Topic: Nevra (XEV) - Project is Terminated - page 32. (Read 11619 times)

Nice project. I've read through almost the whole thread now, good to come across something else on this board then threads with "joined airdrop" "when bittrex".
There is actual discussion going on here, it's the start of a community. Going to be watching this one!

Voted for increasing the supply by the way.

I think that additional verification will not very effective, but it is better than nothing. To be honest I can not imagine how it is posible to verify 1000 accounts, it is titanic job. For example verification through Telegram account will not the big proble for few alts, but if you have 20 - 30 alts it could be problem.

I like the concept of this project, it means humble members like me can be treated the same as more senior members.
I have two questions though:

1. why do you limit the participant to be 1000, instead of letting more people share the pie?
2. I strongly support the idea of equality, however I think there is still a chance that whales can get a lot of shares.
    For example, someone can already used their bot accounts to have developed multiple senior accounts before the merit system is introduced to the forum, now if they like this project, they can jump in and use all their alts to reply here and get a share. One project I participated before obviously had this issue and it made everyone who just have one normal account's share significantly diluted....

Just my two cents, I think the bitcointalk reply can be combined with some other method, a twitter/facebook/telegram to distinguish the real person.

I will follow your project, good luck~

checked out the website. Great work. The project moves ahead.

I would like to reserve the Spanish translation. Please let me know.

I'm thrilled to discover such an innovative approach regarding token holders and the business model around creating of a strong community behind and backing the project first, than using nowadays approach of giveaways which, to me, creates unequality, is prone to speculation, creates disinterest from the community if prices aren't high... where people interested in money only are well served inspite of serving the project properly and getting behind it. Specially with loads of projects in the mix, most people are investing their money very short term expecting probably 10x return without even considering the foundation, the team, the project, the vision behind it etc... Putting the community first and at the centre of your project so as to create a strong bond where the community and the foundation can stay in touch is, for me, the best possible model going forward (You're not giving your money to some unknown folks out there, with whom you can't get in touch,  just because their project seems very promising and the hype is skying, right??)
I firmly believe that blockchain projects will stand long term mostly due to the community behind it. 80% tokens for the community equally shared around high values as freedom and trust is just a concept i thought i'd never came across in this capitalist world.
I am a big fan of infrastructure projects, the foundation of our tomorrow blockchain centered world, and i'm keen to go through your technical whitepaper. Anyway i'll be following you closely in the next couple of months and I'm sure you guys haven't finished to surprise us all.
Also, i haven't read your directive TK808, with all these holders and potentially the founder having only 3%, how is your Board going to operate, will it be with independent advisory, community involved ...?
Good luck with this and long live your concept, you've got my TRUST.

The project has a good concept, the key thing will be how the team promote it, I suggest some bounties using some kind of contest when the community contribute with new ideas and the best idea will recieve a reward for example... Continue with your goals!! 

Those who unfortunately don't have technical skills, I think it is quite fair if they simply help keeping this thread alive with relevant and useful comments. If one cares about the community, surely there will be time and way to give the best of themselves even after that the airdrop is done. Keep up the good work to all of you!

dont wait, contribution needed, give what you can to build a community, and I'm happy if this community bigger even if I'm just a supporter

respectfully disagree to the above statement but only to a degree, if you check the project's whitepaper you will notice that the base foundations of  Nevra is equality, meaning all persons are treated equality regardless of skills or contribution, however the project tokens allocation does recognize major contributions such the project founder, developers  and even above and beyond actions contributing to the overall success of the project hence my statement "only to a degree". for the remaining members that do not have any of those qualities the only contribution that they can offer in my humble opinion is proof of promotion, a thing that the project is not pushing for at the moment although its time will come. I might be wrong as this is only my point of view. 
Note: if by contribution you meant activity then we are in the same page 
thank you!

The rules for becoming a NevraStake holder are quite reasonable methods.
I think the project will achieve a great success!

I can see your point,  mate.  But admin already explained this to me.  They are still into equality.  They just want to see who are the real (human)  supporters of the project and they don't want someone who's using multiple accounts be benefited.  That's no longer equal if that happened.

The core of the project is equality, freedom and trust. Behind the good ideals, don't go into a misunderstanding and become utopian.
Because each person's ability is not the same, can not be equal, I prefer to see based on individual contribution to the project to determine Distribution XEV, to achieve a relatively fair. Hope DEV can pay attention to this problem

too bad you will not get anything if you said something like this,
read the OP for more information about 'how to join the airdrop'.

I do not have much knowledge about the blockchain technology. I do not have a technical background. I'm a law student. But I feel that XEV will have a good future and would like to join the NEVRA.

Glad you are not taking this KYC approach, I still feel bad for sending mine to Polymath. Never again.

I think to develop into a good project, at least should have the following conditions:

To develop a loyal and active community is the most important issue so far. Letting all people think this is a long-term investment project,

Get Distribution XEV object is active users is correct, the more active the proportion of users should get higher, according to the contribution of Distribution

DEV efforts are still essential, continuous technological innovation, hard work, will make more and more investors to join, need to do a long-term planning, and constant efforts Strength, looking forward to your Roadmap.

During the project development, no matter how much the XEV price, DEV should work hard to carry out development work,This is really very important

Glad to see that we have 20 pages in the thread. But I have surprised that whales of bitcointalk.ord still does not here.

Good day, what news do you have here?

Honestly, I like that you are attempting to go about your airdrop process in a different manner to everyone else. (Its creative and innovative and refreshing really.)

But after the 3round review process - what is it that will make your project be worth the effort of your community's participation... Scarcity maybe? Nope, the thought that this is a coin more a f-u to all those out to make a quick buck and instead show that we are wanting to stand up to create a fairer more transparent process... well that's actually just a great way of thinking. Bravo.

I like that you are recording the stakeholders and those currently 'flagged'. At least you are giving them time to sort that out.