"Utopian"Future the community has voted that I should have my stake. Justice has prevailed! GIVE ME MY STAKE!
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5352912
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5352912
Work together to develop nem.
Topic: [NEM] NEM -New Economy Movement - No Envy Movement - Updates+Discussion thread - page 346. (Read 661499 times)
February 24, 2014, 11:45:54 PM
Work together to develop nem.
February 24, 2014, 11:41:58 PM
"Utopian"Future the community has voted that I should have my stake. Justice has prevailed! GIVE ME MY STAKE BACK!
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5352912
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5352912
February 24, 2014, 11:41:48 PM
Just a quick word about the dissolution of Mt. Gox:
With the end of Mt. Gox, the first era of bitcoin is over and now things will become more mature. The crypto world has been marked by greed and envy, and that has led to only pain and has hurt the whole community.
Let's make a new, better world with NEM.
With the end of Mt. Gox, the first era of bitcoin is over and now things will become more mature. The crypto world has been marked by greed and envy, and that has led to only pain and has hurt the whole community.
Let's make a new, better world with NEM.
@makoto, the second times I am touched by something you wrote. You have a thing for words. Thanks.
February 24, 2014, 11:34:00 PM
Just a quick word about the dissolution of Mt. Gox:
With the end of Mt. Gox, the first era of bitcoin is over and now things will become more mature. The crypto world has been marked by greed and envy, and that has led to only pain and has hurt the whole community.
Let's make a new, better world with NEM.
With the end of Mt. Gox, the first era of bitcoin is over and now things will become more mature. The crypto world has been marked by greed and envy, and that has led to only pain and has hurt the whole community.
Let's make a new, better world with NEM.
February 24, 2014, 11:27:58 PM
Shameless repost, we need community members to get involved for this to be great!
nemcoin.info
Current Versions are at:
http://oddape.co/AwkwardTheme/index1.9.8.html (black theme)
and
http://oddape.co/AwkwardTheme/index1.9.7.html (blue theme)
Google Docs:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gbp1rivOTFZvtBG0_rJabUyyKbDuZjMBx9jiifBJO0c/edit?usp=sharing (nemcoin.info proposal)
Please give me your input, I have appreciated all the suggestions so far! Do you like the black or blue theme? I prefer the blue theme as I think it is more welcoming, but the black theme would go well with ournem.com
This site is built on the bootstrap framework, so it is super optimized for fullscreen and mobile sizes (I will optimize it for tablets later, but it still looks ok there for now)
Also. an "updates" section will be the next thing I implement into the site.
I can use more pictures, etc for the website!!! If I use your images/graphics/pictures whatever in the final design, You will receive some NEM from me shortly after launch.
A great part of this website will be the “case study” (read all about it in the google docs).
Any merchant or charity or fellow stakeholder that wants to get involved please post at this thread:
http://nemcoin.userboard.net/t45-nemcoininfo
read the google docs for more info on how you can help, thanks!
nemcoin.info
Current Versions are at:
http://oddape.co/AwkwardTheme/index1.9.8.html (black theme)
and
http://oddape.co/AwkwardTheme/index1.9.7.html (blue theme)
Google Docs:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gbp1rivOTFZvtBG0_rJabUyyKbDuZjMBx9jiifBJO0c/edit?usp=sharing (nemcoin.info proposal)
Please give me your input, I have appreciated all the suggestions so far! Do you like the black or blue theme? I prefer the blue theme as I think it is more welcoming, but the black theme would go well with ournem.com
This site is built on the bootstrap framework, so it is super optimized for fullscreen and mobile sizes (I will optimize it for tablets later, but it still looks ok there for now)
Also. an "updates" section will be the next thing I implement into the site.
I can use more pictures, etc for the website!!! If I use your images/graphics/pictures whatever in the final design, You will receive some NEM from me shortly after launch.
A great part of this website will be the “case study” (read all about it in the google docs).
Any merchant or charity or fellow stakeholder that wants to get involved please post at this thread:
http://nemcoin.userboard.net/t45-nemcoininfo
read the google docs for more info on how you can help, thanks!
I love the blue theme, it gives an energetic feeling (like NEM
)! We are the NEW economy movement, while the black color seem a bit conservative.I love the blue theme too,
good job. up
February 24, 2014, 11:20:29 PM
Shameless repost, we need community members to get involved for this to be great!
nemcoin.info
Current Versions are at:
http://oddape.co/AwkwardTheme/index1.9.8.html (black theme)
and
http://oddape.co/AwkwardTheme/index1.9.7.html (blue theme)
Google Docs:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gbp1rivOTFZvtBG0_rJabUyyKbDuZjMBx9jiifBJO0c/edit?usp=sharing (nemcoin.info proposal)
Please give me your input, I have appreciated all the suggestions so far! Do you like the black or blue theme? I prefer the blue theme as I think it is more welcoming, but the black theme would go well with ournem.com
This site is built on the bootstrap framework, so it is super optimized for fullscreen and mobile sizes (I will optimize it for tablets later, but it still looks ok there for now)
Also. an "updates" section will be the next thing I implement into the site.
I can use more pictures, etc for the website!!! If I use your images/graphics/pictures whatever in the final design, You will receive some NEM from me shortly after launch.
A great part of this website will be the “case study” (read all about it in the google docs).
Any merchant or charity or fellow stakeholder that wants to get involved please post at this thread:
http://nemcoin.userboard.net/t45-nemcoininfo
read the google docs for more info on how you can help, thanks!
nemcoin.info
Current Versions are at:
http://oddape.co/AwkwardTheme/index1.9.8.html (black theme)
and
http://oddape.co/AwkwardTheme/index1.9.7.html (blue theme)
Google Docs:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gbp1rivOTFZvtBG0_rJabUyyKbDuZjMBx9jiifBJO0c/edit?usp=sharing (nemcoin.info proposal)
Please give me your input, I have appreciated all the suggestions so far! Do you like the black or blue theme? I prefer the blue theme as I think it is more welcoming, but the black theme would go well with ournem.com
This site is built on the bootstrap framework, so it is super optimized for fullscreen and mobile sizes (I will optimize it for tablets later, but it still looks ok there for now)
Also. an "updates" section will be the next thing I implement into the site.
I can use more pictures, etc for the website!!! If I use your images/graphics/pictures whatever in the final design, You will receive some NEM from me shortly after launch.
A great part of this website will be the “case study” (read all about it in the google docs).
Any merchant or charity or fellow stakeholder that wants to get involved please post at this thread:
http://nemcoin.userboard.net/t45-nemcoininfo
read the google docs for more info on how you can help, thanks!
I love the blue theme, it gives an energetic feeling (like NEM
)! We are the NEW economy movement, while the black color seems a bit conservative. February 24, 2014, 11:03:35 PM
Tomorrow we will all forget about this. It's in the past. Emotions are high at the moment, but it will all be in the past. So AAAple12, promote Nem as best you can.
February 24, 2014, 11:00:21 PM
Can AAAple12 perhaps buy a stake with the spot he used for the logo?
I do feel bad if he's been active the past month with NEM and is missing out due to a miscommunications.
There's nothing worse than missing out on a possibly big opportunity due to a miscommunication. I speak from experience.
If it was all due to a miscommunications, I think this is a sensible solution, if he's been following up on Nem and reading this thread everyday.
I do feel bad if he's been active the past month with NEM and is missing out due to a miscommunications.
There's nothing worse than missing out on a possibly big opportunity due to a miscommunication. I speak from experience.
If it was all due to a miscommunications, I think this is a sensible solution, if he's been following up on Nem and reading this thread everyday.
Well he could have his stake back just as Mr.2Kool4Skewl could have his stake back. I don't really like to take things from people. But it is sad that some people like to madly argue that some rules are baseless, trivial just because the rules are going against them.
Please, not to 2kool. If Nem becomes big, why should somebody who calls it a scam benefit from it. Sorry, didn't mean to bring him up and risk him reading and starting in again. At least AAAple12 seems to be interested in the Nem, and which is something very important, to be part of the Nem community and promote. 2kool does not fit that goal.
February 24, 2014, 10:55:43 PM
To clarify you were not being removed. You were never in because your post did not qualify the promotional condition of that page.
Yes it did satisfy the conditions. I was removed from the list. There was a 'y' next to my name, because I checked, hence the reason It's only now, with the final list, I have noticed my absence. Please don't make me come to the conclusion that you're a liar.
The condition was to make a logo and posted the logo in the post. It was no big deal but you blew it to the level of principle. And yet the rules were there including two parts 1. Make the logo; 2. Posted the logo in the post so everyone can see.
I have no problem with letting people passionate about NEM to join the cause even for nothing. So it is not about the level of contribution. But I think you want to accuse me that I did not make the second condition clear enough for everyone. And therefore it should not be valid.
Well it might be the case but the people who submited logo at similar times to you should have the best judgment about it. That is why I want to ask them if the rules were indeed not clear enough.
I am really struggling to understand this; what is it about posting a link to my logo (instead of posting it as an image) which breaks the rules you have written right there? How does what I did prevent everyone from seeing it?
I am going to continue asking: may I have my stake back? I believe the decision to remove it was founded on a baseless, strange TECHNICALITY which had no reason to be there. Furthermore, it was just not made obvious enough that these were your intentions.
Yes you have your stake back. I just want to remind you that while you are busy arguing for your self-righteousness, I am working 2 spread sheets of close to 3000 accounts with a lot of numbers. Mistakes are going to be made so be careful when you call someone a liar.
February 24, 2014, 10:49:59 PM
Can AAAple12 perhaps buy a stake with the spot he used for the logo?
I do feel bad if he's been active the past month with NEM and is missing out due to a miscommunications.
There's nothing worse than missing out on a possibly big opportunity due to a miscommunication. I speak from experience.
If it was all due to a miscommunications, I think this is a sensible solution, if he's been following up on Nem and reading this thread everyday.
I do feel bad if he's been active the past month with NEM and is missing out due to a miscommunications.
There's nothing worse than missing out on a possibly big opportunity due to a miscommunication. I speak from experience.
If it was all due to a miscommunications, I think this is a sensible solution, if he's been following up on Nem and reading this thread everyday.
Well he could have his stake back just as Mr.2Kool4Skewl could have his stake back. I don't really like to take things from people. But it is sad that some people like to madly argue that some rules are baseless, trivial just because the rules are going against them.
February 24, 2014, 10:39:22 PM
Can AAAple12 perhaps buy a stake with the spot he used for the logo?
I do feel bad if he's been active the past month with NEM and is missing out due to a miscommunication.
There's nothing worse than missing out on a possibly big opportunity due to a miscommunication. I speak from experience.
If it was all due to a miscommunication, I think this is a sensible solution, if he's been following up on Nem and reading this thread everyday.
I do feel bad if he's been active the past month with NEM and is missing out due to a miscommunication.
There's nothing worse than missing out on a possibly big opportunity due to a miscommunication. I speak from experience.
If it was all due to a miscommunication, I think this is a sensible solution, if he's been following up on Nem and reading this thread everyday.
February 24, 2014, 10:32:52 PM
I am really struggling to understand this; what is it about posting a link to my logo (instead of posting it as an image) which breaks the rules you have written right there? How does what I did prevent everyone from seeing it?
I am going to continue asking: may I have my stake back? I believe the decision to remove it was founded on a baseless, strange TECHNICALITY which had no reason to be there. Furthermore, it was just not made obvious enough that these were your intentions.
I am going to continue asking: may I have my stake back? I believe the decision to remove it was founded on a baseless, strange TECHNICALITY which had no reason to be there. Furthermore, it was just not made obvious enough that these were your intentions.
Honestly guy, I didn't like your attitude. I assumed your post was really short with just an imgur link. After closing this thread and then seeing your post, I see that you actually put forth some thought towards the coin. You made suggestions etc. I shouldn't have been so harsh, as you actually did try to contribute even it was more with your thoughts on the subject than your actual submission. I have no more say than anyone else, but you should give him the stake, Utopianfuture.
February 24, 2014, 10:29:10 PM
To clarify you were not being removed. You were never in because your post did not qualify the promotional condition of that page.
Yes it did satisfy the conditions. I was removed from the list. There was a 'y' next to my name, because I checked, hence the reason It's only now, with the final list, I have noticed my absence. Please don't make me come to the conclusion that you're a liar.
The condition was to make a logo and posted the logo in the post. It was no big deal but you blew it to the level of principle. And yet the rules were there including two parts 1. Make the logo; 2. Posted the logo in the post so everyone can see.
I have no problem with letting people passionate about NEM to join the cause even for nothing. So it is not about the level of contribution. But I think you want to accuse me that I did not make the second condition clear enough for everyone. And therefore it should not be valid.
Well it might be the case but the people who submited logo at similar times to you should have the best judgment about it. That is why I want to ask them if the rules were indeed not clear enough.
In my view, the rules were clear for all people who paid attention and I did make some extra efforts to remind everyone so at that time. But I could be subjective so let's wait for someone else who joined in by promotion at that time to chime in.
Here are people who submitted logo from page 20 to page 30 which should face an exact promotional condition as you had. Everyone of them posted the logo directly in the post.
HalfEvil, upekha, adobkin88, jango, serpico-cop, nemestomen, hachiko, fz0591, kakoy-soobshaete, sepi, HissFast12, lewiscoin, Hovan, lostisland, AmusedClam84, RusticChinchilla8, cryptocoin12, Picasso7, Harry_Potter, HungryLaunch, Denis_Diderot, atias, Appleanimal, suka, balalaika, ShawnLeary, overseas3, HalfArsedElectron, CheerupSmug14.
I want to see some of them telling me if the rule about posting the logo directly in the post was clear enough.
February 24, 2014, 10:22:57 PM
To clarify you were not being removed. You were never in because your post did not qualify the promotional condition of that page.
Yes it did satisfy the conditions. I was removed from the list. There was a 'y' next to my name, because I checked, hence the reason It's only now, with the final list, I have noticed my absence. Please don't make me come to the conclusion that you're a liar.
The condition was to make a logo and posted the logo in the post. It was no big deal but you blew it to the level of principle. And yet the rules were there including two parts 1. Make the logo; 2. Posted the logo in the post so everyone can see.
I have no problem with letting people passionate about NEM to join the cause even for nothing. So it is not about the level of contribution. But I think you want to accuse me that I did not make the second condition clear enough for everyone. And therefore it should not be valid.
Well it might be the case but the people who submited logo at similar times to you should have the best judgment about it. That is why I want to ask them if the rules were indeed not clear enough.
I am really struggling to understand this; what is it about posting a link to my logo (instead of posting it as an image) which breaks the rules you have written right there? How does what I did prevent everyone from seeing it?
I am going to continue asking: may I have my stake back? I believe the decision to remove it was founded on a baseless, strange TECHNICALITY which had no reason to be there. Furthermore, it was just not made obvious enough that these were your intentions.
February 24, 2014, 10:20:56 PM
Once again, I can completely rip apart your response. I haven't had a single explanation from anyone yet that makes sense. It's like everyone just obeys and sides with Utopian's decisions like sheep, even if their arguments make no sense.
You can't start criticising one method of achieving a stake against another. I simply used one of a variety of methods detailed in the original post to claim a stake. Saying one method is superior to another lacks any kind of argumentative strength.
The only reason I had my stake REMOVED (not simply not added, but removed after being accepted for weeks!) was because it was linked to Imgur and not displayed right in the post. I regret making the decision to make my post look tidier now. And, for the thousandth time, it's quality is your opinion and is NOT an issue here.
You obviously were not REALLY trying and cared not one bit but cheap way to get a stake.
You can't start criticising one method of achieving a stake against another. I simply used one of a variety of methods detailed in the original post to claim a stake. Saying one method is superior to another lacks any kind of argumentative strength.
Quote
It was pretty simple. If you'd shown a real attempt and not a bs logo, maybe people would be sympathetic.
The only reason I had my stake REMOVED (not simply not added, but removed after being accepted for weeks!) was because it was linked to Imgur and not displayed right in the post. I regret making the decision to make my post look tidier now. And, for the thousandth time, it's quality is your opinion and is NOT an issue here.
Single click of mouse does not mean it cleanly loads with a single picture. You didn't care if anyone could easily see it. You put 10x more effort into this argument than you did your stupid logo.
You missed the boat where it was all free. You had to put forth effort. Your design lacks any real evidence of effort. I could get 5 of those made on fiverr for $5. That is reality. I would argue you didn't put forth even minimal effort initially, but it was hard to judge since you didn't post it on the page like others. You expect others to go to external site look around to find your attempt that wasn't even true. Give me a break.
February 24, 2014, 10:11:11 PM
I see there's certainly no lack of drama going on here the last couple days. Anyway, is there some formal list of items us non-programmers can contribute to?
February 24, 2014, 10:09:58 PM
To clarify you were not being removed. You were never in because your post did not qualify the promotional condition of that page.
Yes it did satisfy the conditions. I was removed from the list. There was a 'y' next to my name, because I checked, hence the reason It's only now, with the final list, I have noticed my absence. Please don't make me come to the conclusion that you're a liar.
The condition was to make a logo and posted the logo in the post. It was no big deal but you blew it to the level of principle. And yet the rules were there including two parts 1. Make the logo; 2. Posted the logo in the post so everyone can see.
I have no problem with letting people passionate about NEM to join the cause even for nothing. So it is not about the level of contribution. But I think you want to accuse me that I did not make the second condition clear enough for everyone. And therefore it should not be valid.
Well it might be the case but the people who submited logo at similar times to you should have the best judgment about it. That is why I want to ask them if the rules were indeed not clear enough.
In my view, the rules were clear for all people who paid attention and I did make some extra efforts to remind everyone so at that time. But I could be subjective so let's wait for someone else who joined in by promotion at that time to chime in.
February 24, 2014, 10:00:56 PM
Wow, this has boiled over...
I feel like this will be an unpopular opinion, but I do have sympathy for AAAple. I also feel slightly perplexed as to the reasoning behind his/her removal from the stakeholder list. (S)he posted a logo AND made the effort to describe what it should be like.
I may not know the full story, but it seems a bit harsh to go out of your way to remove his/her stake? I'm saying nothing about the quality of the logo, but I've seen a lot of other logos just as 'bad'.
That's just my two cents on the matter.
I feel like this will be an unpopular opinion, but I do have sympathy for AAAple. I also feel slightly perplexed as to the reasoning behind his/her removal from the stakeholder list. (S)he posted a logo AND made the effort to describe what it should be like.
I may not know the full story, but it seems a bit harsh to go out of your way to remove his/her stake? I'm saying nothing about the quality of the logo, but I've seen a lot of other logos just as 'bad'.
That's just my two cents on the matter.
Thank you for your support. You seem to be the only person to agree with my point of view here.
February 24, 2014, 09:57:27 PM
To clarify you were not being removed. You were never in because your post did not qualify the promotional condition of that page.
Yes it did satisfy the conditions. I was removed from the list. There was a 'y' next to my name, because I checked, hence the reason It's only now, with the final list, I have noticed my absence. Please don't make me come to the conclusion that you're a liar.
February 24, 2014, 09:55:31 PM
Isn't there a complaints thread for these issues? I am annoyed that the topic of discussion on this board is being disrupted by the issues of one person. If you have a complaint go through the proper channels. Please do not force EVERY member of this thread to sit through the resolution of YOUR ONE issue. That is not what this is for. This is the stake complaints thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nem-nem-stake-complaint-questions-etc-450200
No one was responding adequately there. I also thought it was so stupidly outrageous that the whole community should know. But apparently you, and everyone else, don't care that someone has had their stake taken from them, so long as you have yours. You just want to push us away to argue somewhere where you can't see us. You obviously don't care about me, so why should I care about you? If my issue was resolved appropriately then none of this would have happened.
Also, 'MY ONE issue' happens to be my stake being removed for no reason; nothing trivial. I want answers.
Unfortunately I very much doubt my 'issue' will be resolved. Stubbornness is a disappointingly common trait.
Its not that I don't care, I just think that putting this issue on blast in the wrong location isn't exactly helping your argument.
Jump to: