your character for accomplishing something which isn't great or illicit. What would we be able to do with it? Having no information of what could have happened to the data we have submitted we will be uninformed of what may occur in the event that our characters were utilized. Maybe this ought to be settled with the end goal that we ought to likewise know whether some person is seeing the documents we have submitted. Possibly it would be somewhat reasonable for know who watches us.
It's like you sell your information for buyer and receive the token. It is very dangerous and so much ICOs don't succesful. You will not receive token, hello scammer 
I think KYC form - this is most often illegal actions on the part of the company, which requires filling out KYC. Do you remember that, would we ever give out an ID scan to buy Bitcoin or Ether? I do not remember this .. The form of KYC has recently become more common, and not only in the bounty of companies for payments, but for investors. I hope this will end soon !!
I am not in favor but if that's how should be, then let it be. But I am cautious in providing my personal information. I see to it that bounty campaign I am providing my details is really a good project. KYC process helps the company comply with its legal requirements in their country based.
I think that you should not give your password, even if you think that the bounty of the company in which you want to participate good. A lot of scams and you risk giving your personal data in the hands of unknown.
I also don't like this trend of being forced to submit KYC just for bounty hunters. It makes sense if you invest a large sum and it needs to be done to counter act money laundering, but most people who do bounties earn very little on them, especially since this downturn. I stay away of these projects. They will also likely have less supporters and be less successful as a result of it.
I think it's bad impact and good impact. the bad impact that our ID can be used to do things that harm to us. It is very dangerous for you to trust unlinked individuals with your information and for the future of cryptos as a whole, but no one is discussing this. And the good impact is to prevent bounty hunter using multiple accounts.
KYC may be necessary for everyone, but I don't like for KYC after reward campaigns. Rules should not be changed later
If the jurisdiction of the company where it operates require that all holder, investors and bounty hunters alike, to make KYC, we have no choice. Otherwise, we will not be paid. I do not think all campaigns require KYC, mostly those who are based in the USA requires them.
KYC for bounty is totally unnecessary, except you want to kill your project I will advice that it should be avoided.
Cryptocurrency community take issue of privacy very seriously and most KYC project have not done well as a result of this.
Cryptocurrency community take issue of privacy very seriously and most KYC project have not done well as a result of this.
Usually, if I see that I have earned not as many money as I wanted to earn and they furthermore asking me the kyc document passing, I just pass out this bounty and forget about it. This is my way of doing things.
And what are the objective reasons not to pass the KYC if you have already earned money? It seems to me that if you have shown your documents several times, they probably already have everyone who needs them.
Usually, if I see that I have earned not as many money as I wanted to earn and they furthermore asking me the kyc document passing, I just pass out this bounty and forget about it. This is my way of doing things.
it all depends on the development of a project if they have a very good development and potential then I will do the KYC as requested by the project but if it would just be a junk coin then I would not do anything
Jump to: