Topic: Not all new project team can afford top exchanges (Read 1706 times)

There are many problems with it. Major exchanges are having incubators for these projects. Even there are some really good ones, exchanges are just not looking for the good tokens, cause in the incubator they can affect it and have higher profit - cut bigger part of coins. If you don't have luck, try to make your project better or add something in it. Else you have to satisfy with smaller exchanges where will your token less chance for adoption.

Best thing is if you have a decent project then i think building it and maintaining devs is a top priority once you start gaining strength then go for Binance that will make you gain investors trust in my opinion

if this new project have good quality , i think listing in binance will not be trouble for them. binance not always talk about fee to list good project, they prefer to filtered by their self and create voting in community voting so project that choosed was supported by large community.

It's difficult for all new project to listed on top exchange due to they need their raised fund to develop their project. But if new projects are launched by exchanges like yobit, p2pb2b,, then no doubt those are come to market for scam.

Any project with good and innovative idea's will be listing on top exchange free of charge. Binance has done this several times with good projects and if any good projects approach their exchange they do accordingly. Also, Hoo exchange list without fee if the said projects seem good or full of potentials, but those projects with speculatives potentials won't be allow in their listing on those exchanges. Moreover, many projects will raised funds  that is up to list on top exchange but won't take the advantage.

"Not being able to afford" is literally one of the causes of not being a good project. You do not need to be a rich team to end up rich, if you are a good team, if you have good developers, if you have good designers, if you have a good marketing team, you will end up making a good profit as well, if you fail to do any of that you will not have a lot of money.

That means if you do not have a good team, maybe you should not do a project neither, people act like everyone has a right to start a new project, its not a "must", you guys know that right? If you can't, just don't. Don't start with 100 dollars and zero coding experience and just ask people around and make a fake silly coin. However if you are legit good, you will be capable of actually putting money into it and afford top exchanges.

This is not really true at all as it basically boils down to who can spend the most to secure the votes needed to win. It’s not a level playing field at all even though it might seem like one.

I think your list should subtract Probit, because their liquidity is very low, and not reliable to trade. Hoo is a notable new exchange recently when they listed low-cap or mid-cap projects but very potential, and really good liquidity.

You are right Affording big money in start to conduct IEO on big exchanges is not possible for new projects but below are few options as I have observed many new project IEO succeeded on these good reputation exchanges.
1. Hoo.exchange
2. Probit exchange
3. Upbit

Good a thing that the Era of Initial coin offering came and ended, it's after math became what people didn't want to reckon with,scam and all the rest. Now the era of initial exchange Offering came ,it rejuvenated and gave hope again, but now the problem is with some project not being able to pay up for top notch exchanges, well there are still some medium scale exchanges that could help in fund raising,the likes of probit and hoo . I think these are the two I know for now.

Binance conducts monthly voting for the right to list on the exchange. Similar votes are also held on other exchanges. Therefore, if the project is really high-quality and it has an established community, then they have a real chance to get a listing even on such a top exchange as Binance.

hoo exchange place in my opinion is still classified as a new exchange place, do you know that there are some exchange places that have an exchange place program and currently an exchange place that has an IEO program becomes a scam, remain vigilant when wanting to participate in IEO and make sure to participate in a place of exchange that has a good and trusted reputation.

This problem is not just related to new projects but for existing projects too. Exchanges are a blight on the industry and the fees they think are reasonable are anything but. I have personally seen listing fees of over $1M plus wanting 10% of the coins supply it’s absolute madness. Prior to 2017 listing fees were pretty reasonable but once the ICO age hit they got extremely greedy and started charging huge fees because all these ICO projects were sat on millions of $’s so they spent massive amounts of their budgets on them. Those days are done yet exchanges haven’t got the message so are trying to find new ways to extract massive amounts of cash from projects which seems to be these IEO’s now. They don’t care about the fundamentals of a project in most cases they only care about what makes them a nice pot of cash.

For existing projects that are trying to do things properly, that didn’t have an ICO or any of that rubbish it puts them in a awkward position. Do they blown their entire budget just to secure one big exchange listing or do they use that money towards development? You would think that some people would see the nobility in a project trying to do things the proper way, the way crypto was started, through hard work and delivering products but nope that’s not the case at all. These exchanges have brainwashed people into thinking if it’s not listed there then it’s a shitcoin scam and must be avoided yet probably 90% of the projects they list have absolutely no working products. It’s sad to see how far the industry has moved away from the ideals it was built on.

They can always go back to basic of ICOs however this is a hard way for now. As you can see this method has been hate by most investors and traders now, due to a lot of scammed projects that had happened in the past by this. But I dont think ICOs are just bad, but we can rarely see a project that will be succesful now on ICOs. The analogy of IEO is good but honest to goodness only projects with money can join top markets for this. Yes they can, but as you explained it maybe you are right, insisiting on listed IEO on low exchanges only resulted to worse one.

If they haven't planned the listing of the project I think the team shouldn't start asking for funds.

It's never going to happen anyway, top exchanges becomes top exchanges because they have good reputations and that's something they don't want to ruin by taking in new projects that aren't reliable, once they do mistake once or twice they are going down.

Indeed, IEO is already considered bad for investors because the results are no longer appropriate, many garbage projects that only want to get funding and run away do not take care of their projects anymore. But to solve this problem, actually, the only exchange that made this IEO even more professional was to filter the seeds of new project seeds that really had quality, not just for fundraising. There are still many markets now that hold IEO and many are successful as I always follow, namely Hoo Exchange, providing good profits for traders there. So hopefully investors still want to glance at IEO again at this time.

Well, the problem with registering on popular exchanges is that the price is very expensive. in fact, some of the regulations may be strict enough that the tokens you put in there can be delisted at any time when you violate them. Well, however, the popular exchange is not suitable for projects that want to develop half-measures.
in fact, if a project strives for it, I think all projects have their own opportunities.

l do agree with your view on that, most investors prefer to take part in the IEO, that is why they think IEO is safer than ICO. They are tired of ICO scam projects. Maybe that is the reason for preferring IEO so a lot. That doesn't mean there is not any bad project of IEO, but much better than ICO. That is absolutely right to use the trusted Escrow service can be the best choice, because there is just a little thing in which we can avoid our money from scammers.

The growing popularity of IEO makes many new exchangers who do IEO and this in my opinion requires caution. Large exchangers will certainly carry out rigorous verification of projects that are listed, while small exchangers sometimes do IEO too often so that they seem just to get a fee