I feel like if all racers raced in the same cars, bottas and hamilton would have been waaay down from their places, definitely not last because they are still quite great racers, but 20-30% advantage is probably their cars. In any case my boy Lando Norris ended up 9th today, not a good race from him hopefully he will recover and brings it next race so he could keep his position.
I think we cannot judge them like that.If we do then Michael Schumacher except the two titles with Benetton the others with Ferrari would not count because Ferrari was the best car back then.Hamilton is another level and he demonstrated it the first year with McLaren that he lost the Championship just because of one point difference.
Just to correct you a bit m8, Schumi's Ferrari was not the best car on the grid from the get go and not all titles he won with Ferrari are clear cut best car on the grid scenario. Do some reading and learning and you will see what I mean.
So those two scenarios can't be compared as the same.
No need to correct me as I have been watching F1 since Senna times and the fact that Schumi hit the wall at Silverstone 1999 and broke his leg is only his fault and no one else.He would have won the title in 1999.Ferrari was at the same level if not a bit better than McLaren at those years.Then in year 2000 and above Ferrari was in another league just like Mercedes it is now.Schumi is a driver not well known for massive overtakings like Hamilton is and Senna was that is why his seven titles means nothing to me.Probably because I am an all time McLaren fan.