Pages:
Author

Topic: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! - page 2. (Read 50299 times)

member
Activity: 238
Merit: 15
Please support flag

Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3251
Flag type: 1
Scam accusation: selling Bitcointalk accounts, Scam
Account: AccountTrade
Reference Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/full-member25-senior-member50-hero-100-legend-200-5222975


copper member
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1302
Playbet.io - Crypto Casino and Sportsbook
User: Edwardard
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3240
Flat type: 3
Reason: Defaulted loan.
Please support or oppose which you think better.
copper member
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1814
฿itcoin for all, All for ฿itcoin.
I am lobbying for support of this type 2 flag created by a newbie so that It becomes active. The thread was later on moved to investigations board and right after the scam accusation was created so I had to try and help me

User: PayWithAnon
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3234
Flat type: 2
Reason: Refused to pay up for the services rendered to him
More details: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5470574
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
As a reminder:
Don't challenge the accused in this topic, do that in your Scam Accusation.

I've deleted the last 7 posts from this topic, and quoted them here.
member
Activity: 182
Merit: 33
Peace without Borders
I hereby opened a flag against Stunna in the name of Stake.com after I got my 20.000$ illegally stolen from me where I was able to play casino games in a excluded account. I have gotten zero replies from any Stake.com authorites so I decided to open a flag. Thanks if you both support me or oppose me.

Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3231
With respect,

Tetaeridanus.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
You have created flag type 2 which should be created by the victim. But you are not the victim in this case I could not understand why you have created such a type (type 2). It would be better if the victim (Maris Lunt) would create a flag that could be type 3.                                                                        
Isn't it obvious who created this flag with a simple click on the link that were provided?

legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 2594
Top Crypto Casino
User: PSTNET
Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/pstnet-3548015
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3203
Flag Type: 2
Reason: SCAM
Please support or oppose which you think is better.

You have created flag type 2 which should be created by the victim. But you are not the victim in this case I could not understand why you have created such a type (type 2). It would be better if the victim (Maris Lunt) would create a flag that could be type 3.                                                                         

You were mistaken. The victim, Maris Lunt, created that flag. dkbit98 just shared the link.

Maris Lunt alleges: PSTNET violated a casual or implied agreement, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here...
copper member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 4543
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
User: PSTNET
Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/pstnet-3548015
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3203
Flag Type: 2
Reason: SCAM
Please support or oppose which you think is better.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Moreover you're using flag type 1, it's only for the user who get scammed, did you get scammed by him? if not, create flag type 3.
You've got this completely wrong:
           type 1. Newbie warning: 'alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned'
            Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=29
            WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it: Due largely to the factors mentioned in'
            Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=37

            type 2. Violated implied agreement: 'violated a casual or implied agreement, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced'
            Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=30
            WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it:'
            Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=9

            type 3. Violated written contract with damages: 'violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced'
            Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=41
            WITHDRAWN: 'alleged the following, but later withdrew it:'
            Sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=35
Type 1 is the only Flag that can be created by anyone. Type 2 and 3 can only be created by victims.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 633
Please support flag

Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3204
Flag type: 1
Scam accusation: selling various accounts like ebay, very likely stolen identity
Account: ljubomir821
Reference Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/aged-kleinanzeigende-accounts-for-sale-5463403
I oppose your flag.

I know you're create this flag because of there are two negative feedbacks from trusted users leaved since 5 years ago and he's still active selling digital accounts. You're using the thread that created by him as a reference in your flag, that's incorrect since there's nothing I can read and judge if he's a scammer.

Moreover you're using flag type 1, it's only for the user who get scammed, did you get scammed by him? if not, create flag type 3.
member
Activity: 238
Merit: 15
Please support flag

Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3204
Flag type: 1
Scam accusation: selling various accounts like ebay, very likely stolen identity
Account: ljubomir821
Reference Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/aged-kleinanzeigende-accounts-for-sale-5463403
copper member
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1302
Playbet.io - Crypto Casino and Sportsbook
User: hold-coins (Alt of Devawnm367)
Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/hold-coins-2339451
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3202
Flag Type: 3
Reason: Loan Default ( By alt account)
Please support or oppose which you think is better.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
User: PSTNET
Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/pstnet-3548015
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3198
Flag Type: 1
Reason: SCAM
Please support or oppose which you think is better.

copper member
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1302
Playbet.io - Crypto Casino and Sportsbook
User: Devawnm367
Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/devawnm367-1713155
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3201
Flag Type: 3
Reason: Loan Default
Please support or oppose which you think is better.
copper member
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1302
Playbet.io - Crypto Casino and Sportsbook
User: Yabes
Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/yabes-2548375
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3187
Flag Type: 3
Reason: Loan Default
Please support or oppose which you think is better.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 2017
I guess it was going to be seen anyway, as I created the reference thread in this section, but just in case I ask for support for a type 1 flag on the creator of a fake lending service.

The thread:

Reference thread for flag on fake lending service.

The flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3182
newbie
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
User: Rollbit Razer
Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/rollbit-razer-3261248
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3178
Flag Type: 2
Reason: Bans user account with 10.2k funds in it without real explanation.
Scam accusation link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/rollbit-disables-account-and-seizes-funds-102k-5449402

Please support or oppose which you think better.
member
Activity: 196
Merit: 42
Don't talk the talk, if you can't walk the walk.
It seems that this member is still new here and maybe he didn't get to know all the things on the forum very well, so let me help him.

User CYBER_COWBOY opened scam accusations 63$ Loan defaulted by Rohan Kotkar

Scam accusation thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/rohan-kotkar-2690537
Proof of loan accepted: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62144289
Reason: Loan default
FLAG https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3175

Please support or oppose.

New flag with accurate link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3179
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
This is the wrong link. But the Flag itself links to the wrong topic, so it can't be Supported:
Creating or supporting a scammer flag is actively affirming a set of pretty clear fact-statements. If someone knowingly supports a flag containing incorrect fact-statements, then that is crystal-clear abuse, and I will seek to have such people removed from DT ASAP.

Update: I just saw you knew this already.
Pages:
Jump to: