Topic: Less participants / More participants in Bounty - Which one do you prefer ? - page 8. (Read 858 times)
April 16, 2018, 09:31:36 AM
Of course, I would have to choose those ICO's that has a fewer participants since the reward would surely be bigger than those who have plenty of participants. Some Ico does not limit the numbere. participants.
April 16, 2018, 08:52:21 AM
I prefer fewer participants. I think the rewards will be bigger. In addition we never know what surprises are in it.
April 16, 2018, 08:38:36 AM
I usually take on projects that are already running and have already reached the minimum funding limit. I think it's safer. If there are fewer participants it is better, but I also consider the size of the project value.
April 16, 2018, 05:39:17 AM
A small number of participants often means that the project is of no interest to anyone. Therefore the result of your work can be very cheap or not worth anything. Choosing a bounty by the number of participants is wrong. It is necessary to look at the question from all sides
April 16, 2018, 05:38:15 AM
I prefer to see the concepts and the allocation of the bounty in advance of judging on the number of participants. Maybe it's just a bonus because of course if the fewer participants then the results obtained will be great. but not entirely be a reference ICO will succeed.
April 16, 2018, 05:37:38 AM
I agree that it depends primarily on the idea of the project and the team. But of course better there, where there will be fewer participants. Since there you will get more coins. Also, you can choose projects that set a pool as % of collected funds.
April 16, 2018, 05:37:30 AM
less participants would be good to bounty hunters but it can be a bad side to the ICOs. less participants less exposure of the project but with many participating the more exposure of the project will get. many will get interest and possibly invest to it.
April 16, 2018, 05:35:18 AM
I really don't care about the number of participants, because rewards in those bounty campaigns split for each participants works. The more you work, the more you earn and the main points to get good rewards is quanlity of works. Do everthing follow the rules than you will get good rewards.
April 16, 2018, 05:30:02 AM
Ammount of participants are not the most important thing in Bounty. Of course, smaller ammount = bigger profit but not always.
More important thins is development team, community etc, because if we do not focus on the most important, we will be able to lose everything when the campaign turns out to be a scam
Yes the amount of the participants is not the most important thing but the project and its development team is very important on which the project can encourage investors to invest and make it successful and the participants of the bounty spread it to the investors to make it popular and support it. More important thins is development team, community etc, because if we do not focus on the most important, we will be able to lose everything when the campaign turns out to be a scam
April 16, 2018, 05:12:49 AM
I like bounties that are popular because that probably means that they have a good project to offer and subsequently their coin will have a bigger value in the future.
April 16, 2018, 05:12:20 AM
if in my opinion more participants are better because who get the best gift of him the best .. and with many participants we can learn a lot more. if the little participant is less comfortable in my opinion
April 16, 2018, 05:05:49 AM
The Bounty Campaign is so hot and great . We can earn a big profit with Bounty Campaigns .
Sometimes , you see some Bounties which have less participants or more participants ? Have you already think about which one do you prefer ?
Less participants / More participants in Bounty - Which one do you prefer ?
I think we should keep the balance. Very often, companies have a small number of participants, because they are not sufficiently covered, which negatively affects the attraction of investments. At the same time, campaigns with a large number of participants often pay very little. Therefore, the most attractive look of bounty, where the payment is fixed for each participant and must be paid in tokens. Sometimes , you see some Bounties which have less participants or more participants ? Have you already think about which one do you prefer ?
Less participants / More participants in Bounty - Which one do you prefer ?
April 16, 2018, 05:02:06 AM
The Bounty Campaign is so hot and great . We can earn a big profit with Bounty Campaigns .
Sometimes , you see some Bounties which have less participants or more participants ? Have you already think about which one do you prefer ?
Less participants / More participants in Bounty - Which one do you prefer ?
I prefer golden middle! As a lot of participants, means you are rewarded less among all of participants, but you can see that the project has high interest from the community! Less participants means more rewards, but you might end up with nothing, as the project will turn out scam or the coin will not get any value, after the ICO finishes! So there is advantages and disadvantages of both more/less participants. Sometimes , you see some Bounties which have less participants or more participants ? Have you already think about which one do you prefer ?
Less participants / More participants in Bounty - Which one do you prefer ?
April 16, 2018, 04:59:36 AM
i don't mind about less of participants or more participants while enrolling bounties programs because in my opinion the number of participants will not guarantee the particular project will sucessfully or not and as long as the project will sucessfully and the price are decent when listed to the exchange it does not matter for me
April 16, 2018, 04:57:57 AM
Ammount of participants are not the most important thing in Bounty. Of course, smaller ammount = bigger profit but not always.
More important thins is development team, community etc, because if we do not focus on the most important, we will be able to lose everything when the campaign turns out to be a scam
More important thins is development team, community etc, because if we do not focus on the most important, we will be able to lose everything when the campaign turns out to be a scam
April 16, 2018, 04:49:00 AM
I don't pay much attention to the participants in a bounty. I focus on the quality of the project. A good project is likely to attract more participants.
April 16, 2018, 04:41:58 AM
Main idea is participate on solid project. Then less participants. But I wouldn't pass one solid project just because of more participants.
April 16, 2018, 04:38:18 AM
The Bounty Campaign is so hot and great . We can earn a big profit with Bounty Campaigns .
Sometimes , you see some Bounties which have less participants or more participants ? Have you already think about which one do you prefer ?
Less participants / More participants in Bounty - Which one do you prefer ?
Sometimes , you see some Bounties which have less participants or more participants ? Have you already think about which one do you prefer ?
Less participants / More participants in Bounty - Which one do you prefer ?
If i have a concern to the succes of project it is better to hire more participants so that promotion will be easier and a good way of marketing strategy.
that's the real purpose of of bounty campaign, The Less participant you have in a bounty the lesser fame, attraction and interest you will gain to your project, but if A bounty campaign is sure win win project then there's no need to hire more participants because the project itself will attract whale investors.
April 16, 2018, 04:31:43 AM
Well, definately i must preferrable to less participants in bounty campaign because it has a big token dividen to be distributed to the successful bounties participants in the end this is because of a few memeber being work and remain during the campaign period.
April 16, 2018, 04:16:13 AM
I prefer less or limited number of participants to be able to get a bigger share of the bounty pool. Because if a certain bounty has many participants then number of tokens per participants is quite small.
Jump to: