And what you are illustrating is a hunger in the market for the authentic currency with privacy intact.
I don't think the dropping of the mask had anything to do with loss of credibility, in fact I don't perceive any loss in credibility whatsoever.
Just the opposite is true, the devs showed that they don't need to hide behind a marketing gimmick.
As for, "looking to cash in quickly on a fool's grail," I call bullshit. There is no activity at all toward pump and dump.
Either you have an agenda, have no clue, or are just plain stupid.
You raise 3 points, not one of which is valid.
1) Yes there is interest obviously in coins with anonymity. Nobody doubts that. So what point are you making? You are saying "there is an interest in privacy coins, therefore anoncoin is justified in..." what? Making that its only focus?
2) You don't perceive a loss in credibility of anoncoin? You think the devs gained credibility by not hiding behind a 'marketing gimmick'? Please. They considered the anon mask a liability, thought they might have broader appeal without it. Instead all they did was remove the one thing that distinguished the coin from dozens of others. They miscalculated.
3) Again you are distorting the argument in order to seem to win. The mask etc was dropped to help the coin gain popularity. It backfired. Now anc is losing ground. There is no longer anything that sets it above other coins. Whichever anonymous coin is the first to start looking at the global picture will succeed. At this point there is no indication that anc devs have any interest beyond "becoming the most anonymous coin", an endless pursuit.
Can you, or anyone, clarify the goals of anc devs? They dropped their one small globally recognized statement/symbol. Meeh is working with another dev on something that might or might not be useful, but which a truly anonymous coin should not need. Does anoncoin have any intentions or objectives different than the mass of other privacy coins?
Now of course you will say " the other ones are mostly scams, anoncoin is not" blah blah blah In other words there is no difference right now between anoncoin and lots of other coins except anc has taken steps to try to appeal to more people by softening any sharp edges it may have once had, in your words it dropped the "marketing gimmick". Is that right?
Hi Luigi, I can't clarify what the goals of the developers are, but I see this somewhat differently than you do. To me, Anoncoin is way more hardcore and serious than "Anonymous". Though anonymous does some cool stuff from time to time, there is a lot of immaturity in the group as a whole. Anoncoin actually is proposing a solution to combat the hegemony of the central banks, whereas all that Anonymous has done is to hack their web pages. I am all for freedom of information, so I welcome the attacks that Anonymous has organized, even though they have not really achieved much in the end.
Based on everything the developers have done, it is clear that they have some sympathy with the goals of "anonymous", but that they are also not conforming to the group mentality and stereotypes. If Anoncoin were to define itself only by a logo (i.e., Guy Fawkes mask), that would be pretty sad.
In any case, I agree that there should be some reference to the political leanings of Anoncoin on the new web site. Though not explicit on the current web site, it is implicit. I am working with n00n on this as we speak to make this more explicit, so concrete proposals for the text of the new site would be welcome.
Again, I also disagree with your analysis of pursuit of anonymity. To me, this pursuit is not endless. There is a goal to become anonymous. No coin has achieved anonymity yet, as it makes no sense to be X% anonymous. With Zerocoin and I2P (baring bugs in the code) anoncoin would be truly anonymous.