Topic: [NLG] The even greater Gulden thread! - page 5. (Read 47213 times)

Witnessing was finished long ago but Witnessing sync was only half done before the devs had to do Florin work.

Was the witness project ever finished?

A name change to Munt is a healthy change, if crypto was invented 30 years ago Gulden was a great name but times have moved on. Munt is a more inclusive name even within the population of NL with no historical emotions attached.
Nice move Gulden team. I have been highly critical of past choices but this is a positive one.

I liquidated all my crypto assets when the FED raised rates, waiting for the cycle to peak before I jump back in.

The Gulden name attracted WAYYY too many boomers living a dream of a return to the guilder. I support the move to a new coin name and plan to invest when the time is right.

Time to bring in the dutch youth to crypto, they are the future of NL.

??
How do you kill something twice?

Finally this shit coin will be dead Oct 3 2022

Neither coin will fail. They will grow in tandem, very gradually, then perhaps will really exponentiate more rapidly down the line.

Florin failure will be good for Gulden. Development has slowed because of 2 coins. When is witness sync going to release?

Has Florin failed? Where are the investors Rijk kept talking about?

Many exchanges with native tokens will eventually rugpull just like NCKS. Ridiculously high listing fees will hopefully be a thing of the past due to regulatory oversight and the need to onboard lasting projects with growth potential and new liquidity. Not a whole lot of people used Nocks even in its hey-day but in the event of incremental awareness amounting to new use cases for Gulden and Florin, coins that get "greenlit" on the other side of this regulation-driven bear market will act like money vacuums because of high growth potential due to undervaluation per its comparative supply to other projects that have had more pre-regulation hype.

Nocks was the glory days of Gulden but I didn't like it when they added Nocks token.

It was the beginning of the 2022 when bitcoinmeester stopped support due to volume and price spread issues which triggered the bearish trend.

Pretty much all the sell pressure since then has been suuuper low volume bottom dumping due to the broader market crash. Lack of buyer liquidity and interest; the need for use case adoption and low market visibility are the main bearish issues specifically affecting Gulden for the past 4+ years now despite the good fundamental developments, updates and fixes that have occurred.

 NLG definitely needs some new broker services like bitcoinmeester and more general awareness to get back on track. NLG is still available on bittrex.com, abra and stex.com, you can also buy directly from blockhut.com which directly supports the ongoing development which remains uninterrupted since april 2014, over 8 years ago.

When was the Guilder removed from bitcoinmeester? I wanted to buy coins at this price.

More exaggeration and hyperbole. Your figures are erroneous. The premine was spent a long long time ago.

Supply was drastically reduced right as the local top was being put in last spring.

Price action since then has acted as a reset, in a way. So, Gulden is already many months into a new cycle and the bottom is already being put in. Whereas the broader sector is about to go down the same percentage that gulden has already posted.

 Gulden in this way is actually ahead of the curve in terms of where the rest of the sector, including btc, is going.

Gulden's comparatively modest goal of gaining acceptance as a "checkmark" crypto (regulation-compatible) in the Netherlands as a means of payment and a limited issuance digital store of value and growing out from there is now a much more *realistic* and practical goal than all the dumb irrational exuberance hype we heard for over a decade about rendering banks obsolete entirely with btc and a handful of other POW/POS coins like Ether (which had, in effect nearly a 70% pre-mine with the DAO hack code makeover but it still ran up on the coat tails of the same "global alternative to everything" thesis that drove btc).
That "new global payment system" thesis is now getting obliterated. Less than 2% of people even use or hold ANY crypto. With this kind of ongoing volatility in btc, the global adoption btc-maxi narrative is getting its goose cooked right now.

 The reason why it will still take time (probably a few years still) for the Gulden philosophy of blockchain to start to really catch on is that all the ambition, equity, bloated infrastructure  and perma-bullish confidence in the fake promises of btc being a hedge against inflation and the end-all-be-all way to oust the banks is being completely negated right now so investor sentiment has been pummeled as a result.

Thus, Gulden and Florin represent a truly next generation iteration with updated advantages that blockchain and crypto still bring to the table when it comes to a new financial sector.

Again, before this next generation offering starts scaling the real adoption ladder, all the air has to still be let out of the hype-inflated balloon. Gulden (which has good blockchain fundamentals) has functioned for many years on a highly conservative budget which also gives it staying power vs these other way over-evaluated balloon projects which will giveup and fold much faster due to the quick comparative lack of liquidity.

Only the truly resilient projects that can operate at shoestring capacity will survive this phase of regulatory crackdowns. All the hype exchanges could be shutdown and that actually would not negatively effect the functioning status of gulden. Many of these coins only exist because of their wash trading exchange activity because they are just copypasta tokens of ETH, etc. and don't have their own blockchains.

The reality is that gulden needs some kind of an ambassador program that can influence the thinking surrounding legislation around blockchain in the netherlands with NLG and XFL as secure offerings that can receive the increasingly inevitable nterbank/intergovernmental nod of approval.

If Ripple gets that nod in the US, Gulden will most likely gain traction in the Netherlands in a similar way.

Blockhut is a one dimensional service, it's only purpose is to sell the dev reward and premine. Will the entire 100 million be placed on blockhut? This means there will be no reason to buy more coins on the exchanges for new users.

Gulden and florin have the same problem of buyers not affecting the exchange rate because its coming off blockhut that only sells the dev reward, when it runs out users have to wait instead of blockhut buying off bittrex for users which would increase the price.