Topic: KYC of bounty hunters - page 12. (Read 6981 times)
I think there is nothing wrong with this, especially when it is enough to provide a driver's license. Passage of identification also excludes bots, which allows you to earn more
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I am a bounty hunter and I find this KYS a burden because some of ICO are so strict and does not even pay even you worked for them already because your KYC is not approved by them. Some ICO use KYC as an excuse to not to pay what you have worked for. I hope KYC will not continue. It is really a negative thing for me to have KYC approval based on my experience.
Having KYC verification is not good, for me , bounty hunters are just working for them and they do not need to submit certain documents or IDs where their information is barely passed to the ICO. It will have a very high risk for their information to be mislead or used for a certain thing by that ICO. KYC is better to be applied for those who are investing for their project.
If the project is original and good I don't see why not - only means they are doing a good job by protecting us from bounty scammers.
i think KYC have a positive and nagative side.
with KYC 1 hunter just cant use 1 passport and it can minimalize bot user.
but KYC will be bad if the project was scam, all submitted KYC document can be collect by wrong/bad persons and use to something bad.
with KYC 1 hunter just cant use 1 passport and it can minimalize bot user.
but KYC will be bad if the project was scam, all submitted KYC document can be collect by wrong/bad persons and use to something bad.
They are saying that if you are the real bounty hunters thats why they require kyc but i wonder why they need of picture only ico made that if you are bounty hunters nothing picture require i think this is the new tactic of the team to scam another project using your identity i think this bad.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
For investors to perform similar operation - it still can be understood as projects insure themselves that the law of some countries was observed and their citizens couldn't take part. And here when for participants of a baunta think out, it of course isn't absolutely clear. Probably to reduce payments as not all want to pass it.
Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures are a critical function to assess and monitor customer risk; and a legal requirement to comply with Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Laws.
I think, this is a requirement for ICOs and bounties and i support KYC system. Also we have to research bounties before join them.
I think, this is a requirement for ICOs and bounties and i support KYC system. Also we have to research bounties before join them.
I hope that the projects that make KYC are only for those who only invest in their projects and not for the bounty hunters. Hunters hid their identities at the same hunter to help them promote their project. This is also not good for everyone's privacy. It's a big NO for me regarding KYC for bounty hunters.
After doing some resareach i do not really like that the fact that there are some icoor bounties which reuqire an kyc i would not give my data to some start ups!
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
This development is very good, because by using KYC the developers of the bounty is not to worry about the participants who use multiple accounts. so they get the participants with the original amount. no one is using a fake account
The "Typform service" was recently hacked, and this is a very unpleasant call. Perhaps this will encourage the industry to switch to services like Civic, Bitcoinswiss so that you do not have to give your passport to each project personally.
The common database also does not inspire confidence. Personally, I don't understand why they need it. I am ready to provide my personal data, but it is only the Name, Surname and Citizenship. The rest I covered and will cover up in the photo. 
They are doing this because the government in their country requires them to do so. So for them to adequately operate and build their platform, they have to comply with the rules and regulations implemented by their country. So yes. I support KYC because it seems to me that the campaign itself is legit. But that doesn't mean that all with KYC are legit.
For numerous customers of ICO feel KYC is inappropriate for their limited investment and a inordinate overhead with unwanted risks.
The "Typform service" was recently hacked, and this is a very unpleasant call. Perhaps this will encourage the industry to switch to services like Civic, Bitcoinswiss so that you do not have to give your passport to each project personally.
People should not have to do KYC verification's, if crypto is meant to be anonymous then they should just make it remain that way.
The "Typform service" was recently hacked, and this is a very unpleasant call. Perhaps this will encourage the industry to switch to services like Civic, Bitcoinswiss so that you do not have to give your passport to each project personally.
only because they did not understand themselves.
And no doubt to give the less bounty as possible
Perhaps also to avoid fraud, but to do this there are other methods, such as using your own site (not google of course, that's so lazy) then check IP, VPN/TOR, browser fingerprint, and so on..
I express my protest against these KYC for bounty hunters, because I just do not understand why they are needed. After all, bounty hunters do not actually pay any money to developers. Therefore, most likely the developers introduce this process, only because they did not understand themselves.
I see there are two sides. One side is, it better to ask KYC because to protect the bounty programs from scammers and cheaters. Some of the members maintaining multiple accounts to participate bounty program. Some of the member user other accounts to get rewards. If we consider about those facts, it is better to have KYC process for bounty hunters.
second thing is, KYC is the most valuable document for the person. KYC documents are Priceless. If someone stole KYC, he can a lot terrible thing with that person's' identity. If the bounty program related ICO is not a rated and well know ICO, then I'll not submit my KYC to get the rewards.
second thing is, KYC is the most valuable document for the person. KYC documents are Priceless. If someone stole KYC, he can a lot terrible thing with that person's' identity. If the bounty program related ICO is not a rated and well know ICO, then I'll not submit my KYC to get the rewards.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
its unfair if they would just implement it before coin distribution maybe they should add this requirements at the start of the bounty campaign. but in positive views kyc can eliminate other bounty hunters to join multiple accounts in one campaign. Jump to: