Since decipher11 reverse engineered the Reversal System.
Do you know why the 4,8,16,23 is not always correct?
For the DAX Daily Reversals it is not uncommon to be 4,7,15,22 or 4,12,20,23
Why are these Reversal Timings changing?
The DAX Yearly Bearish Reversals from the 2000 High are supposedly 4,5,13,X
which is a timing more consistent with the Dow/commodities.
Sometimes the Start is not the High but instead the highest close.
Is there any possibility to find the formula for Entropy/Energy Model?
Correct? There is nothing correct about reversals. They are
Hocus Pocus. I would say the principles outlined at
The Reversal System - Engineering Background reveal more about the system than what that fraud
Martin Armstrong would like to see.
You could make your own trading system based on these principles and you would
lose roughly the same amount of money except you would save the Socrates subscription, so they would be better.
That reminds me of the yearly bullish reversal he said in February was elected for wheat futures:
Hey coder hope u doing well if u need any help with your trading, you just let me know, the trick is only play the gaps between reversals.
It's dead simple strategy, let me know if up for it
If I see a nice trade would u be interested
He is
DESPERATE.
For those who do not know who
Gumbi is:
Martin Armstrong himself! Proof:
Martin Armstrong The Hyper Shill Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.
Read this blog
starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.
See
armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.
Every single defrauded person should report their case, see
Where and how to complain
PLEASE keep in mind that while the dollar may end up as a safe haven for Europe, DO NOT expect that to last beyond 2 years at best. There is nothing which is permanent as we head into 2032.
source:
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/politics/comment-from-texas-the-end-result/This is a complete reversal of Armstrong's claim that the dollar is the long term reserve currency when it would be the LAST to fall AFTER all other currencies have fallen. This is just another attempt at capitalizing on fear to sell more drivel, vis-a-vis reports.
I don't think it contradiction or reversal at all. How do you figure that?
Any Socrates traders come join us on the FB group:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/ecmtraders.. in case it gets deleted.
Update: And it WAS deleted. See the other nonsense posts of
origin-AL.
The Armstrong pros at facebook.
Getting so
DESPERATE they need to quote a month old post to advertise their group .. because nobody wants to show up there and be seen as an idiot.
We know that this bitcointalk forum is by far the most popular public uncensored forum about
Martin Armstrong on the internet. What else has over 600,000 reads?
So if you post here you better know what you are doing.
Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.
Read this blog
starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.
See
armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.
Every single defrauded person should report their case, see
Where and how to complain
Help with Socrates
Over at the
"Unofficial Armstrong Economics Fan Forum" member CuChulainn88 is asking for
"help with Socrates".
Because I was in exactly the same situation more than a year ago, and since I have since analyzed the Socrates system, I will provide some relevant unsolicited advice, with the intention to reduce the frustration of
member CuChulainn88 and other Socrates users in the future. Why so much pain?
First we have to distinguish between two different aspects that apply to all signals emitted by Socrates.
- The plausible background and explanation of the signal - whether it makes sense or not
- The effectiveness of the signal in the context of trading
One could easily ignore the first point, the plausible background and just measure the success of applying the signals. By trial and error so to speak. This is in my opinion the smarter approach, because it is faster and one does not need to spend all the energy trying to prove or disprove the effects underlying the many signals that may or may not exist or be valid.
It has been my experience that there is nothing in the Socrates system that works - statistically - based on the 2nd aspect of trial and error with over 33,000 signals tested.However, I also spent time trying to
UNDERSTAND the system from the first aspect. This is actually a trap for people who think they are really smart, and even for people who are indeed smart.
Because if the system is no good and fails in the majority of cases (which is a fact), then the smart guy who
UNDERSTANDS all the underpinnings, is
losing more money than someone who does not have the patience, perseverance or even the intelligence to do so. So effectively we can prove that the person getting the best outcome is the person who has never even heard about Socrates and is NOT using it.
The computerized System of Smoke and Mirrors
While
trying to understand the system, you are lead to believe by its promoters, or by your own wishful thinking that the failure to make gains using it is caused by your own trading mistakes, and all it takes to make consistent profits is to eliminate the trading mistakes.
Learn more about the system, eliminate your mistakes and become profitable!That is a trap because of the following:
The system
has many conflicting signals. These are the smoke and mirrors. And which is the right one or the wrong one can only be said in hindsight.
There is no cherry picker that comes with the system that tells you in advance which will be the signal to pay attention to, the signal to choose in a particular market situation to make a trade.
It is as simple as that, and normally one should be finished at this point and move on with better things.The Martin Armstrong Sales Tactics Aspect
However,
Martin Armstrong definitely had different ideas. Many years ago, before his prison time, he believed in his own system. He hired some programmers to implement it for him, and traded using it. He traded using other people's money and destroyed himself financially. He created a USD 3 Billion Ponzi scheme to cover his losses and served 11 years jail time for the crime.
He had 11 years in jail to re-purpose and enhance that system with the aim to conceal its failures and sell it to users as a service. He is not really selling it as trading advice. See the Socrates fine print. He does everything he can to make you believe it is a trading tool while at the same time denying that he is selling one. Otherwise he would be in jail again.
Again, otherwise, if Socrates actually worked, he would just trade using it and not tell anyone about his profits.
No, Socrates can't do this for him so he has to let the shills
(including himself) create the smoke and mirrors.
We can see it in real time while I write this: He is using
the alias wobermey1987 to suggest to
use yet another set of signals:
Use the daily crash numbers and daily breakout numbers.
to delay the inevitable - :
that the Socrates subscriber loses confidence and quits (deleted by the "unaffiliated" moderator).
Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.
Read this blog
starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.
See
armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.
Every single defrauded person should report their case, see
Where and how to complain[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]