Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! - page 7.

decodx

hero member

Activity: 1456

Merit: 940

🇺🇦 Glory to Ukraine!

Quote from: TalkStar on January 03, 2021, 04:27:23 PM

I am requesting support for this flag. Please take a look here,

Flag Type 1: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2566

Flaf supported. Obviously, this is a scammer looking for new naive victims.

Stay safe.

TalkStar

copper member

Activity: 1204

Merit: 737

✅ Need Campaign Manager? TG > @TalkStar675

I am requesting support for this flag. Please take a look here,

Flag Type 1: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2566

DireWolfM14

copper member

Activity: 2338

Merit: 4543

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Requesting support for a flag against user asu:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5294730
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2497

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: ?? on ??

Hello.

Please don't break bumping rules in my topic.

nullius

copper member

Activity: 630

Merit: 2614

If you don’t do PGP, you don’t do crypto!

DTs, please support:

Quote from: nullius on November 15, 2020, 02:42:37 PM

Flag #2465 on #2880133 “Slbtc” (trust page)

BettingSolutions

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Requesting support for red flag on user "corlies" https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/colires-2827158
All proofs and statements are in the report against him https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5288324
User was aditing contacting us for fake sale, after being caught and ignoring the request of escrow, he start to attack us with false non-proof based arguments, trying to cover his failed scam attempt by trying to connect us with people with past shady activity.
His ignorance, arrogance and aggressive attitude after escrow request is more than a red flag there is something shady with this member
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2459

notblox1

legendary

Activity: 2086

Merit: 1282

Logo Designer ⛨ BSFL Division1

Someone please support or oppose a Flag for member casino_sa_toshi and give him negative feedback.
He is most likely same scammer bittrafficme or better know as serial casino scammer.
Using exact same website and software.

More information:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5283572
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5283572

Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2405

Timelord2067

legendary

Activity: 3696

Merit: 2219

💲🏎️💨🚓

Quote from: Steamtyme on October 19, 2020, 01:58:36 PM

I have removed my support of the flag, and updated my post in this topic stating as much.

As I said in the other thread, support has now been withdrawn.

Steamtyme

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 2037

Quote from: LoyceV on October 19, 2020, 10:12:47 AM

Quote from: Timelord2067 on October 19, 2020, 08:12:48 AM

Hopefully "the powers that be" properly lock that account so we don't have a repeat of what went down a couple of months ago...

See:

Quote from: ?? on ??

I will request that theymos ban the "Lauda" account (u=101872)

Done. Lauda is banned in the same way as satoshi, such that it isn't possible to even log into the account anymore.

I have removed my support of the flag, and updated my post in this topic stating as much.

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: Timelord2067 on October 19, 2020, 08:12:48 AM

Hopefully "the powers that be" properly lock that account so we don't have a repeat of what went down a couple of months ago...

See:

Quote from: ?? on ??

I will request that theymos ban the "Lauda" account (u=101872)

Done. Lauda is banned in the same way as satoshi, such that it isn't possible to even log into the account anymore.

Timelord2067

legendary

Activity: 3696

Merit: 2219

💲🏎️💨🚓

Quote from: Steamtyme on October 19, 2020, 02:00:00 AM

I request support for this Flag on the Lauda account https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2398

In this topic they have expressed they are abandoning that account. This is a precaution against future potential scams.

The reasoning is sound and works for me. Not every account should have a warning attached, but the author them-self suggested hacking or impersonation might occur.

SUPPORTED.

Hopefully "the powers that be" properly lock that account so we don't have a repeat of what went down a couple of months ago...

nullius

copper member

Activity: 630

Merit: 2614

If you don’t do PGP, you don’t do crypto!

I request that DT oppose this flag. Thanks. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2398

Quote from: Steamtyme on October 19, 2020, 02:00:00 AM

I request support for this Flag on the Lauda account https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2398

In this topic they have expressed they are abandoning that account. This is a precaution against future potential scams.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5282911

As I stated in the relevant topic, to which further discussion should be directed:

Quote from: ?? on ??

I don’t think that it is right, productive, or at all appropriate to place a big warning banner on all of Lauda’s old threads, such as the famous wallet thread and stickied rules threads (!).

Whoever was behind the Lauda account was and is trustworthy—only, no longer connected to the account, as of today.

That is why I red-tagged the account with negative feedback, and a statement explicitly beginning, “Starting with the date of this feedback...” (And I was the first to tag the account.)

I considered raising a flag myself, then rejected the idea; and I have opposed your flag.

Steamtyme

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 2037

~~I request support for this Flag on the Lauda account https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2398~~

In this topic they have expressed they are abandoning that account. This is a precaution against future potential scams.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5282911

Edit: My response to Nullius in the other thread, only updating as it seems relevant to the post below. I will not be discussing this flag further in this thread.

Quote from: ?? on ??

That's fine and you are free to do so. The flag criteria is easily met for me moving forward from this day. Dealing with the account is a risk. reading what the account wrote is not. My own neutral feedback also states the value of some of their previous posts. i am not in anyway discussing the individual behind the Lauda account only the account itself.

Quote

This account has been abandoned. Do not deal with this account under any circumstances as it will not be the original owner. Beyond that please still learn from the informative posts they created here on the forum.

Edit: Forum admins have taken steps to lock the account permanently, in the same manner as the Satoshi account. I no longer see a warning flag as necessary with the Lauda account. I have removed my support for the flag.

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: ?? on ??

Please support the flag for new Coinsbit sock puppet

As I wrote on your feedback: you're a Trust abuser. I'll let you have this post in my thread though, but I don't want to read your very long topic. Examplens is right: BTCU_official is only mentioned after hitting PageDown 60 times.

I've done some self-moderating on this subject, see https://loyce.club/archive/details/topic_5153445.html if you really want to read it.

examplens

legendary

Activity: 3472

Merit: 3507

Crypto Swap Exchange

Quote from: ?? on ??

Please support the flag for new Coinsbit sock puppet, which started a self moderated thread today! Thx!

When I see a topic like on the flag, I lost the will to read it all. There the damn book writer and posted all conversations. Tons of screenshots with "hi" messages on Telegram, etc... Need to spend too much time for one sock puppet account.
You should be a little more concise in exposition.
I am supported flag against user BTCU_ULTIMATE, whether they are the same accounts or it connects them in the same scam?

JollyGood

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1713

Top Crypto Casino

I have supported the flag because the same scammers are now using a self-moderated thread to try to steal from people and forum members need to be aware of it.

Quote from: ?? on ??

Please support the flag for new Coinsbit sock puppet, which started a self moderated thread today! Thx!

SiNeReiNZzz

legendary

Activity: 1022

Merit: 1043

αLPʜα αɴd ΩMeGa

Quote from: SamuelJobs on September 23, 2020, 01:04:19 PM

Requesting support for this one: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2695959
Story:
Contacted this guy about his self-moderated and locked topic about selling XRP here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xrp-for-paypal-5277725
I send him this private message:
https://prnt.sc/umm6bb

After few minutes he contacted me thru telegram:
https://prnt.sc/umm6mh
https://prnt.sc/umm6ta
https://prnt.sc/umm79v
https://prnt.sc/umm7je
https://prnt.sc/umm7sp
https://prnt.sc/umm83w
https://prnt.sc/umm8dx

After that i received negative feedback from this 3rd world failed scammer Cheesy

I hope he will be tagged and also flag supported.

Flag not supported! I think you have to look at yourself...
For the future it would be good to add a direct link to the flag, to make it easier for us...

Best Regards

SiNeReiNZzz

SamuelJobs

jr. member

Activity: 55

Merit: 1

Requesting support for this one: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2695959
Story:
Contacted this guy about his self-moderated and locked topic about selling XRP here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xrp-for-paypal-5277725
I send him this private message:
https://prnt.sc/umm6bb

After few minutes he contacted me thru telegram:
https://prnt.sc/umm6mh
https://prnt.sc/umm6ta
https://prnt.sc/umm79v
https://prnt.sc/umm7je
https://prnt.sc/umm7sp
https://prnt.sc/umm83w
https://prnt.sc/umm8dx

After that i received negative feedback from this 3rd world failed scammer Cheesy

I hope he will be tagged and also flag supported.

SiNeReiNZzz

legendary

Activity: 1022

Merit: 1043

αLPʜα αɴd ΩMeGa

Quote from: nullius on September 20, 2020, 05:10:24 AM

DT members, please support Type 1 Flag #2342 (scam accusation) against a probable fake newbie account that was created in 2017, suddenly woke up with a password change, made a false scam accusation against Prime Dice, and then turned around and promised to advertise a “no risky” dice profit strategy (ironically with statement of using “alotof alts accounts on primedice”).

Thank you.

I have also supported the flag!
Additionally I have left negative feedback in his profile.

It is really starting to annoy...

Best Regards

JollyGood

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1713

Top Crypto Casino

Flag supported.

No matter how small or trivial a scam might seem but a scam is a scam at the end of the day.

Quote from: nullius on September 20, 2020, 05:10:24 AM

DT members, please support Type 1 Flag #2342 (scam accusation) against a probable fake newbie account that was created in 2017, suddenly woke up with a password change, made a false scam accusation against Prime Dice, and then turned around and promised to advertise a “no risky” dice profit strategy (ironically with statement of using “alotof alts accounts on primedice”).

Thank you.

Topic: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! - page 7. (Read 50394 times)