Pages:
Author

Topic: Open Source XPM (Primecoin) GPU Miner & Pool xpmforall.org - page 28. (Read 110186 times)

newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
Hi, I have a problem with the GTX1060.
I have 2 R9 390 and 3 GTX 1060. The 2 R9 have all "Sher accepted", the gtx 1060 have continually "Invalid Share".

the Nvidia configuration file is this:
# Pool websites:
#   http://xpmforall.org
#   http://coinsforall.io

server = "xpmforall.org";
port = "6666";

# Your XPM payout address
address = "My addrss";

# You can give this machine a custom name
# Computer name is used as default
#name = "Nvidia";

# Platform:
#  "amd": AMD GCN cards
#  "amd legacy": AMD HD5xxx & HD6xxx cards
#  "nvidia": NVidia Maxwell cards
platform = "nvidia";

# GPU crash handling (properly untested feature):
# 0 - do nothing
# 1 - close miner application
# 2 - reboot system (need superuser rights)
onCrash = "0";

# - Valid cpuload range: 0 to 4
# - More than 2 does not make sense
# - You can use 0 for really slow CPUs
cpuload = "0";

# Target Cunningham chain length, default = 10
target = "10";

# Sieve size in stripes (1 stripe = 16384 bits), recommended 420 for AMD, 210 for NVidia
# Big sieve size gives more candidates with less prime probability
sieveSize = "420";

# Weave depth (primes number count using by sieve), recommended 40960 for AMD, 65536 for NVidia
# Big weave depth increases prime probability, but sieve generate less candidates
weaveDepth = "65536";

# Sieve layers number, optimal value is target*2, default = 20
width = "20";

# Sieve window size. Recommended values:
# AMD GPUs: 4096
# NVidia GeForce 750Ti: 8188
# Other NVidia Maxwell GPUs: 12284
windowSize = "12284";

# - The following settings have one entry per GPU
# - If you have more than 4 just add more entries or leave it as is to use defaults
# - All entries must be separated by commas and set between double quotes

# 0 = don't use device
# 1 = use device
devices =        ["1", "1", "1", "1", "1"];

# Primorial 13 is optimal
sieveprimorial = ["13", "13", "13", "13", "13"];

# sieves per round value, default = 5
sievePerRound = ["5", "5", "5", "5", "5"];

# -1 means don't change
corefreq =       ["-1", "-1", "-1", "-1", "-1"];
memfreq =        ["-1", "-1", "-1", "-1", "-1"];
powertune =      ["-1", "-1", "-1", "-1", "-1"];
fanspeed =       ["-1", "-1", "-1", "-1", "-1"];


If I put "sieveSize = "210";", the program closes automatically.

Why my GTX have all these "invalid shares" Huh??



Same for me with a GTX 1070 Ti
jr. member
Activity: 117
Merit: 2
Some people here talk about special kernels. I have good CPD on my Radeon cards, but how did some people get over 0.5 CPD per RX 580? I get 0.42 max.
Any suggestion are very much appreciated Smiley

how much appreciated?
jr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 4
Some people here talk about special kernels. I have good CPD on my Radeon cards, but how did some people get over 0.5 CPD per RX 580? I get 0.42 max.
Any suggestion are very much appreciated Smiley
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
Hi, I have a problem with the GTX1060.
I have 2 R9 390 and 3 GTX 1060. The 2 R9 have all "Sher accepted", the gtx 1060 have continually "Invalid Share".

the Nvidia configuration file is this:
# Pool websites:
#   http://xpmforall.org
#   http://coinsforall.io

server = "xpmforall.org";
port = "6666";

# Your XPM payout address
address = "My addrss";

# You can give this machine a custom name
# Computer name is used as default
#name = "Nvidia";

# Platform:
#  "amd": AMD GCN cards
#  "amd legacy": AMD HD5xxx & HD6xxx cards
#  "nvidia": NVidia Maxwell cards
platform = "nvidia";

# GPU crash handling (properly untested feature):
# 0 - do nothing
# 1 - close miner application
# 2 - reboot system (need superuser rights)
onCrash = "0";

# - Valid cpuload range: 0 to 4
# - More than 2 does not make sense
# - You can use 0 for really slow CPUs
cpuload = "0";

# Target Cunningham chain length, default = 10
target = "10";

# Sieve size in stripes (1 stripe = 16384 bits), recommended 420 for AMD, 210 for NVidia
# Big sieve size gives more candidates with less prime probability
sieveSize = "420";

# Weave depth (primes number count using by sieve), recommended 40960 for AMD, 65536 for NVidia
# Big weave depth increases prime probability, but sieve generate less candidates
weaveDepth = "65536";

# Sieve layers number, optimal value is target*2, default = 20
width = "20";

# Sieve window size. Recommended values:
# AMD GPUs: 4096
# NVidia GeForce 750Ti: 8188
# Other NVidia Maxwell GPUs: 12284
windowSize = "12284";

# - The following settings have one entry per GPU
# - If you have more than 4 just add more entries or leave it as is to use defaults
# - All entries must be separated by commas and set between double quotes

# 0 = don't use device
# 1 = use device
devices =        ["1", "1", "1", "1", "1"];

# Primorial 13 is optimal
sieveprimorial = ["13", "13", "13", "13", "13"];

# sieves per round value, default = 5
sievePerRound = ["5", "5", "5", "5", "5"];

# -1 means don't change
corefreq =       ["-1", "-1", "-1", "-1", "-1"];
memfreq =        ["-1", "-1", "-1", "-1", "-1"];
powertune =      ["-1", "-1", "-1", "-1", "-1"];
fanspeed =       ["-1", "-1", "-1", "-1", "-1"];


If I put "sieveSize = "210";", the program closes automatically.

Why my GTX have all these "invalid shares" Huh??

full member
Activity: 237
Merit: 100
the video cards are the same. changes only miner and difficulty.  Smiley



ps current CPD 0.70-0.75. constantly changing.
jr. member
Activity: 117
Merit: 2
Quote
18.3.3 compute mode == blockchain driver == good result 0.42 CPD for RX 580 1250 MHz

you can do better, much better.
your compiled kernel is too big, it should be around 1193KB for better results.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
good kernel
you're talking about amdocl.* ?

of course. not every driver is good for every cards.
if you compile kernel on wrong drivers you will got bad results.
you can see my results in some older posts.

18.3.3 compute mode == blockchain driver == good result 0.42 CPD for RX 580 1250 MHz
jr. member
Activity: 117
Merit: 2
good kernel
you're talking about amdocl.* ?

of course. not every driver is good for every cards.
if you compile kernel on wrong drivers you will got bad results.
you can see my results in some older posts.
sr. member
Activity: 479
Merit: 250
wtf does that mean

also there is more than 1 pool and who said you needed to use a pool?
full member
Activity: 237
Merit: 100
dont know why you newbs keep talking about daily profits thats not how you calc profits unless you are dumping daily then thats silly. this coin is 1 of the oldest yet its the best also i think you forget that its reward changes on every diff change this is not like any other

forgive .... Your words make you doubt ... That you know a few more coins.  Smiley What is the best?  Smiley Besides that she has the only pool.  Grin
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
sr. member
Activity: 479
Merit: 250
dont know why you newbs keep talking about daily profits thats not how you calc profits unless you are dumping daily then thats silly. this coin is 1 of the oldest yet its the best also i think you forget that its reward changes on every diff change this is not like any other


jr. member
Activity: 117
Merit: 2
Anybody tested hashrate of R9 290x/390x on XPM with 10.2.2 tweaked miner ? May be ~0.54 CPD ?

maybe with 9.4.1 and good kernel/driver.
it should be few % faster than 10.x.x
full member
Activity: 237
Merit: 100
at difficulty 12 good GPU's will be producing a whopping 0.016 CPD - is that right?
25-27 times less than CPD with target=11.
in other words - in a couple of weeks, it will not be interesting to mine this coin.  Smiley

when it moved from diff 9>10 it did the same thing. then leveled out for 4 years. this coin will sit sit at diff 11.7/11.8 for years
will not be. eXtremal will not.  Wink
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
Anybody tested hashrate of R9 290x/390x on XPM with 10.2.2 tweaked miner ? May be ~0.54 CPD ?
member
Activity: 114
Merit: 10
eXtremal. Your new miner will soon kill a coin  Cry Cry Cry
jr. member
Activity: 40
Merit: 1
Diffuculty 12 required 30 times more network power, than 11, not real now with current XPM price.
I understand.
But I'm talking about the attractiveness of a coin, and it looks like this, -25(30)%.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
at difficulty 12 good GPU's will be producing a whopping 0.016 CPD - is that right?
25-27 times less than CPD with target=11.
in other words - in a couple of weeks, it will not be interesting to mine this coin.  Smiley

when it moved from diff 9>10 it did the same thing. then leveled out for 4 years. this coin will sit sit at diff 11.7/11.8 for years
full member
Activity: 237
Merit: 100
at difficulty 12 good GPU's will be producing a whopping 0.016 CPD - is that right?
25-27 times less than CPD with target=11.
in other words - in a couple of weeks, it will not be interesting to mine this coin.  Smiley
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0

I have access to one 6x570 rig with same problem, but miner crashes rarely (1 times in 2-3 days).. I will try fix it in next miner version 10.3.
Now you can use simple .bat file:
Quote
:1
xpmclient
goto 1


How to use simple.bat file
Pages:
Jump to: